Preview

Bales Interaction Process Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bales Interaction Process Analysis
PIP_S1.qxd

16/12/04

4:44 PM

Page 1

Research methods:
Psychological enquiry
G

Experimental method

Dependent, independent, and confounding variables
Choosing participants and settings
Cause and effect, replication
Laboratory vs. field experiments

Quasi-experiments

Williams’ study of Canadian children
Adams and Adams’ Mount St Helens study Correlational studies

Twin studies and the nature/nurture question Issues of causality and ethics

Naturalistic observation

Brown et al.’s study of child language development Bales’ interaction process analysis

Case studies

Allport’s and Skinner’s arguments
Freud’s case study of Dr Schreber

Interviews

Coolican’s types of interview
Piaget’s clinical
…show more content…
One reason is to test a current theory. For example,
Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) argued that information only enters the long-term memory store via the short-term memory store (see PIP, Chapter 9). As a result, a brain-damaged individual with impaired short-term memory should also have impaired long-term memory. Evidence that seemed to be inconsistent with this theory was reported in a case study on KF, who was involved in a motorcycle accident (Shallice & Warrington, 1970). He had very poor short-term memory for words and digits, but his long-term learning and recall were unaffected.
Case studies can also be used to refine theories. Baddeley and Hitch (1974) argued that people possess an articulatory loop which is used in the rehearsal of verbal information (see PIP, Chapter 9). It used to be assumed that rehearsal within the articulatory loop requires use of the speech muscles. However, Baddeley and Wilson (1985) carried out a case study on a student, GB. He suffered from anarthria, which meant that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful