The objective of this memo is to discuss the predictions of automobile sales in the US for the month of March 2012. The prediction is to take into account the historic data (provided) and current marketing environment.
At first, two approaches of the analytical (quantitative) method were used – moving average and exponential smoothing. The objective of doing so was to get an idea of the prediction based on historic data only. Once that was done, the marketing environment was taken into consideration - to see how it would effect the predictions made by the models. In general, there are a lot of underlying factors to consider when doing a sales forecast – mainly categorized into controllable and uncontrollable factors. Since this forecast is covers all automobile sales, not just for a particular company, it is safe to say that the controllable factors can be ignored (product mix, prices etc.). However, uncontrollable factors have a big play on this forecast – economy, interest rates, gas prices, industry trends etc.
As discussed earlier, the first step was to perform the two analytical approaches. These two approaches smoothed the data and found the underlying trend behind the noise. Table 1 and Table 2 in the Appendix shows the steps used to formulate this trend. Actual sales, the moving average and exponential smoothing are shown in Chart 1 in the Appendix. Purely based on this, the moving average would predict the March ’12 forecast to be 535,662 where as the exponential smoothing would predict it to be 574,439.
The automotive industry bases the sales predictions on the 3C’s – Cash, credit and confidence (www.autoobserver.com). It is a known that our economy is down. However, the unemployment rate is decreasing and it seems that the confidence is increasing. Having said all that, this factor itself has not changed any more than what is already accounted for in the model. The biggest factor, it appears, is the escalating gas prices this year. The gas prices are already high, and are expected to go up even more through the summer. This has to affect the prediction, more so than reflected by the model. To see how much (quantitatively) gas prices affect the sales, one must look at the history. Chart 5 shows average gas price in the last 4 years. This chart shows that a similar peak in gas prices was also observed in May/June 2011. Table 3 was created to see the percentage change (over the previous month). It is seen that there was a +12.62% increase in May 2009 and +12.48% increase in May 2010 over April 2009 and April 2010 respectively. Continuing in the same trend of month over month, one would have expected May 2011 to have an approximate sales increase by ~ 12%. Instead, May 2011 underwent a -10.42% change over April 2011; which is approximately 22% lower than the usual growth expected in May. This interestingly coincides perfectly with the spike in gas prices. Using this trend, the average trend in March of the past 2 years is an increase of 34% (35.52% increase in 2010 and 33.12% increase in 2011). So if the similar effect of gas prices is to be seen again, March 2012 should see 11% increase only (34 – 22) over February 2012 sales. This calculates to give a sales prediction of 665,971 in March 2012 (1.11 X 599,974).
In conclusion, even though the moving average and exponential smoothing models by themselves predict the sales in March 2012 to be 535,662 and 574,439 – I choose the prediction of 665,971, which adjusts the models for the gas prices spike and economic impacts.
APPENDIX
TABLE 1: Calculations for Moving Average
|PERIOD |YEAR |MONTH |SALES |Moving Average (3 |Calculations - Moving average (3 periods) |
| | | | |periods) | |
|1 |2009 |MAR |445595 | | |
|2 | |APR |429770 | | |
|3 | |MAY |484028 | | |
|4 | |JUN |456206 |453131 | =((445595 + 429770 + 484028) / 3) |
|5 | |JUL |550388 |456668 |=((429770 + 484028 + 456206) / 3) |
|6 | |AUG |720483 |496874 |=((484028 + 456206 + 550388) / 3) |
|7 | |SEP |398235 |575692 |=((456206 + 550388 + 720483) / 3) |
|8 | |OCT |427325 |556369 |=((550388 + 720483 + 398235) / 3) |
|9 | |NOV |374677 |515348 |=((720483 + 398235 + 427325) / 3) |
|10 | |DEC |512566 |400079 |=((398235 + 427325 + 374677) / 3) |
|11 |2010 |JAN |361660 |438189 |=((427325 + 374677 + 512566) / 3) |
|12 | |FEB |399245 |416301 |=((374677 + 512566 + 361660) / 3) |
|13 | |MAR |541042 |424490 |=((512566 + 361660 + 399245) / 3) |
|14 | |APR |493565 |433982 |=((361660 + 399245 + 541042) / 3) |
|15 | |MAY |555153 |477951 |=((399245 + 541042 + 493565) / 3) |
|16 | |JUN |493473 |529920 |=((541042 + 493565 + 555153) / 3) |
|17 | |JUL |514943 |514064 |=((493565 + 555153 + 493473) / 3) |
|18 | |AUG |490791 |521190 |=((555153 + 493473 + 514943) / 3) |
|19 | |SEP |463202 |499736 |=((493473 + 514943 + 490791) / 3) |
|20 | |OCT |436354 |489645 |=((514943 + 490791 + 463202) / 3) |
|21 | |NOV |395689 |463449 |=((490791 + 463202 + 436354) / 3) |
|22 | |DEC |509591 |431748 |=((463202 + 436354 + 395689) / 3) |
|23 |2011 |JAN |380313 |447211 |=((436354 + 395689 + 509591) / 3) |
|24 | |FEB |482540 |428531 |=((395689 + 509591 + 380313) / 3) |
|25 | |MAR |642347 |457481 |=((509591 + 380313 + 482540) / 3) |
|26 | |APR |598627 |501733 |=((380313 + 482540 + 642347) / 3) |
|27 | |MAY |535075 |574505 |=((482540 + 642347 + 598627) / 3) |
|28 | |JUN |516588 |592016 |=((642347 + 598627 + 535075) / 3) |
|29 | |JUL |495603 |550097 |=((598627 + 535075 + 516588) / 3) |
|30 | |AUG |498090 |515755 |=((535075 + 516588 + 495603) / 3) |
|31 | |SEP |475519 |503427 |=((516588 + 495603 + 498090) / 3) |
|32 | |OCT |468533 |489737 |=((495603 + 498090 + 475519) / 3) |
|33 | |NOV |452482 |480714 |=((498090 + 475519 + 468533) / 3) |
|34 | |DEC |549306 |465511 |=((475519 + 468533 + 452482) / 3) |
|35 |2012 |JAN |457705 |490107 |=((468533 + 452482 + 549306) / 3) |
|36 | |FEB |599974 |486498 |=((452482 + 549306 + 457705) / 3) |
|37 | |MAR | |535662 |=((549306 + 457705 + 599974) / 3) |
Table 2: Calculations for Exponential Smoothing
|PERIOD |YEAR |MONTH |SALES |Exp Smoothing (a=0.8) |Calculations - Exp. Smoothing (a = 0.8) |
|1 |2009 |MAR |445595 | | |
|2 | |APR |429770 |445595 | |
|3 | |MAY |484028 |432935 |=(0.8)(429770) + (0.2)(445595) |
|4 | |JUN |456206 |473809 |=(0.8)(484028) + (0.2)(432935) |
|5 | |JUL |550388 |459727 |=(0.8)(456206) + (0.2)(473809) |
|6 | |AUG |720483 |532256 |=(0.8)(550388) + (0.2)(459727) |
|7 | |SEP |398235 |682838 |=(0.8)(720483) + (0.2)(532256) |
|8 | |OCT |427325 |455156 |=(0.8)(398235) + (0.2)(682838) |
|9 | |NOV |374677 |432891 |=(0.8)(427325) + (0.2)(455156) |
|10 | |DEC |512566 |386320 |=(0.8)(374677) + (0.2)(432891) |
|11 |2010 |JAN |361660 |487317 |=(0.8)(512566) + (0.2)(386320) |
|12 | |FEB |399245 |386791 |=(0.8)(361660) + (0.2)(487317) |
|13 | |MAR |541042 |396754 |=(0.8)(399245) + (0.2)(386791) |
|14 | |APR |493565 |512184 |=(0.8)(541042) + (0.2)(396754) |
|15 | |MAY |555153 |497289 |=(0.8)(493565) + (0.2)(512184) |
|16 | |JUN |493473 |543580 |=(0.8)(555153) + (0.2)(497289) |
|17 | |JUL |514943 |503494 |=(0.8)(493473) + (0.2)(543580) |
|18 | |AUG |490791 |512653 |=(0.8)(514943) + (0.2)(503494) |
|19 | |SEP |463202 |495163 |=(0.8)(490791) + (0.2)(512653) |
|20 | |OCT |436354 |469594 |=(0.8)(463202) + (0.2)(495163) |
|21 | |NOV |395689 |443002 |=(0.8)(436354) + (0.2)(469594) |
|22 | |DEC |509591 |405152 |=(0.8)(395689) + (0.2)(443002) |
|23 |2011 |JAN |380313 |488703 |=(0.8)(509591) + (0.2)(405152) |
|24 | |FEB |482540 |401991 |=(0.8)(380313) + (0.2)(488703) |
|25 | |MAR |642347 |466430 |=(0.8)(482540) + (0.2)(401991) |
|26 | |APR |598627 |607164 |=(0.8)(642347) + (0.2)(466430) |
|27 | |MAY |535075 |600334 |=(0.8)(598627) + (0.2)(607164) |
|28 | |JUN |516588 |548127 |=(0.8)(535075) + (0.2)(600334) |
|29 | |JUL |495603 |522896 |=(0.8)(516588) + (0.2)(548127) |
|30 | |AUG |498090 |501062 |=(0.8)(495603) + (0.2)(522896) |
|31 | |SEP |475519 |498684 |=(0.8)(498090) + (0.2)(501062) |
|32 | |OCT |468533 |480152 |=(0.8)(475519) + (0.2)(498684) |
|33 | |NOV |452482 |470857 |=(0.8)(468533) + (0.2)(480152) |
|34 | |DEC |549306 |456157 |=(0.8)(452482) + (0.2)(470857) |
|35 |2012 |JAN |457705 |530676 |=(0.8)(549306) + (0.2)(456157) |
|36 | |FEB |599974 |472299 |=(0.8)(457705) + (0.2)(530676) |
|37 | |MAR | |574439 |=(0.8)(599974) + (0.2)(472299) |
Table 3: Sales and Percentage change over previous month
|PERIOD |YEAR |MONTH |SALES |Percentage change over |
| | | | |previous month |
|1 |2009 |MAR |445595 | |
|2 | |APR |429770 |-3.55% |
|3 | |MAY |484028 |12.62% |
|4 | |JUN |456206 |-5.75% |
|5 | |JUL |550388 |20.64% |
|6 | |AUG |720483 |30.9% |
|7 | |SEP |398235 |-44.73% |
|8 | |OCT |427325 |7.3% |
|9 | |NOV |374677 |-12.32% |
|10 | |DEC |512566 |36.8% |
|11 |2010 |JAN |361660 |-29.44% |
|12 | |FEB |399245 |10.39% |
|13 | |MAR |541042 |35.52% |
|14 | |APR |493565 |-8.78% |
|15 | |MAY |555153 |12.48% |
|16 | |JUN |493473 |-11.11% |
|17 | |JUL |514943 |4.35% |
|18 | |AUG |490791 |-4.69% |
|19 | |SEP |463202 |-5.62% |
|20 | |OCT |436354 |-5.8% |
|21 | |NOV |395689 |-9.32% |
|22 | |DEC |509591 |28.79% |
|23 |2011 |JAN |380313 |-25.37% |
|24 | |FEB |482540 |26.88% |
|25 | |MAR |642347 |33.12% |
|26 | |APR |598627 |-6.81% |
|27 | |MAY |535075 |-10.62% |
|28 | |JUN |516588 |-3.46% |
|29 | |JUL |495603 |-4.06% |
|30 | |AUG |498090 |0.5% |
|31 | |SEP |475519 |-4.53% |
|32 | |OCT |468533 |-1.47% |
|33 | |NOV |452482 |-3.43% |
|34 | |DEC |549306 |21.4% |
|35 |2012 |JAN |457705 |-16.68% |
|36 | |FEB |599974 |31.08% |
|37 | |MAR | | |
Chart 1: All plots (sales, moving average & exponential smoothing)
[pic]
Chart 2: Actual Sales
[pic]
Chart 3: Moving average
[pic]
Chart 4: Exponential Smoothing
[pic]
Chart 5: Gas Price History (source: http://gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx)
[pic]
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The marketing team creates the forecast by month for the next year. The forecast is always over inflated. They do not seem to have a scientific forecasting process. They marketing team, meets with the sales managers from the different regions to get an idea of the sales from last year. They take into account economic changes and shortages they had…
- 597 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
| * Consumers demand for these vehicles remained unclear * Product of capacity of manufacturers was limited which affected their supply * U.S. economic growth in 2011 was sluggish * Competition is projected to increase dramatically * Automobile…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to the Wall Street Journal, the amount of global automotive will have a 4% growth in 2014, while the American and European markets also have 3% growth in 2014 (2014). This means that the slow recovery of the global economy will drive the automotive consumer over global. With oil prices rising, more people are favoring economical vehicles, such as electric hybrid. Ford expects electric hybrid cars will occupy 20-30% of the car market next decade, therefore, Ford, Toyota, Nissan and other major car companies have launched their own electric hybrid car.…
- 1456 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I would choose to use the exponential smoothing forecast method. Exponential smoothing method is an average method that reacts more strongly to recent changes in demand than to more distant past data. Using this data will show how the forecast will react more strongly to immediate changes in the data. This is good to examine when dealing with seasonal patterns and trends that may be taking place. I would find this information very useful when examining the increased production of a product that appears to be higher in demand in the present than in the past Taylor (2011). For example, annual sales of toys will probably peak in the months of March and April, and perhaps during the summer with a much smaller peak. This pattern is likely to repeat every year, however, the relative amount of increase in sales during March may slowly change from year to year. During the month of march the sales for a particular toy may increase by 1 million dollars every year. We could add to our forecasts for every March the amount of 1 million dollars to account for this seasonal fluctuation.…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The industry as a whole is influenced by the economic demand for vehicles, this is characterised by the strength of the economy and the disposable incomes of the consumers.…
- 2328 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Trends Affecting the Industry The largest group of car buyers are the…
- 4353 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The current forecasting method is a spreadsheet called the Forecast Master, which lists the average weekly sales history for each product family by quarter and year. For each product family, they divide the total quarters in weeks to determine the average weekly sale per quarters. Then they plug in their expected demand for the five or six quarters.…
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When companies want to estimate the current market demand, they attempt to determine total market potential, area market potential, industry sales, and market share. Once marketers have estimated the demand, they will choose the level of marketing effort based on the expected level of sales. The company sales forecast is the expected level of company sales based on a chosen marketing plan and an assumed marketing environment.…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The influence of the automotive industry runs deep in the United States economy. The auto industry supports numerous jobs and economic benefits through related…
- 3894 Words
- 16 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this forecast, a constant increase in sales was used, which was found by taking the average increase between 1999 to 2000 and 2000 to 2001. Of course these sales figures might not be met in the future which would severely lower the overall profit after tax. With this in mind, it is important to be prepared to meet the possibility that this positive forecast might not be met and that more debt and liabilities will have to be paid off than expected. Figuring out what the future markets have in store for a company is always tricky to determine.…
- 1637 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
In the beginning of the century when oil crisis hits the U.S. automobile industry, people were discouraged to buy vehicles with low fuel efficiency. Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors which have overly invested in low fuel-economy vehicles, were inflexible and rigid in its ability to meet the demand of a changing market in a timely fashion. Therefore, the U.S. auto manufactories were forced to cut its profits and face a sale…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another factor that is very influential to the automotive industry is that of rising fuel costs. Higher oil prices have forced automotive manufactures to slash prices on their larger less gas efficient vehicles while at the same time raising the prices of highly efficient vehicles. Due to higher gas prices the demand for less efficient vehicles is low forcing the manufactures to slash prices in order for them to move the vehicles off their lots. The opposite is occurring to higher efficient vehicles. With the gas prices increasing the demand for higher efficient vehicles is increasing which means the manufactures can raise prices due to the higher demand. (Reuters [R], 2007, pg. 1) While fuel prices and cost cutting practices are a couple of…
- 2105 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Car manufacturers have adjusted their production and almost all vehicle-producing countries experienced a sharp drop in 2010 of output growth. The decline was particularly marked in Spain and Italy. United States, the decline of automobile consumption of durable goods and investment vehicle production businesses contributed 20 to 30% decline in production complete the second half of 2010. The current downturn in car sales appears more pronounced than the fundamentals such as revenue growth and…
- 1881 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Section 1: Identification of current forecasting techniques used in the demand forecasting of existing and new products. Section 2: Idenitification of a better forecasting technique which can ease the process and improve the reliability and accuracy of the sales forecast.…
- 1740 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This study aims to identify some of the macroeconomic variables and analyze the impact of these variables on the demand and supply of Toyota automobile vehicles in the U.S. The paper includes four to five years historical data of these variables accumulated and samples for this analysis. This analysis will also look at the long term correlation of these variables with Toyota car sales. Results shows that a slowdown in U.S income growth could short-circuit the surge in consumer spending including the sales of vehicles manufactured by the U.S automotive manufacturers, such as Toyota Motor Corporation…
- 2540 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays