I don’t think law enforcement officers should face any consequences to review a pharmacy records because they are acting off of good faith. When law enforcement are looking into patients records they are aiming to generalize public safety. Although, when law enforcement officers review patient’s records, they may notice something that looks suspicious. For example, a 16 year old boy would be receiving a 150 oxycodone’s per month. Or if a 50 year old women is receiving 50 Viagra pills per month. Why is a women receiving Viagra? Those pills are for males. That is an automatic red flag and law enforcement should look deeper into that patient’s record to see how long that’s been going on. This could now turn into a criminal investigation. For the 16 year old boy they might investigate why is he receiving so many pills and he is a kid. Then for the 50 year old women, what is she doing with the Viagra pills. As a law enforcement I would assume that she is selling
I don’t think law enforcement officers should face any consequences to review a pharmacy records because they are acting off of good faith. When law enforcement are looking into patients records they are aiming to generalize public safety. Although, when law enforcement officers review patient’s records, they may notice something that looks suspicious. For example, a 16 year old boy would be receiving a 150 oxycodone’s per month. Or if a 50 year old women is receiving 50 Viagra pills per month. Why is a women receiving Viagra? Those pills are for males. That is an automatic red flag and law enforcement should look deeper into that patient’s record to see how long that’s been going on. This could now turn into a criminal investigation. For the 16 year old boy they might investigate why is he receiving so many pills and he is a kid. Then for the 50 year old women, what is she doing with the Viagra pills. As a law enforcement I would assume that she is selling