Preview

Assess The Contribution Of Structural Functionalism To Our Understanding Of Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Contribution Of Structural Functionalism To Our Understanding Of Society
Structural functionalists, or functionalists view society as a whole, where each part such as the family, our education, the government, religion, and the economy work together in order to keep all of society as a whole living a sustainable lifestyle. According to Functionalism, society is a system of linked parts that work together to maintain a state of physical balance for all of society as a whole. Functionalists believe that society works together to promote unity and strength and focuses on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. Conflict theorists, however, are concentrated on explaining and discussing social interaction as a continuous struggle for power and control …show more content…
Conflict theorists view that the underlying causes of crime and deviance are the social, political, and economic power that manage within our society. In conflict theory, deviant behaviours were action that do not conform to the social principles and that there must be some sort of social justice. Karl Marx, who generated the conflict theory, had written and discussed about alienation, one which was amongst workers and the products that they produced, in which that can cause deviant behaviour. Another approach generated by Marx is class consciousness which deals with the awareness of ones place in a system of social classes and the difference in social classes which can create class conflict. A functionalists approach to crime takes all of society into consideration. Émile Durkheim, who is considered to be the founder of modern sociology, argues that crime is inevitable and part of every social life. Crime is present in all types of society because not every member of society had the same shared values and beliefs. Functionalists view that society must have some sort of crime or deviance, for society to be functional. It only becomes dysfunctional when the crime rate his unusually high or low. The public response to crime and social deviance is what makes society functional as it reinforces social unity and unites society

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of Functionalist's ideas on crime derive from the work of Durkheim. Durkheim believes that crime in inevitable because not every member of society shares the same values and norms; every society has crime, particularly the most advanced industrial societies. Crime is seen as not only inevitable, but functional to society because it allows for change, which is vital for society to function. Durkheim argues that crime brings society together, as in the case of the Soham murders. From this point of view it can be questioned what the function of punishment is, Durkheim believes punishment is a form of social control and act as a signal to people. A.K Cohen developed Durkheim's ideas further, providing further possible functions of deviance. Firstly deviance can act as a safety valve providing an expression of discontent. Cohen uses the example of prostitution, he believes this protects the institution of the family and provides a release from the stress of family life without undermining family stability because the relationship between prostitute and client has no emotional attachments. In other words it is fine for a man to use a prostitute, but not to have an affair because that would jeopardise the family! Cohen believes that deviance acts as a warning device too indicate that an aspect of society is malfunctioning, thus drawing attention to it and allowing the problem to be resolved. An example of…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the other hand, Functionalists may argue that crime is not caused by material deprivation but by poor socialisation. The new right is particularly damning in its evaluation of this particular Marxists idea, saying crime stems from the welfare state and permissiveness.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists see the source of crime as located within the structure of society and they believe society produces an individual and many of these functionalists also believe that crime serves a positive function in society. Functionalist supporters like Durkheim claim some crimes are inevitable in society and are impossible to vanish completely, and he believes these crimes can become a positive in society because when punishments are handed out to criminals this portrays a stern message that crime is wrong and won’t be tolerated and therefore discourages others in society to commit crimes and ultimately raises awareness of crimes.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One key opinion of the functionalist perspective is that crime is a good thing. Factionalists view crime as beneficial for society because we can learn from it, they would argue that if, for example, a woman was walking alone in a short dress down a dark alleyway way in town and was sexually assaulted, then the rest of society could learn from this and avoid being alone, wearing revealing clothing and walking down dark alleyways. However, the victim does obviously not see this as positive! Because of the view that crime is needed, Emile Durkheim stated that crime was inevitable as it provided two main functions; ‘Boundary Maintenance’ and ‘Adaption to Change.’ ‘Boundary Maintenance’ is view that crime produces a reaction from society uniting its members in disapproval of criminals. This explains the function of punishment, which is to reaffirm society’s shared rules. ‘Adaption to Change’ is the view that all changes start with acts of…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7

    • 3346 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Functionalists believe that society is held together by social consensus, in which members of the society agree upon, and work together to achieve, what is best for society as a whole.…

    • 3346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Functionalism is a theoretical orientation which views society as a system of interdependent parts whose functions contribute to keep society alive and stable. Crime has been a part of society since the beginning and yet we have not done anything drastic to reduce or even remove it because it is needed for society to function normally. Crime has become the somewhat normal in society because of it creates employment opportunities for everyone. Law enforcement, lawyers and judges, security guards all have jobs built around the negativity of crime. People commit crimes for personal reasons such as to support family, themselves, and/or drug addictions. There are endless reasons to why people commit crimes. When a crime has been committed, it disrupts social by changing the normal function of society.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three theoretical perspectives are functionalism, conflict theory, and the insurrectionist perspective, which help serve as a means of helping frame research. Functionalism, also known as structural functionalism, sees society as a complex network working together in balance. Those who study functionalism examin society by contemplating what each separate part of the network does to help society work in harmony. Functionalist view society as a well-functioning self-sufficient machine. The functionalism theory is very broad in that it tries to explain all the parts of human society . Functionalism serves a very important part in sociology because most sections of society have a purpose in the network. The explanation for social change is challenging for functionalist because of “The assumption…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three major sociological perspectives, functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism, are perception lenses which Sociologists utilize to answer the two basic questions in building theory; what issues should we study? And how should the facts be linked? Essentially, each perspective conceptualizes and analyzes how society influences people as well as how people can influence society. Functionalism or structural-functionalism is sociological perspective that analyzes society on a macro level.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominance. Societies are maintained and controlled through order and dictations by authority. Social conflict paradigm distinguishes society by social inequality and social conflict. Social conflict also focuses on macro-sociology. Symbolic interaction paradigm says society functions well through interactions. Communication is spread…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why is it Wrong to say that “What is Good for Society, is Good for the Individual” Structural Functionalism focuses on the idea of how Institutions within society are structured, and work together in order to eventually form a functional society. It doesn’t study the individuals of society, but provides analysis on the overall social system, its functionality, and how it affects human behaviour. This theory can also be understood by looking at the metaphor of organs within a system. Organs, much like Institutions, work together to form a functional system, where Institutions form a society.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major distinction between functionalist and all other theories of crime causation is the former's apparent positive view of deviant behaviour. Ordinary crime is not a threat to the social order. In fact, society needs criminal behaviour (and legal responses to it) to function properly.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Perspective

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, functionalists believe that society is viewed as a “system of interconnected parts” that works collectively in order to sustain a sense of social balance within the world. For example, each of the social institutions is responsible for providing essential functions to society: Family is seen as accountable for “reproducing, nurturing and socialising children”, whereas education provides…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism has given a useful understanding of society, despite its limitations. Functionalists describe society using an organic analogy; they say society is like a biological organism. Parsons found three similarities between society and an organism. System organisms such as the human body and society are both self-regulating and inter-related, independent parts fit together in fixed ways. In the body these are organs; in society they are institutions, such as family and education. Both organisms have system needs for example an organism needs nutrition without which it would die. Social systems have basic needs for example members of society need to be socialised. Both society and organisms function to contribute to meeting the systems needs and thus ensure survival. For example the circulatory systems delivers oxygen to cells, similarly the economy in society helps meet the needs for food and shelter.…

    • 3360 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structural Functional Theory is one of the frameworks sociologists employs to understand the world. The idea focused on this theory is that society is an intricate unit composed of interconnected parts (Macionis, 2008). Durkheim, a French sociologist based his work on this theory. He argues that deviance is normal and vital part of any society since it adds to the social order. According to Durkheim, deviance fulfills four functions.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays