Preview

BUSN-115 Week 3 Assignment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUSN-115 Week 3 Assignment
BUSN-115 Week 3 Assignment
Robert F. Adams
DeVry University

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to answer the provided prompt from my instructor completely and satisfactorily. This prompt is: “The United States has several laws that are intended to further fair, balanced, and competitive business practices. Do you think that such laws are effective? If so, why? If not, why not?” I will address a few topics and attempt to support my position with supporting facts found from reliable academically appropriate sources.

BUSN-115 Week 3 Assignment The United States of America has many laws to promote a fair, balanced, and competitive environment for businesses. This is partially accomplished through the Federal Trade Commission’s
…show more content…

The first antitrust law, the Sherman Act, was passed in 1890 and together with a pair of laws passed in 1914, the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Act, forms the core antitrust laws still in effect today. The Sherman Act outlaws monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize, as well as, restraint on trade. It was ruled by the Supreme Court that not all restraint on trade is outlawed, only unreasonable restraint on trade. Examples of this would be price fixing or the rigging of bids. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 established the Federal Trade Commission, but it also provided further antitrust guidance. The FTC Act supports the Sherman Act and provides room for further prosecution of those who violate the Sherman Act. Additionally it “…also reaches other practices that harm competition, but that may not fit neatly into categories of conduct formally prohibited by the Sherman Act.” 2 The only cases brought under the FTC Act are done so by the …show more content…

This is also very infuriating to many consumers. For example, you may look at your water bill, see that you’re getting hit with only the minimum charge, and it still seems high. If this was the case with your cable bill, you could do something about it. Sometimes it only takes the threat or possibility of leaving for another company to bring prices down, as in telling the cable company you will be moving to a satellite company due to the rate difference. With you water bill, from the beginning of this example, you don’t have that choice. The only alternative you have is to pay a very large sum of money to have a well drilled, bring in the equipment to use the well, such as the pump and filtration equipment, and have a septic tank installed. Following this, you then would have to get your house plumbing rerun from the company lines to your newly installed system. If you are a renter, then this option is usually not only not viable, but more than likely not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this, the government is trying to help facilitate competition in order to guarantee better prices for consumers and more of a chance for other firms to enter the industries. A group of organized farmers, called the Grangers, got together and pushed for government intervention in regulating the railroad industry. At the time, the railroad was charging ridiculous rates and the farmers could not afford to keep up with the prices in order to transport their products. The Interstate Commerce Act (1887) was the first attempt from the government to help regulate businesses. It was "devised to apply technical expertise and a semijudicial and less partisan approach to the regulation of complex affairs." It required the all railroads that passed through more than one state charge fair rates and handle their business in a just manner. It also made pools, discriminatory rates, drawbacks, and rebates illegal. From this act, the Interstate Commerce Commission was also introduced; one of their first orders of business was to ensure that companies were charging appropriate rates and to help prevent…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton antitrust act was passed in 1914. The act was drafted by Alabama Democrat Henry De Lamar Clayton. President Wilson instructed congress to come up with the act when he went into office in 1912. Wilson felt as though large companies had too many freedoms. The Act was put into effect to prohibit anticompetitive price discrimination, prohibit against certain tying and exclusive deal practices, expand power to private parties to sue and obtain triple damages, labor exemption that permitted union organizing, prohibition against ant compatible mergers. Company mergers have to go through the Federal Trade Commission and The Department of Justice for regulation to be approached. It is not uncommon for a merger to be disapproved. Like…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson supported antitrust regulations in which there would be governmental involvement yet overseen by the courts. The winner of the election of 1912, Woodrow Wilson laid the ground work for the Clayton Anti-Trust Act of 1914 and the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC). The Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 can be summarized as follow: …. “ Section one of the act declares that contract or conspiracy that restrains trade or commerce among U.S. states or with foreign nations is illegal.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Department of Justice pursues cases dealing with many aspects of the United States law system. One portion that they deal with is violations with the Antitrust laws. Anti trust laws were established to help the consumers and create competition, which create lower prices for products and services (Department of Justice, 2017 ). One of the three Antitrust Acts, the Sherman Act outlaws monopolies. There are currently two cases the Justice Department is working with that deal with monopolies, AMC’s acquisition of Carmike Cinemas and Foreign Exchange Dealers coming together to commit a Conspiracy. Both cases are interesting and have everything to do with anticompetitive behaviors leading to taking over a market.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under the Sherman act, Continental’s conduct was illegal because they were engaged in predatory pricing. This was caused by lowering their actual cost of bread for a temporary period to drive their competitor’s out of business or in this case, less shelf life or prominence in the stores..…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Egt Task 3

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Antitrust laws are federal and state government laws that regulate the conduct and organization or businesses. This helps promote fair competition for consumers. There are four main areas involving the antitrust laws that include agreements between competitors, contractual agreements between sellers and buyers, the restriction and maintenance of monopoly, and mergers. The Sherman Act, which is one of the main statutes, has a contract or agreement in the form of a trust, dealing with trade and commerce among numerous of states, or nations, is deemed illegal. Also, it states that any person who monopolize, or attempt to, conspire with any other person(s) to monopolize in trade commerce will be found guilty and charged with a felony. Both of these violations carry major penalties. For each corporation that violates the act may be fined up to $1 million. Likewise, any persons found guilty of a violation may be fined up to $100, 000 and/or imprisonment for up to three years. For corporations, it is hard to enforce this law due to lack of identification of a specific market to prove monopolization. It requires scrutiny of both the market and the product from the vantage point of both the consumer and other potential producers (Ecnomicae). The Clayton Antitrust Act added to the already existing antitrust law by forbidding things like price discrimination, “where the effect of numerous practices may be to drastically decrease competition or…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These was after the state of New York created the act to control price fixing mechanisms between dealers and farmers in a bid to create fair trading grounds. The state had however stated that any Company which sought to trade in New York would need to sign the clause. These would lead to Seelig Corporation protesting the move and file a case in the Supreme Court stating that the clause infringed on the commerce clause. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of seelig stating that creation of minimum price controls by States was unconstitutional and infringed on the rights of the commerce clause ("Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. – Case Brief Summary",…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to stop the establishment of monopolies, the Sherman Antitrust law was passed in 1890 by Congress. The Supreme Court made the decision that contracts would be illegal if they formed an “unreasonable restraint of trade.” The Sherman Antitrust law “ provides that no person shall monopolize, attempt to monopolize or conspire with another to monopolize interstate or foreign trade or commerce,…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Act of 1914, sought nothing but to simply strengthen the Sherman Act of 1890. This act, however, forbade corporations from receiving stock of others if doing so created monopolies; If an company broke the law, its officials could be tried and…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics Study Guide

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Clayton Anti-Trust Act 1914: it prevent firms from buying stock in competitors and from having directors serve on the board of competing firms.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DiLorenzo believed the Sherman Antitrust act was “ Protectionist at its roots” (pg141). The government was using this so that incompetent businesses would be protected. According to Dilorenzo there was no proof that monopolies were hurting the country. In fact , there was a deflation during the late 19th century , prices were decreasing which would benefit consumers . The Sherman Act support came from less competitive firms that wanted to break up their more successful rivals. An example Dilorenzo gave was cotton farms. They were upset that jute was being used to cover cotton bales instead of cotton. They petition government to restrain jute farmers. Small firms had more power than the big ones, because if big firms had as much power as Yellow…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The mission statement of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is “To prevent business practices that are anticompetitive or deceptive or unfair to consumers; to enhance informed consumer choice and public understanding of the competitive process; and to accomplish this without unduly burdening legitimate business activity” (About the FTC, n.d). The primary areas that FTC is responsible is making sure that the consumer is protected from unfair business practices to prevention of getting scammed. The other are that it focuses on is maintaining competition between companies. In other words, preventing monopolies to occur where one business dominates a certain product.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sherman Act Of 1890

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    375). In response to monopolies, cartels, and trusts, Congress passed two major pieces of legislation: the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. The Sherman Act is a federal statute passed in 1890. It was the first major legislation passed to address oppressive business practices associated with cartels and oppressive monopolies. The Clayton Act of 1914 simply sharpened and clarified the general provisions of the Sherman Act and regulates practices that are deemed harmful to fair competition; price fixing, exclusive contracts, tying agreements, mergers and acquisitions. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 prohibits unfair methods, acts, and practices of competition in interstate commerse. But more than anything, it established the Federal Trade Commission to police violation of the act and to enforce the Clayton and Federal Trade Commission Acts, as well. The Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 amended the Clayton Act and targets mergers where companies purchase suppliers, and occasionally competitor 's suppliers, in order to secure production. It added vertical mergers and conglomerate mergers to the possible list of antitrust violations. REGULATORY COMMISSIONS OF INDUSTRIAL…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14. The Sherman Anti-trust Act was passed by Congress so that it would avoid a monopoly that would destroy the market.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust Laws Effective

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States has several laws that are intended to further fair, balanced, and competitive business practices. These laws are typically effective as control measures to ensure fair business practices are followed. Determining the success or failure of specific legislation or regulations can be relative to what angle you are looking from. With these anti-trust laws we are insured safeness from unreasonable trade, price discrimination, and unfair and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays