Preview

Australopithecus Vs. Paranthropus

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Australopithecus Vs. Paranthropus
Scientists have had much difficulty interpreting the phylogenetic relationships of the Black Skull because it is comprised of both primitive features and derived ones. It has a very small brain volume, a large sagittal crest, and the upper face projects considerably. All of these traits place it in the early Australopithecus afarensis grouping. However, the Black Skull also features derived traits associated with later robust hominids. This includes such traits as a broad face, a large palate, and a large area for the back teeth. Thus, a clear understanding of where this skull belongs becomes troublesome and a new species, Paranthropus aethiopicus, has been created for the skull.

Australopithecines can be defined as hominids from the Plio-Pleistocene era in Africa characterized by bipedal locomotion and a relatively small brain. Paranthropucines are similar to Australopithecines except they are defined as more robust, that is they have much larger teeth and larger jaws meant to process tough foods. The Mystery Specimen from Station 5 resembles both Australopithecus afarensis and Paranthropus boisei, but because it has a sagittal crest, it must be a Paranthropus. It's primitive features are slight prognathism and a relatively small neurocranium. Its derived features include large molars, a wide flat face, and a sagittal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Postorbital ring 2. Dental comb 3. Tapetum Lucidum Tarsiers more like monkeys in their genetics Primate Fossil Ancestry: Events Preceding Primates Ca. 500 MYA: first vertebrates in fossil record Ca. 250 MYA: Pangea II forms- nearly all land is one big continent Ca.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uakari Tibia

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I. Methodology- The lab over Inferring behavior from teeth and bones helps the students in analyzing the various types of bone structures that are prevalent in various types of primates. Such as in the beginning of the lab we were given three different casts of different primate species that were in a wooden box that contained a cast of the skull and mandible for all three species also specimen’s A & B had a tibia, fibula, radius, and an ulna that went along with their cast of their skulls. While performing the lab, the students had to identify the dental formula for each of the three species and determine the primate group the species belong to. Such as if the dental formula matched up with a Ateloidea superfamily which represents all the new world monkeys the dental formula would be a 2.1.3.3 for both the mandible and the maxilla of the primate skull.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Until 1971, an understanding of the history of Australia's platypus was non-existent. Apart from the fact that it was a monotreme and only known from Australia, all else was mystery. Then three major discoveries were made: two molar teeth of Obdurodon insignis, a 25 million-year-old platypus from the Tirari desert; a jaw fragment with three teeth of sterepodan galmani a 110 million year old monotreme from opal deposits at Lightning Ridge, New South Wales; and, from 15-20-million-year-old Riversleigh deposits, a complete skull as well as a nearly complete dentition of a second species…

    • 918 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7 million '' 10,000 B.C.E. |Fossil remains of near-human or proto-human creature known as Hominids…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australopithecus- an extinct genus of small-brained, large-toothed bipedal hominids that live in Africa between one and four million years ago.…

    • 2340 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Obudrodon Dicksoni

    • 7116 Words
    • 29 Pages

    This thesis began as an investigation into evolution of the platypus family (Ornithorhynchidae, Monotremata), now known from both Australia and South America. The thesis broadened its scope with inclusion of non-ornithorhynchid Mesozoic monotremes from Lightning Ridge, NSW. This change in direction brought an unexpected result: a fossil mammal from Lightning Ridge investigated for this thesis (presumed to be monotreme: Flannery et al., 1995) appears to be a new and unique type of mammal. Specimens were procured through Queensland Museum (Riversleigh material); Australian Museum (Lightning Ridge material); and Museum of Victoria and the South Australian Museum (fossil ornithorhynchids). Specimens were examined under a light microscope and scanning electron microscope; specimens were photographed using light photography and a scanning electron microscope; and illustrations and reconstructions were done with a camera lucida microscope attachment and photographic references. Parsimony analysis utilised the computer programs PAUP and MacClade. Major conclusions: 1) analysis and reconstruction of the skull of the Miocene platypus Obdurodon dicksoni suggest this robust, large-billed platypus was a derived northern offshoot off the main line of ornithorhynchid evolution; 2) the well-preserved skull of Obdurodon dicksoni shows aspects of soft anatomy previously unknown for fossil ornithorhynchids; 3) two upper molars from Mammalon Hill (Etadunna Formation, late Oligocene, central Australia) represent a third species of Obdurodon; 4) the South American ornithorhynchid Monotrematum sudamericanum from the Paleocene of Argentina is very close in form to the Oligocene-Miocene Obdurodon species…

    • 7116 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * A creature belonging to the family Hominidae, which includes human and humanlike species. * Australopithecus genus evolved in eastern Africa…

    • 3704 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods in Evolutionary Anthro & Archaeology Early Hominins Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis Reading week - no class…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Empirical evidence that supports speech capabilities among H. neandertal could mean origins of modern language, larger cultural leaps than once thought and a variety of social relationships among these archaic Homo Sapiens . It is generally agreed that origins of language are closely tied to the origins of modern human behavior, although there is little agreement on the implications. The discovery of the hyoid bone, reconstructions of the vocal tract including the cranial base and the larynx, the DNA sequence of H. neandertal that carried the FOXP2 gene (fork head box protein) and is known as the…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sahelanthropus tchadensis has a skull with an elongated shape with a relatively short, vertical face, which is set high relative to the skull vault. The eyes are set far apart from each other and have a very large continuous bony brow ridge above them. Examination of the lower jaw reveals that Sahelanthropus had a total of thirty two teeth, which is common in all Old World monkeys, apes, and humans. The foramen magnum (where the skull opens for spinal cord passage) is positioned forward and oriented downward. Sahelanthropus has a nose opening that a midline reaches down to the bony palate, as seen in gibbons and monkeys. By contrast, humans and African apes have a nose opening that is set well above the mouth even at its midline.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the moment humans were created to modern times, they made numerous physical and technological advancements. It started when the Australopithecines began displaying signs of bipedalism, freeing two arms for using tools and carrying food while walking at the same time. This was a significant physical change that the hominid species chose to make, as bipedalism was the gateway to hunting, farming, and harvesting. As time passed, the homo habilis began showing up. Their brain size was on a range between 550 and 687 cubic centimeters, whereas the Australopithecines had a brain size between 350 and 600 cubic centimeters, which meant that the homo habilis' brain capacity grew around 50%. This larger brain capacity led to the experimentation with…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ardipithecus Ramidus

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ardipithecus ramidus weighed about 50 kg and stood about 120 cm tall (). In the circumstances of the other saved hominids of this particular species, this suggested small body size difference between both males and females (). Ardi's brain size was as small as those of the living chimpanzees with regard to their mobility and dietary adaptations (). The numerous saved teeth and enormous complete cranium revealed that Ardipithecus ramidus had a small face including a reduced canine/premolar complex ().…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    in Kenya in 1947, Mary Leakey discovered the skull of Proconsul africanus, an ape-like ancestor of both apes and prehistoric man that ived about 25 million years ago.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Evolution Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A group of scientists lead by Biren Patel have recently found a partial mandible of an ancient primate related to lemurs. Scientists have named the new species Ramadapis sahnii and claim that it existed 11 to 14 million years ago, and is a member of the early primate family Sivaladapidae. Analysis of the jawbone shows that the species consumed leaves and was approximately the same size as a house cat, or to a modern day lemur. This discovery is important to the scientific community as with this discovery more information surrounding the evolutionary history of primates can be gathered and analysed. This new species will also help expand the phylogenetic tree for primates, making it significant to any scientist researching primate evolution.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays