Preview

Authoritarian Leadership

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Authoritarian Leadership
To begin this discussion, let us first define the key terms needed. Authoritarian is a "type of government which the ruler demand unquestioning obedience from its people" that they govern.(Macmillan 30). In other words, the people who are being ruled, have no choice but to be obedient to their leader even if they do not agree with him or her. While democracy can be defined in Greek as "rule by the people." In other words, it is based on the people 's votes, where the majority votes wins, whereas, if an election is to be held, with regards to a decision, for example capital punishment, if majority of the voters agree to it, then capital punishment will take effect as a means of punishing criminals. Usually, the Executive which is said to reflect a semi-presidential system, has two main roles where the president is elected directly by the people and the Prime Minister appointed by the president. This is evident in post-communist Russia, when President Putin was elected by the people in adult suffrage elections. This system creates "a certain amount of tension between the president and the prime minister, especially if they do not share the same political party or the same political ideas." (Munroe 91). This is evident when Voloshin resigned while Yeltsin was in power and was later reappointed by Putin after Yeltsin had resigned. Post communist Russia is deemed as being more authoritarian than democratic as its governmental style has more characteristics of that of authoritarian, where its president has more power than other official posts in its society. The structure of the Post communist Russia differs significantly from that of the former soviet union. It has been characterized by a power struggle between the executive and the legislature branches, primarily over issues of constitutional authority and the pace and direction of democratic and economic reform. Conflicts started in September 2003, when President Yeltsin dissolved the Russian parliament (the


Cited: Britanica.com: Administration and Social Conditions Munroe, Trevor. An Introduction to Politics.Third Edition, 2002 Mclean, Iain, ed.The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics.Oxford Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before taking over as President, Vladimir Putin rose to the top of the ranks of the Russian government after joining President Boris Yeltsin’s administration in 1998, and became prime minister in 1999. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, he retired with the rank of colonel, and returned to becoming a liberal politician. In December of 1999 Yeltsin resigned as president, appointing Putin as president until official elections were held in early 2000. As President he sought to end corruption and create a strongly regulated market…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand which form of regimes are the most stable its important to look at certain factors that can destabilise the authoritarian regimes.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    You are an HR manager working for a large IT solutions firm in the UK. Your organisation has been experiencing a high degree of labour turnover across the organisation. This prompted you to devise and distribute an employee survey. The findings of this survey revealed low morale across the various departments and in particular a poor perception of leadership within the business. Discuss the changing nature of leadership and the policies and practices that you could design and implement to ensure good leadership in the future.…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Totalitarian government is one person dictates what the entire government does. Authoritarian is a step below totalitarian. It still does what it wants mostly, but some social parties can still influence the authoritarian government. While a constitutional democracy has a limited government. It is influenced by popular votes or influences that help shape the decisions of government more or less directly.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life under an authoritarian government would be horrifically empty. An authoritarian government controls everything in your life. They control the information you see, the help you receive, where you can go, and even the food you eat. This restricts learning, growth, and the human spirit. In North Korea the citizens see Kim as a God. One blind woman wished to see him so badly she cried just thinking about it. The only photos in houses are that of the Kim, and children sing praise songs. Moreover, the people live in a relative black hole of information, they don’t have cell phones or internet. Some don’t know a man has walked on the moon. Furthermore, there is poor medicare, with bloodied operating tables, and beer bottles as IVs in some health…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let’s talk a little but about how Russia was before Stalin came into power and changed up the whole game for Russia. As soon as the Czar of Russia (Nicholas II) was kicked off his throne, Russia’s peasant population came strong and in numbers. These peasants all set up something that was called the Provisional Government. The Provisional Government was formed in Petrograd, and was led first by Prince Georgy L'vov and then by socialist Alexander Kerensky, a prominent…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a government where the people rule and have rights, whereas absolutism is a government with one ruler and the people have limited rights. Absolutism was the most effective form of government from the 1500s to the 1800s because society needed guidance and monarchs had the power to do what was fit for their country. This particular period was a time of change not only in the government but in the areas of science, art, technology, and religion as well. Since there was so much change in society, there needed to be an effective form of government to guide the people. Absolutism, therefore, was the most effective form of government for the people from the 1500s to the 1800s.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With that stated, what kind of authoritarian government is best? Personalist would not work unless you have someone in power who would love to partake in a cult of personality. Even if one has that, the system is very unstable. What happens when the leader dies? How would power be transferred? Even then, how many people would be willing to partake in the cult of personality? There would have to be a lot of limiting of free speech and a lot of human rights violations to justify this kind of system, and going straight into it from a democracy is extremely dicey. Military rule also seems like a good idea but is subject to the same faults as…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authoritarian leader has the need to maintain control of the group and the democratic leader represents an attempt to find a reasonable compromise between the other two extremes. The democratic leader does attempt to provide direction and to perform both task and social leadership functions (Smith, 2012, pp. 240-241). This leader had to be both because he was directly responsible for lives in certain situations, he had to be direct and unquestioned. Yet, there was time he needed and wanted input from his subordinates.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authoritarian leaders are characterized as maintaining active control over the work group, motivating by coercion, directing with commands, and communicating in a downward flow (Marquis & Huston, 2013). An authoritarian leader also does not include others when making decisions and uses criticism as punishment (Marquis & Huston, 2013). My current manager communicates in a downward flow only and does not allow communication to flow upward. Her manager style is a dictatorship where the staff members are not included in goal setting. The manager decides what goals are to be achieved and the staff is controlled and motivated by coercion. She directs all activities without any meaningful participation from subordinates. Most staff members are productive,…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy, by far, is viewed as being a much more equal, reliable and honest form of government organisation, to comparison with a monarchy or a dictatorship, where the individuals of a state have very little or no say at all to the ruling and management of their country.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Russian constitution is written everything about how the president should behave himself. As an example in UK constitution it isn’t written anything about what PM or Queen should behave them. And in UK constitution some rules aren’t written and clarified and this is lead to some curios and strange situations.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays