Preview

Australian Republic Debate - Negative

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Australian Republic Debate - Negative
Australia should cut all ties with the British Monarchy and become a Republic – Negative

Australia should not detach itself from the British Monarchy and become a republic. In doing so, Australia will abolish its constitutional monarchy system of government that has worked exceptionally well for it and its people. Australia does not need to prove its independence by becoming a republic. On top of this, a republic is a useless change for Australia, and in becoming one, many concerns and issues will arise. Cutting all ties with the British Monarchy and becoming a republic is a disadvantageous move for Australia.

A republic will eliminate a constitutional monarchy that has worked incredibly well for Australia. A constitutional monarchy system of government has brought great stability, cohesion and positive outcomes to Australia and its entire population for over 100 years. In this time, Australia has grown from an undeveloped land mass to one of the world’s fastest-growing, strongest and wealthiest countries in the world. Australia has a higher GDP per capita than the United States today because of its constitutional monarchy (eNotes, 2011). Also, since 1945, hundreds of thousands of immigrants have left unstable republics for Australia and loved the social and political stability they found in it under a constitutional monarchy. A republic would only restrain Australia from reaching its full potential and ruin previous and current substantial growth as a country. Australia’s constitutional monarchy system of government is the only way for Australia if it is to continue in its success.

Australia does not need to become a republic to demonstrate its independence as a nation. Australia behaves like a republic and has the characteristics of one, and therefore does not need to officially become a republic to prove its independence. These republican-like actions include having our own flag, singing our own national anthem and playing international sport under our



Bibliography: AustralianPolitics.com, 2011, John Howard’s Response To Paul Keating’s Republic Announcement, Viewed 10th August 2011, http://australianpolitics.com/issues/republic/95-06-08_howard-republic-speech.shtml AustralianPolitics.com, 2011, John Howard’s Statement in Support of the “NO” Case, Viewed 10th August 2011, http://australianpolitics.com/1999/10/25/john-howard-statement-against-a-republic.html Constitutional Convention, 13 February 1998, Transcript of Proceedings. Accessed 9th August 2011, Obtained from http://australianpolitics.com/issues/republic/convention/130298.pdf eNotes, 2011, List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita, Viewed 5th September 2011, http://www.enotes.com/topic/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita Jules, 2008, Australian republic debate, Viewed 8th August 2011, http://www.actnow.com.au/Issues/Australian_republic_debate.aspx Linton, M., 2002, The Terror in the French Revolution, Viewed 12th August 2011, http://www.port.ac.uk/special/france1815to2003/chapter1/interviews/filetodownload,20545,en.pdf Souter, S., 2004, The Australian Republic Issue, Viewed 10th August 2011, http://www-personal.edfac.usyd.edu.au/staff/souters/republic1.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Brennan keenly incorporates former Australian Prime Minister and former leader of the Labor Party, Julia Gillard’s speech on the anniversary of Kevin Rudd’s National apology statement. Brennan acknowledged that her dialogue was indeed the truth and seemed sentimental enough that it would in way resonate with his intended audience. Gillard posed a series of truthful questions that Brennan believed exemplified the essence of his discussion: “How do we share this land on what terms? How adequate are our … laws … to express our history …? No gesture speaks more deeply to the healing of our nation’s fabric than amending our nation’s founding character” (Brennan, cited in Gillard 2013). By providing evidence through respected sources, Brennan is able to explore the context of what is he is trying to relay (having a renewed referendum) in a more respected yet persuading manner. Brennan also makes judgement on parliaments Joint Select Committee report on the how the government can develop a successful referendum. This factual evidence combined with his own subjective opinion enhances the evidence used in the…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia is a monarchy because it was colonized by the British in 1778. With them, they brought their lifestyles, culture and system of government. This type of government has remained up to this day. The reason why some Australians say that we should become a republic is because they believe that we have become independent as a country and own our own name, instead of being another part of Brittan. They believe that we need a change, considering that Australia has changed greatly since 1778.…

    • 809 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Honourable Prime Minister William Hughes has represented Australia on the world stage as a strong and independent nation. Firstly, Mr Hughes argued that Australia, and indeed other British nations be privately represented in President Wilson’s proposed League of Nations. Although a strong supporter of British rule, Mr Hughes noted that Australia’s considerable war effort justified the need for our nation to be independent in this regard. The Prime Minister also argued for compensation of Australia’s war costs, stating that Germany should pay for our war expenditures. Finally Mr Hughes lobbied against the inclusion of a clause to be included in the treaty guaranteeing the “Equality of nations and equal treatment of their nationals.”…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changing Work Patterns

    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gough Whitlam was the first Prime Minister of Australia to be dismissed from office, by the then-Governor-General Sir John Kerr. The dismissal was the most dramatic day in Australian political history, however the causes cannot be pinpointed to just one reason. Among other minor factors, it can be determined that the dismissal of Whitlam’s government was caused by the Senate’s acts of blocking supply and breaking political conventions, and the Governor-General’s actions against convention.…

    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia Australia is a democratic legislature. The Australian Parliament is bicameral, consisting of the Queen of Australia, a 76-member Senate and a 150-member House of Representatives. The Constitution provides for the Commonwealth Government's legislative powers and gives certain powers and responsibilities to the Commonwealth government. All remaining responsibilities are retained by the six States which were previously separate colonies. Each State has its own constitution, so that Australia has seven sovereign Parliaments, none of which can encroach on the functions of the others.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is my absolute pleasure to stand here and address the members of the House of Representatives for 2015. I am here to commemorate 40 years since the dismissal of the Whitlam Labor government in 1975, but specifically highlight and celebrate the major impacts of Whitlam’s government. Whether you agree that Gough Whitlam should have remained in leadership or have been dismissed, you cannot deny the significant impacts his policies had. Gough Whitlam and his government stated to the public of Australia that their program had three great aims, ‘they are: to promote equality, to involve the people of Australia in the decision-making processes of our land, and to liberate the talents and uplift the horizons of the Australian people.’ To achieve this, the Labor Government introduced new policies, which impacted all…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British Monarchy is a show piece that stands to represent the old ways of the world. They have been losing power gradually but steadily over the last two hundred years. In Australia their presence serves as merely ceremonial with a little political power that is seldom used. However removing the monarchy from the structure of our country would mean losing sporting opportunities, relations with UK and an affinity with our culture as an English colony which steadily grew from rags to riches under hard circumstances.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carney's Argument Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue of changing Australia’s flag and to become a republic has once again created discussion and subsequent debate across the Australian community.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The journey toward Australia’s legal independence has been characterized by evolution not revolution, hence the lack of any one event and consequently a particular date to celebrate Australia’s legal independence. No particular dramatic event marked Australia’s gaining independence from England, Australian independence was gradual and incredibly slow, and in fact some would argue that it is still not wholly independent owing to residual links and the continuation of a British monarch as the Australian head of state. Australian independence has been reached through largely informal progress with key moments being legal and political milestones enshrined in the statutes of the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia respectively. Examples of these statutes include the Statute of…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Australia should not become a republic. I think that there would be no point in becoming a republic, because we live without the intervention of the Queen at the moment, so becoming a republic would achieve nothing. If we were to become a republic, we would lose the support of England in times of war, famine or other disaster. I think that becoming a republic would achieve nothing, lose our links with England and waste the parliament's time when they should be concerned with more important issues.<br><br>If we were to become a republic, the governor general would be replaced by a president who would have the same powers and responsibilities as our Governor General, so only the name and the person holding the position would change, wasting important parliament time and achieving absolutely nothing. At the present time, there is nothing wrong with the constitution, and if there was anything wrong with it, it could be changed by referendum, once again proving that becoming a republic is pointless. Currently, we are not tied down at all by the monarchy, and although the Queen does have the power to intervene in the running of our country, she doesn't out of tradition, and therefore, probably never will, bound by the tradition. <br><br>If we become a republic, we would lose valuable ties with England and perhaps part of our heritage that goes with it. England can support us through many unfortunate events that we may face and England, being on the other side of the world may not, putting them in a position to offer us financial, military or other support. If we were to become a republic would we forget that the English were the first people to colonise our country, and instead of learning about the colonisation of our country, learn about the way in which we broke free from England and the monarchy? We owe our existence in Australia to the English and we are treated very well by them - they let us manage our own affairs and don't interrupt in the running…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Macquarie Dictionary). In a republic a head of state is a citizen of that country elected by fellow citizens. If birthright determines the head of state of a country then that country is a monarchy, which at the moment Australia is. Our head of state is currently the Queen, but the Governor-General, who is appointed by the federal government (does not need to be an Australian) represents her. We are a monarchy because of Britain’s colonisation of Australia in 1778. The British brought their way of life, culture and most importantly their way of government with them. This system of government has remained to this day. Becoming a republic would not mean that we would lose that history we have with Britain and that if we were to become a fully independent nation it would not severe ties. The Queen has also stated that this was an issue that should be left for Australians to decide.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, Australia's parliamentary system is entirely dissimilar to America's. Australia has a proportional voting system, and their voting process is very complex. The voters there rank candidates by preference. Australia also has over two political parties representing themselves in its government. Also, Australia’s voters do not appear to be anymore politically educated than America’s voters. Attempting to compare America's voting system to Australia's voting system like trying to fit a triangle in a circular hole. What would happen to Australia if voting became voluntary again? In the Netherlands, where voting was compulsory between 1917 and 1971 and then became voluntary, the average turnout fell from 94.7 per cent to 81.4 per cent. If Australia was to enact a non-mandatory voting system, it would be expected to amount to about 1.5 million fewer votes during a national election. In the end, this is unlikely to make much a change in electoral results. However, it could shake up the political standards for the country.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: nderson, L. Low, A. Conroy, J and Keese, I. Retroactive 2 John Wiley and son Ltd Sydney 2000Attwood, Bain and Markus Andrew. The 1967 referendum: race, power,and australian constitution. http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/7892/teachers_notes.pdf (12/02/09)…

    • 736 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Monarchy In Canada

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Canada continues to need as many historically based structures as possible to distinguish the country from its burgeoning, warmongering and oh-so-greedy neighbor to the south. The monarchy is an essential aspect to the functioning of an independent Canada. Make no mistake about it, a republic of Canada would be riper for absorption into the States, a move that would be led by conservative…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays