Preview

Atomic War or Peace

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Atomic War or Peace
Atomic War or Peace?

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan justified? Many people believe that it was very justified, but was it? Some reasons could have been the attack on Pearl Harbor, the destruction of Japans power to make war, also what seemed to the only answer to end war. “I wouldn’t hesitate if I had the choice. I’d wipe ‘em out. You’re gonna kill millions of innocent people, but at the same time we’ve never fought a war anywhere in the world where they haven’t fought and killed innocent people.”
-Paul Tibbets (DOC 6.) In that statement, Paul was stating that withier we dropped the bomb or not we’d still be killing innocent people. It was also more of an easy victory for the US by dropping the bomb more lives would be saved rather than letting the war go on. It seemed like the only way for the US.
“We will issue a warning statement asking the Japanese to surrender and save lives” -‘’Truman Diary Transcript’’ (DOC.6)
The Japanese were warned to surrender or face prompt or utter destruction. The US had their planes fly over and drop “leaflets”, or papers that warned Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and 33 other Japanese cities to leave the surrounding areas , if they didn’t leave not only were they putting themselves in danger but they put their families in danger . The US gave the people two days to evacuate before they would drop the bombs.
“We shall completely destroy Japans power to make war” -“President of the US” (DOC. 7) An eye for an eye, what made this seem like the only choice? It was either drop the bombs, kill a few thousand people or not drop the bomb, the war lingers on and more people die than the bombs killed. WW2 had to stop and this made it happen. Neither country could afford any more warring on the other, this was a costly expense. True the US killed innocent people, but if they didn't

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, Ending The War Against Japan: Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb, the author provides information on the war in the Pacific which involved the United States and Japan. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the United States entered the second World War in 1941. United States gained control of Okinawa in 1945 which meant that the U.S had control, in the months of May through August there were major air attacks on Japan, the Manhattan Project and the two atomic bombs the United States dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the choice out of the many options that might have been given to President Truman and Secretary of War, Henry Stimson. They felt that dropping the atomic bomb was the best way to get the Japanese to give an unconditional surrender.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan during World War Two because they didn't want to lose any more American lives. These American lives are major values to their loved ones.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the bombing by the United States was justified because the bomb saved lives and the Japanese cheap shot the U.S. at Pearl Harbor. For starters, the bomb saved lives. The bomb dropped by the Americans on the Japanese, saved many more American and Japanese lives. The Japanese said that they would never quit, as it was the dishonorable thing to do. If the Americans were to have tried to capture Japan, the Japanese citizens were prepared to commit seppoku. If the Americans were to have tried by force, many Americans would be wounded in the attempt. Next, the Americans were not in the wrong for bombing the Japanese because the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor when the Americans were not in the war. This justified the Americans act because…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After considering the pros and cons of the use of nuclear weapons I believe that President Truman and the U.S were not justified in the use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender. First of all there were alternative options to resolve the war than resorting to drop a bomb. Instead of bombing Japan we could’ve cut a deal or create a treaty to end the war with little to no bloodshed or could’ve even waited for the Russians to attack to scare Japan into conditional surrender or at least less casualties if assisted by U.S army. Truman should have assessed…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr's War Message

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his address to Congress, Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) speaks urgently and fluently about our need to act, or more specifically, our need to declare war on Japan. Roosevelt begins by complementing his audience and speaking very straight forward about what had happened. Utilizing some effective connotations, Roosevelt states, “the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.” Notice, “suddenly”, “deliberately” and “Empire didn’t necessarily need to be in that statement. These uses of connotation can also be seen as a means of expressing pathos, as to set the audience up and appeal to their emotions.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Japan has, therefore, undertaken a surprise offensive extending throughout the Pacific area. The facts of yesterday and today speak for themselves. The people of the United States have already formed their opinions and well understand the implications to the very life and safety of our nation.”…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays