Preview

Autocratic Versus Democratic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Autocratic Versus Democratic
Leadership Styles – Autocratic versus Democratic
Today’s business organization whether it is large or small is concerned with the financial bottom line. One of its most valuable assets is the human asset. Corporations spend large percentages of their budget on HR personnel and even greater percentages on their management staff. How and why they choose their managers is critical to the maintenance and sustainability of the business organization, its culture and its success. The examination and exploration into different management styles has been disjointed and inconsistent at best. The key to good management and leadership growth is a good knowledge foundation. There are various management styles. This paper will contrast and compare the autocratic and democratic advantages and disadvantages commonly related to each and what works in best depending on the business type and organizational structure.
Autocratic Management
What’s Autocratic Leadership? Autocratic leadership is a traditional leadership type with very distinct characteristics: 1. The Manager makes all the decision and selections of work.
2. The Manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making.
3. The Manager retains responsibility rather than make the most of delegation.
4. The Manager minimizes involvement with other managers in order make independent decision.
5. The Manager is not vested in their leadership growth, and prefers to work on the easy assignment at hand.
Autocratic leadership is seen as an old fashioned management method. As long as managers have commanded subordinates, it has existed and it is still employed by many organizational leaders worldwide. The rationalization autocratic leadership still survives, or even if it’s outdated, is because it’s discerning, carries immediate benefits, and comes untainted to many leaders. Many managers who pursue leadership development are frequently trying to enhance upon the autocratic leadership style.

The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is often considered a classic leadership style and is used when a leader wished to retain as much power as possible and maintain control over the decision – making process. It involves the leader telling the team members what they must do without any form of consultation or negotiation. The…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hcs 220

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leadership can be formal or informal. Formal leadership can depend on the personal skills of an individual or be reinforcing by authority and position. Informal leadership can be expressive in an individual who does not have a specified management role (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). Both roles are important to any organization that wants to form a good organizational culture and foundation. Sullivan & Decker (2009), address four leadership styles authoritarian, democratic, permissive, and bureaucratic, which have their strengths and weaknesses. Authoritarian has the leadership characteristics of using directive behavior and strives on goal accomplishments rather than relationships. Democratic has the leadership characteristics opposite of authoritarian as this individual has concerns with building relationship and strives for open communication (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This provides teams to collaborate effectively with team satisfaction. Permissive leaders tend not to have a good foundation of established policies and works off impulses. The bureaucratic style of leadership lacks security and depends solely on the rules and polices set (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This individual avoids decision-making and “exercises power by applying fixed, relatively inflexible rules” (Sullivan & Decker, 2009).Through the review of this paper it will explain the leadership style of democratic and authoritarian as they are applied to Pat DeCesare in her successful leadership role. Pat has been in management for over 30 years and has a successful track record of taking her departments to the next level.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    AUTHORITARIAN: This style is also know as Autocratic Leadership, it is a dictatorial method of leading, low concern for followers and high emphasis on task, typically reinforced with threat, punishment, and often ruthless exploitation of workers, who have little or no freedom to resist or desert. This style is used when the leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the employees.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    spector, P. E., & spector, P. E. (2008). Industrial/organizational psychology research and practice, 5th edition. In Mc graw Hill. Retrieved https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspxhttp://ecoggins.hubpages.com/hub/Barack-Obamas-Leadership-Style.ecoggins.hubpages.com/hub/Barack-Obamas-Leadership-Styleshttp://www.planetofsuccess.com/blog/2010/how-to-deal-with-autocratic-leadership/Goleman. (2000). leadership that brings results.www.hbr.org…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The authoritative style of leadership, also known as autocratic, is a style where leaders provide their expectations of what needs to be done and how. The authoritarian leader typically makes his decision without input from the group. This type of leader is seen as bossy and controlling.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each and every one of us has come across excellent leaders in our work centers and in life. These types of people leave a lasting impression on us and we forever remember their names. We learn from these leaders and we grow from these leaders. From their efforts we become great leaders ourselves. There are many types of leadership styles ranging from autocratic leadership to bureaucratic leadership, servant leadership to transformation leadership, and from democratic…

    • 2925 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Strengths of Autocratic Leadership Style are that they have improbable efficient choices made instantly. They get their work done as efficient and quick as possible. Their weaknesses are that some team members are not up to doing work as quick…

    • 4932 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The differences of an authoritarian government and our democracy. Authoritarian government rulers inherit their positions or take power by force. Authoritarian government rulers are always unlimited and impose an official ideology and control all aspects of political, economic, and civic life. From our democracy leaders are chosen fairly with respect and freedom.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic vs. Democratic

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The company I work for has been providing aviation services for more than thirty years. They started out as the first FBO (Fixed Base Operation) in Mobile, Alabama, and have since grown within the aviation industry; providing services to all aspects of the business.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ilm level 3

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived as a dictator, domineering and aggressive behaviour. An autocratic leadership can be beneficial in some circumstances such as that decisions have to be made quickly without consulting anyone, also when projects sometimes require strong leadership so that things can get accomplished quickly and effectively. Some team members may actually prefer the autocratic style this can let the team focus on performing tasks without worrying about the decisions that have to be made, this style of management does have its problems managers / team leaders can learn to use the elements of this style wisely and correctly. As an example autocratic management can be used effectively when the leader has the most knowledge and has access to information that can make the task more productive. This style of management is best used when the team are primarily unskilled workers, casual workers or new starters.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rte1

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The leadership style I use is a mixture of autocratic and democratic and is situational dependent. I feel it is an effective style due to the very nature of my work. If something has to be done quickly and without thought on my subordinates’ part, I tend to be very autocratic so they are able to focus on what actually needs to be done and not get caught up in trying to decide what the best course of action is. On the contrary, if there is time for decisions to be made, and, especially if the decision is one that will affect more than myself, I try and get input from everyone to get their thoughts. I think this is the best way to get people to buy-in to a process and take a bit of ownership with it.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authoritarian Versus Democracy, what’s the difference? In an Authoritarian Democracy there is only one ruler or a small group of rulers as The democracy in the U.S. has a president and a congress to go through before the law is made final. An Authoritarian government has only one Leader, known as a king/Queen that inherits the title of King/Queen or takes it over by force. In Our Democracy we as a whole elect our “leader” known as a president, as of now it’s Donald Trump.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a government of the people, for the people, by the people. In this government, people are the rulers and the ruled. Government is formed through elections. All the adult citizens cast votes and elect their representatives. This democracy is run through their elected representatives. Dictatorship is a form of government in where there’s a centralization of power. All power rests in the hands of one person. The people have no say in what goes on.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays