Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Sociologists View on Crime

Good Essays
402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sociologists View on Crime
Functionalists view on crime

Crime is behaviour that breaks the law. Functionalist explanations, like other sociological models such as labelling or conflict theory, look at the implications of crime and crime control policies, rather than directly attempting to explain the causes of criminal behaviour. However, unlike other biological, psychological, and sociological models that remove blame from offenders by claiming criminals have little free will, a functionalist approach favours repression of criminal activity and the use of appropriate sanctions.
The major distinction between functionalist and all other theories of crime causation is the former's apparent positive view of deviant behaviour. Ordinary crime is not a threat to the social order. In fact, society needs criminal behaviour (and legal responses to it) to function properly.
Of course, the crime rate should remain within an acceptable limit, as too high a rate of crime might indicate an emerging problem, such as the rise of anomic conditions or lack of social norms. Overall, crime is treated as a key indicator of systemic well-being. Yet, a low crime rate is not considered necessarily indicative of social stability. Society's response to crime in the form of negative feedback helps the citizenry recognize the boundaries of acceptable behaviour. This is just one aspect of a cybernetic social system attempting to remain in homeostasis while continuing to gradually make progress. Crime is part of any social system; defined as a pattern of social acts in pursuit of individual and collective goals and governed by its need to maintain its own structure.

Marxist view on crime

Crime is behaviour that breaks the law. While Marx did not write at length about crime, Marx argued that the laws were generally the codified means by which one class, the rulers, kept another class, the rest of us in check. Marxists recognise that for a society to function efficiently, social order is necessary. However, apart from communist societies, they consider that in all societies’ one class – the ruling class – gains far more than other classes. Marxists agree with functionalists that socialisation plays a crucial role in promoting conformity and order. However, unlike the latter, they are highly critical of the ideas, values and norms of capitalist society, which they term ‘capitalist ideology’. Modern Marxists point to education and the media as socialising agencies, which delude or ‘mystify’ the working class into conforming to a social order, which works against its real interests.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Functionalist approach towards crime & deviance is seen as a top down approach as it looks at society as a whole, stating that criminal behaviour is caused by society itself except from being caused through an individual’s biology & psychology. Durkheim sees deviance as inevitable also being necessary for our society, however other perspectives such as Marxist & Feminist may state otherwise.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism however argues the consensus view that law and norms about acceptable behaviour in any society are simply a reflection of the wider collective conscience and these laws and social rules are created and enforced to the benefit of everyone. Therefore deviance is behaviour that breaks these agreements on what is acceptable. Functionalists view this defining process as straightforward and objective.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxist sociologists argue that in order to understand crime and deviance, one needs to realise that it is the nature of exploitative economic systems that capitalist societies have in place that is primarily responsible. This is because the bourgeoisie and ruling classes oppress and exploit the working classes, which drives them into poverty. This causes a rift between the “haves” and the “have-nots” as the workers try to end exploitation whilst the owners of the means of production aim to keep the system to maintain profits. Most Marxists agree that crime is the result of poverty created through this system, for example people steal because they are materially deprived which is a result of low wages being paid by the ruling classes. This is a reason Marxists would give for the over-representation of the working classes in official crime statistics.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marxist theory in general splits society in half, the rich and the poor. With the poor being exploited by the rich. This theory appears to be the basis for all Marxist perspective including the Marxist explanations of crime and deviance. Karl Marx stated that crime was the product of poverty and the traditional Marxist view regarding the cause of crime amongst the working classes is competition and the desire to acquire wealth. The working class people want the ‘things’ that they see the middle classes with but they cant afford them so they resort to stealing. The explanation of the cause of the majority of crime is given as the people fighting back against the oppression of a corrupt capitalist society.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance (21 marks)…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is bad behavior displayed by citizens who reject societal norms and instead chose to commit crime. However, there are many types of theories of why crime occurs the most prevalent cause for crime involves the social environment of the criminal offender. Psychological theories discusses that these interruptions in childhood development is the cause for crime but because the delays developmental is the effect of the criminal’s environment. The same goes for biological theories that find genetic or biological factors that make a person more prone to become a criminal but require certain environmental factors for the person in reality to become a criminal.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists see the source of crime as located within the structure of society and they believe society produces an individual and many of these functionalists also believe that crime serves a positive function in society. Functionalist supporters like Durkheim claim some crimes are inevitable in society and are impossible to vanish completely, and he believes these crimes can become a positive in society because when punishments are handed out to criminals this portrays a stern message that crime is wrong and won’t be tolerated and therefore discourages others in society to commit crimes and ultimately raises awareness of crimes.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One key opinion of the functionalist perspective is that crime is a good thing. Factionalists view crime as beneficial for society because we can learn from it, they would argue that if, for example, a woman was walking alone in a short dress down a dark alleyway way in town and was sexually assaulted, then the rest of society could learn from this and avoid being alone, wearing revealing clothing and walking down dark alleyways. However, the victim does obviously not see this as positive! Because of the view that crime is needed, Emile Durkheim stated that crime was inevitable as it provided two main functions; ‘Boundary Maintenance’ and ‘Adaption to Change.’ ‘Boundary Maintenance’ is view that crime produces a reaction from society uniting its members in disapproval of criminals. This explains the function of punishment, which is to reaffirm society’s shared rules. ‘Adaption to Change’ is the view that all changes start with acts of…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime theories can vary greatly. A lot of people think that poverty or social status is a major factor on criminal behavior. Others believe that is embedded in human beings to be born with evil therefore we are attracted to crime. Bottom line is deterrence cannot be achieved unless the underlining cause for criminal behavior is found.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Timmer's Definition of Law

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A definition of crime represents the legal conditions under which the state, as an instrument of an economically dominant class, exercises its power to punish.” I feel that the state maintains the capitalist order through laws. Primarily, control is done through the governing of consciousness of the population. The ruling class gives rise to their own ideology to protect themselves. Capitalism’s most subtle means of control is to try and manipulate the minds of the people. They try to dictate the future through the people’s thinking and overall living. This type of dictatorship is cultural, psychological, economic and political. When an existing order becomes threatened, the focus on crime rises. The ruling class diverts attention and gains validation for utilization of criminal sanctions to regain stability. The public, must feel that their interests are being protected, not only the ruling class alone. In doing this the state works to serve the interests of the capitalist ruling class.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marsh, I., Melville G., Norris G., Morgan K., Walkington, Z. (2006). Theories of Crime. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. P125.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics