The legal concept of bail refers to the conditional freedom of a person charged with a criminal offence. The purposes of bail are to protect society from potentially violent and dangerous offenders and to minimise the amount of inmates held on remand.
The decision to grant bail is made by a magistrate in a formal bail hearing held in the local court. Under certain circumstances police can grant bail. Bail is a crucial part of the criminal investigation process and any person charged with a criminal offence has the right to apply for bail. A magistrate hears a bail application in the local court and determines whether the person is a danger to society or not. If the magistrate believes there may be risks associated with granting a certain person bail they may impose conditions to mitigate these risks. Some common Bail conditions include the suspension of passports, routine police check ups, payment of surety’s and electronic monitoring.
The issue of bail is highly debated and has thus attracted the attention of legal experts resulting in several commissions and reforms. To be effective the Criminal Justice System must balance the rights of offenders with the States responsibility to protect society and prosecute criminals. The Bail Act 1978 (NSW) created a system of presumption for or against bail based on the nature of the criminal charges. This presumption based system had its weakness’s which included the increase in presumption on bail leading to increasing number on remand, a high number of vulnerable groups such as young offenders, indigenous offenders and re-offenders were frequently found in remand. Controversy arose with 30% of people on remand receiving a guilty verdict and 10% of those receiving a jail sentence.
Critics of this act called for a review of the Bail Act 1978. The NSW Law Reform Commission conducted a detailed and lengthy review assisted by many legal experts and thus made recommendations to the NSW government based on their findings. The recommendations were adopted and praised and the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) came into play. The key reforms in this Act were the abolishment of the presumption based system and the adoption of a more case by case evidence based system which was highly applauded around the world.
However, recent high profile cases such as the Steven Fesus case challenged the effectiveness of these reforms. As a result the NSW Attorney General Brad Hazzard called for a review of the new bail laws. Mr Hazzard stated that the review was aimed at ensuring “the safety of the community, victims and witnesses is at the forefront of all decisions made on bail.” These concerns were promoted by high profile media “shock jocks” such as Sydney Morning Herald reporter Rachel Olding who stated that the new bail laws were “making it easier for accused criminals to be bailed..”.
In late 2014 further reforms regarding bail were announced. The Bail Amendment Act 2014 (NSW) introduced a new requirement for those applying for bail to “show cause” why their detention on remand is unjustified. This reform shifted the burden to the accused to demonstrate they would not fail the criteria in the risk assessment. This meant that people who could not represent themselves or could not afford representation found themselves at a disadvantage and the amount of vulnerable persons on remand began to rise again.
On one hand this reform was applauded because it was a “recalibration of unacceptable risk. Where the consequences of the risk are significant, they (offenders) are given a great weight” as said by Mr Hazzard. But on the other hand, several criticisms were raised regarding the new laws. Former Director of Public Prosecutions Nicholas Cowdery stated that “laws cannot cater for ever situation” and that one “atypical and aberrant case is certainly not a good basis for launching into yet more interference with the Bail Act”.
Bail continues to be an essential yet highly complex part of the criminal investigation process. This issue highlights the difficult challenge facing the criminal justice system of balancing the rights and needs of victims, offenders and society. Bail is a very complex issue and is different for every cases as Nicholas Cowdery said “laws cannot cater for every situation, that is why courts exercise judgement.
Zac Peacock
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The term Bailment is derived from the French Bailor, "to deliver". A bailment is a temporary transfer of property to another for a limited time and for a specific purpose. The transfer of property in a bailment is only in regards to possession, not ownership. The bailor is the owner of the transferred property. The bailee holds the transferred property. The property is held in trust for the benefit of the bailor. A bailment is completely different from a bail bond.…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Mark is now able to the post bail and be release until his next court day. Bail is money or some form of property that is deposited pr pledged to a court, in order to secure the release from custody or jail of a suspect who has been arrested. With the understand that the suspect will return for their trail and require court appearance. However, in the State of Georgia any…
- 71 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Australian legal system doesn't deliver justice equally for all Australians. In this essay, the issues of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values, access to the legal system and issues of fairness in the law will be discussed. There are several relevant examples that have influenced the viewpoint of this essay. The case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, the case of Amy vs Adam (www.lawcouncil.asn.au) and the case of Brendan Dassey.…
- 862 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Recently parole walker, Dimitrious Gargasoulas brutally ended the lives of six people during his infamous Bourke Street rampage. This tragedy has sparked widespread debate on Victoria’s bail system and the individuals who implement these laws. This is because, the sense of safety on the streets of Melbourne has been “ripped” apart due to this “horrific” incidence, causing Melbournians to feel “failed” by the judiciary system. Senator of Victoria and founder of the Justice Party, Derryn Hinch’s editorial ‘Bourke Street massacre: Victoria’s justice system fails again’ (Herald Sun 24/1/2017) plays on the fears of Melbournians to argue that the “power” should be “give[n] to the experts”, the police. Adopting a pessimistic yet passionate tone, the author seeks to evoke frustration and disappointment, instilling a need for change in the minds of Melbournians.…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
4. Bond: the release from jail custody in exchange for collateral or recognizance whereby the defendant promises to appear for future court dates.…
- 1949 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Once in jail, some criminals can get temporary freedom through bail bonds. Bail bonds are basically contractual undertakings between the person posting bail and the bail bond broker. With the bail bond, it is the responsibility of the bail bond broker to promise the appearing of the defendant in court when summoned.…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Narrowing the judges’ focus to only punishment and retribution would not serve the initial purpose of having a justice system at all. Certain members of the public may believe the opposite. These individuals believe that judges in our court system are too lenient on sentencing the accused. However, how knowledgeable are these individuals in the Australian justice system? In contrast to the expertise judges and Australian judicial workers have learnt through years of experience, must the public’s contradicting, non-expertise opinion determine the outcome of individuals accused of crime? Certainly, the law must take into account the values and expectations of the community. However, it is fundamental to our system of justice that there is the right of an offender to a fair trial must exist – this is protected in our current sentencing system. Under Section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), a court should consider a number of objectives to determine the appropriate sentence; punishment, deterrence, denouncement, rehabilitation and protection. Sentencing legislation also specifies matters that courts must take into account when passing sentence, such as mitigating factors and the offender’s personal circumstances.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Prison Service encompasses three central aims; holding prisoners securely, decrease risk of offending and lastly offer safe, well-ordered institutions in which prisoners are treated humanely, decently and lawfully (Cavadino and Dignan, 2007, p.193). When the state incarcerates, it must accept accountability for the basic care of those it detains. Although prisoners should not expect luxuries during their time of incarceration, they should not be deprived of the basic goods and comforts of life. Certification of access to enough goods should be available to help them develop as the citizens expected to be. Lord Justice Woolf (1991) claimed three necessities for the prison system to maintain steadiness: security, control and justice. In terms…
- 247 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The codification of the Criminal Code has marked a watershed on Australian legal jurisprudence. In this essay I will discuss the problems that may occur when interpreting the Criminal Code (The Code), the creation of uniformity and the also accessibility that the Code creates.…
- 788 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Statistics suggest that, with one in 5 adults, and 27 per cent of young Australians, suffering some form of mental illness, current mental health funding is unable to cater for all mental health needs, forcing prisons to become the new mental health institutions.”…
- 3560 Words
- 15 Pages
Best Essays -
Defendants who are not released on bail are being denied the opportunity to prepare their defense. Also, denying bail or having excessive bail imprisons the defendant without being properly convicted. There are cases, however, where bail must be denied or set excessively high. If an unconvicted defendant is feared to be a danger to the…
- 770 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The NSW criminal justice system relates to all areas associated with the law and law enforcement, including those who are incarcerated, on probation, or suspected of committing a criminal offence. In evaluating the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in NSW there are three issues which can be considered; alternatives to gaol, charge negotiation and the role of the courts. These issues promote or demote the effectiveness of the NSW criminal justice system, especially when evaluated in terms of equality, accessibility, resource efficiency, and the balance of rights for victims, offenders and society. These issues are also discussed widely in the media, which presents…
- 844 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
151). The passing of the Bail reform Act of 1966 assumed that all individuals, regardless of their economic status, must not be detained without reason while waiting to answer their accused charges. The more recent passing of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 primarily affected the discretion of judges, providing them with more initiative in releasing and setting bail for defendants. Also under this act, judges are obligated to hold one or more meetings evaluating the threat posed by the accused person, providing a more thorough analysis of the…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay I will be looking at the key developments of the British penal system since the early nineteenth century. I will also discuss how the main objectives of the prison system have changed over this period of time.…
- 1244 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
* The purpose of bail is to assure those arrested return for their required appearances in court; the adversial system assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty…
- 1239 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays