Mr. Adams
English
September 23, 2013
Assisted Suicide
In the 1990s, ‘Doctor Death’ Jack Kevorkian invented the first assisted suicide machine
in the world. He was then thrown into prison for 7 years (Pickert). This caught people’s attention
and made them question whether it should be legal to request physician assisted suicide, which is
when someone asks a physician to help him or her terminate his or her life. This topic became
one of the most popular discussions in recent years, but the truth is that it has actually been a
centuries- old debate. For both logical and humanitarian reasons, assisted suicide is not right and
should not be legalize.
Is it right for a nation founded on Christianity to allow citizens to choose assisted
suicide? Can a decision that is made by a mentally ill person be treated as a rational decision? Is
the prevention of pain an acceptable circumstance in which to end a life? People still do not have
a widely accepted answer. It is not clear whether physician assisted suicide is right or wrong.
Assisted suicide should not be viewed solely as affecting one life, but should be viewed as a
decision that affects many.
The declaration of independence states that everyone has the right to pursue happiness
In whatever way they choose. Many argue that a decision to kill oneself is a private choice, that
society should not be, and has no right to be concerned. America believes that with its freedom,
people can do almost everything based on their own choices. Physician assisted suicide is also
one of the choices that they can decide. The common argument is that these people are adults
who can make rational and reasonable choices, however many people who request physician
assisted suicide are mentally ill. Of those who attempt suicide but were unsuccessful, less than 4
percent go on to kill themselves in the future, which means that most people changed their mind
after a period of recovery. Psychological evidence shows that those who ask for physician
assisted suicide in order to avoid pain are normally ambivalent, and they usually attempt to end
their life for other reasons than a settled desire to die. Since assisted suicide has already become
a popular way to end suffering and pain, people who were in the status might feel it is necessary
for them to kill themselves since they have in their mind become a burden to their family and
society. Some would say it is wrong for such an impression to have the power to persuade a
personto end their life due to their weakness and disability.
As a Christian nation, America wants a positive and happy image for the country.
American people value the meaning of life, and According to what most of the Christians
believe, God is the one who created life. Then how can people have the right to end something
that they did not even create in the first place? American society does not think assisted suicide
is good as a whole, because assisted suicide is still a self-caused death, which is equal to suicide.
Although there is always a vague line drawn between assisted suicide and attempted
murder. Assisted suicide is the opposite of happiness because it demonstrates utter depression. It
is clear that American society sees assisted suicide as wrong, because there is a suicide watch
team among the police and counselors at schools who are trained to help and avert suicide.
Asking for assisted suicide as a form of pain relief and signing a release form is not acceptable
either. People cannot solve problems by trying to get rid of them. People who stand against
physician-assisted suicide believe that suffering is just a stage of life. And lots of people who
were prevented from assisted suicide will tell you that they all passed that stage successfully,
and they are appreciative that they were stopped from asking for physician-assisted suicide.
Assisted suicide also hurts the people who care about those who were asking for a
physician assisted suicide. Patients might get relived from their long suffering and pain but their
family will be hurt from one’s immature decision. The person only thought of their own
feelings and never considered others who are around them and how they feel. Families and loved
ones will be upset about their decision to take their lives in a selfish act. Other evidence that
shows assisted suicide is wrong is the fact that there are always suicide prevention billboards in
communities. This should show the government that people do not want those around them to
commit suicide.
People who fight for the right to have physician-assisted suicide argue that assisted
suicide can bring benefits to both patients and society. They believe that people who
choose assisted suicide will die with dignity rather than suffer the pain of illness( O'Steen,
Burke). That they will not let their family and friends suffer anymore by showing their weakness
and sickness. By choosing assisted suicide, patients can also reduce a huge amount of medical
expenses that insurance does not cover. To benefit society, their organs can be donated to save
people’s lives (Humphrey). Doctors and nurses can spend more time on recovering patients
rather than waste time on patients who are assured death, and of course, they still think it is a part
of one’s freedom to be able to choose for himself whether to live or die. Whether it is one’s
rational decision to chose to end their life has always been the center of this debate. Because
without arguing about one’s free right, those who favor assisted suicide will lose an important
statement.
Although there is a ton of evidence showing that physician assisted suicide is not right,
it is a fact that so many people are still in favor to legalize assisted suicide. They believe that
rather than give people hope to live, telling them the truth and offering them an option is more
reasonable. They argued that in some ways, it is humane to give dying people assisted suicide;
society is okay with people helping a sick or dying animal yet people are not okay with letting a
sick and dying patient go. It was said that humans are too selfish to let their loved ones go, even
if death would be a comfort. People who think it is illegal for a physician to offer assisted suicide
are accused of wanting to control other people’s lives. People think that one has his/her own will
about their life that no one is suppose to tell them what they should do and should not do.
Especially when their faith to live is completely gone. It was understood as a merciful behavior
for a physician to offer help to end one’s life. A new statement was also brought up to argue in
the favor of legalize assisted suicide. It is that if one can reject medical treatment to prolong life
then why can't one request treatment to end it? Many people found this statement be reasonable
and useful to support the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
After centuries’ debating, there is still no certain answer for those questions that are
brought up by the topic of assisted suicide. Two sides are still debating about the benefits and
negative effects of assisted suicide. Still to this day no one is able to convince the either group to
change their views on this topic. In 2006, the US Supreme Court ruled that legalizing assisted
suicide is to be the responsibility of each state respectively. No one can yet predict how long this
topic will still be an argumentative topic for debate, And no one can predict how this issue will
effect human life in the future. But overall, do people really possess the right to kill a life that
was not created by them? It is still a big question that no one has yet given an answer that can
satisfy everyone. Maybe one-day people will find out the right answer and that assisted suicide
will be a new thing that brings benefits to the world. Physician suicide should be banned due to
its negative cause and impaction to society. People who think assisted suicide should be
illegalized because of the value of life to a society is still the majority; ending a life is
not so simple that people should decide to do so on their own.
Work cited
Pickert, Kate. "A brief history of assisted suicide." a brief history of assisted suicide. N.p., 3 Mar. 2009. Web. 13 Sept. 2013. .
Humphry, Derek. "Liberty and Death: A manifesto concerning an individual's right to choose to die." Assisted Suicide - Information on right-to-die and euthanasia laws and history. N.p., 24 Mar. 2009. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.
"Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript." National Archives and Records Administration. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.
O'Steen, David N. , and Burke J. Balch. "Why We Should Not Legalize Assisted Suicide | New York State Right to Life." Welcome | New York State Right to Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.
Information on right-to-die and euthanasia laws and history. N.p., 24 Mar. 2009. Web. 18 Sept.2013. .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
There are times when life takes an unforeseen route, and one is faced with an obstacle or situation that was not expected. Many people are diagnosed with terminal diseases, have accidents and are left with severe impairments, and suffer horrendous complications from medical issues. One has the right, according to law, to make medical decisions about their care and treatment options. But should one have the right to end their life? Assisted, or voluntary euthanasia, is the direct administration of a lethal agent to end one’s life at the request of…
- 1466 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Susan Wolf, in writing about her own father's death, is facing a difficult and emotional issue that challenges her to consider her views on assisted suicide (Wolf, 2008). Assisted suicide is the common term for actions by which an individual helps another person voluntarily brings about his or her own death. "Assistance" may mean providing one with the means to end one's own life. In the article, “Confronting Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia”, by Susan Wolf, Susan shares the difficult and painful death of her father.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Every person knows what the circle of life consists of- to be born, to grow and to die. The lines between the right and wrongs of each are fuzzy and unclear. Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates and there are so many questions with no clear answers: who should and shouldn’t be allowed to assist in suicides? Should assisted suicide be just for the terminally ill, or for all? What protection will there be for the people? and the biggest question of all- is it right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is their own right. That there is a significant “difference between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die” (Breslow). Others however, believe The Suicide…
- 161 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
There exists in some places already a choice to have assistance in the process of ending one’s life; to have a good death on one’s own terms.…
- 2570 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Physician-assisted suicide is the intentional end of one's own life by the organization of a deadly substance with the immediate or backhanded help of a doctor. Some people support Physician Assisted suicide while others do not. In order, to develop a better understanding of this trending issue, we must first look at different perspectives and viewpoints while approaching the topic. These viewpoints are moral, practical, and legal.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
My support on this claim it is assisted suicide a right way or wrong way By Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez “Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that all persons have a moral right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they inflict no harm on others. This right of free choice includes the right to end one 's life when we choose. For most…
- 531 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…
- 1640 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
religious beliefs however, it is not. Some may state that physician assisted suicide is morally…
- 1567 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In physician-assisted suicide, a physician gives a terminally ill patient a prescription for a lethal dose of narcotics to be self administered when the times comes that the effects of his disease are no longer controllable or tolerable. As of now, it is legal only in the state of Oregon. It has long been disputed for many reasons. Among them are religion, public opinion, and how to govern and restrict the process. As there is supposed to be a division of Church and State, religion should play no part in making this decision. According to a poll, “61% of people answered ‘yes’ to the question ‘Shall…
- 1581 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Forty-nine states have passed laws regulating assisted suicide, and forty-eight of them prohibit the study of it. Oregon is the only state where physicians are able to help their terminally ill patients, or anyone for that matter commit suicide. The debate of whether human beings, or even doctors have the right to help others die has been around since before the birth of Christ. There was an oath that was written the fourth century B.C, that states that physicians will not give a lethal drug to anyone, if asked and wont advise, and promise no abortions. Physician assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of ones own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Physician assisted suicide would cause suicides to climax. There is always another way out, no one should ever result to suicide, and no one should encourage it.…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Gunderson, Martin. “A Right to Suicide Does Not Entail a Right to Assisted Death.” Journal of…
- 2368 Words
- 10 Pages
Best Essays -
activist who tried to legalize assisted suicide under the argument that everyone deserves a humane death. There had been much debate on the issue,…
- 1047 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Our constitution allows someone to have freedom of choice. This concept should be applied to assisted suicide. One should have control over his life and. If one loses quality of life to a point that death becomes a solution, it should be their…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays