Preview

Ban on sugary drinks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ban on sugary drinks
Utilitarianism theory states that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of large number of people (pg 59, Moral Issues in Business).

A utilitarian would say that health is major concern for the majority. Various health issues are caused by direct or indirect effect of drinking large sugary drinks including obesity. More then half of the US population suffer from obesity and one of the factors that contributes to it is drinking large sugary drinks. Good health would produce greatest possible balance of good over bad for everyone. A Utilitarian would argue saying wouldn’t good health makes people happier. Good health also means less health cost and government spending less money into something that can be easily controlled and spending money on something that is much more needed like free college education. A utilitarian would support government ban on large sugary drinks arguing on the fact that ban on large sugary drinks would cause less health problems which in turn would make everyone happy.

Libertarianism is a philosophy of personal liberty- the liberty of each person to live according to his own choices free from the interference of other (pg 113, Moral Issues in Business).

Libertarians would oppose the to the ban of large sugary drinks. They would argue that if should be personal choice if people want to drink large drinks or small drinks. Libertarians believe in living life on our own please. They would argue about government interference on people making their choice since it would go against their value.

Rawls conceives society as a cooperative venture among its members and elaborates a conception of justice that is thoroughly social (pg 119, Moral Issues in Business).

Rawls would not agree on soda ban in NYC since Rawls believe in each person to have equal right. They would probably argue against of mayor Bloomberg plan on banning large sugary drinks. Rawls would claim that each person have equal right and equal liberty to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Racquetball Drills

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How to hit a Kill Shot: You want to get good position in the middle of the court and try hitting with power some balls very close to the floor. The reason for this is that you want the ball to bounce so your opponent has to react to a low, bouncing ball. This is an effective shot that can put you in an offensive position on your opponent.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Soda’s a Problem but…” Karin Klein distinguishes the government’s issue, “But the mayor’s initiative goes further than something like a soda tax... Bloomberg is playing nanny in the worst sort of way…”(Karin Klein, 289). Simply put, the author explains how the government is overseeing people’s lives and the choices they can make. The government is making decisions by themselves, without the people’s consent! Basically, the limitations on sugary drinks is unacceptable and should be…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore taking away the right to choose. Also in paragraph 2 of “Ban the Ban!” it says “ If despite all of those efforts, someone chooses to have a sugary drink anyway, that is their choice. If they know the facts and they do it anyway, that is a personal choice. It is not the place of our elected officials to intervene.”…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government regulation of people's dieting is wrong, they are collectivism. This is not right, everyone is not the same. It absurd to make people stop drinking what they want and what they want to eat. They are trying to become a dystopia state, the government is trying to control everything that a person is doing. Is not their chose to tell people to lose weight. I'm guessing they know what they are doing. Banning sodas and putting how many calories the food has is not really going to change their option. The government is making it seem like everyone need to lose weight. Who do they think they are, by telling and banning candy machines and soda from people. Plus, if you break that rule, they will have to pay $200. They are exaggerating with the power they have.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Rawls’ A Theory on Justice establishes standards by which we may evaluate justice in society. In assessing the United States in light of the Rawlsian principles of social justice, it is evident that America falls short of these standards, and yet this discord tolerated in America. While this incongruity does in fact affect the lives of many Americans, particularly the underpriviledged, in practice very little is done to lessen inequality so as to achieve the Rawlsian ideal of social justice in America.…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preparing Your Argument

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -Putting the soda ban into effect can reduce obesity rates, the amount of sugar being consumed by drinking soda is not good for anyone's health.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarian Party

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The party platform for the Libertarians is to strive for a world of liberty. The quote “As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others,” explains the Libertarians’ main goal. It expresses everyone’s personal freedom in their own affairs as well as economic affairs. They want to avoid foreign affairs. Which is somewhat the complete opposite of what the Republicans nor the Democrats plan on doing.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Libertarianism is the belief that humans are free to make moral choices and therefore morally responsible. “By liberty we can only mean a power of acting of not acting according to the determinations of the will”. David Hume. In the definition of libertarianism a distinction between the…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Suppose you’re in a conversation and the person you are with claims to know that God exists (or that God does not exist—it’s up to you). What does such a knowledge claim amount to? In other words, what sorts of conditions have to be satisfied for such a knowledge claim to be legitimate? Do you think such a person could meet those conditions? Why? Be sure to discuss not only the classical model of knowledge, but also the challenges posed to it by basic beliefs and Gettier counterexamples. (Be sure to give a Gettier-type example and explain its relevance to the knowledge issue.)…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Junk Food

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The introduction of prohibition in the United States meant people could not manufacture or consume alcohol. Alcohol was banned by the government for obvious reasons, alcohol harms the body. Use of drugs without prescription is illegal and harms one’s health. Junk foods and soda pop are harmful as well. Yet we have never had prohibition on these food and soda items even though these food items affect public health. According to Yale University professor of psychology and public health, Kelly Brownell, “As a culture, we’ve become upset by the tobacco companies advertising to children, but we sit idly by while the food companies do the very same thing. And we could make a claim that the toll taken on the public health by a poor diet rivals that taken by tobacco”.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gomez, Vivian. "John Rawls Theory of Social Justice." EHow. Demand Media, 04 Nov. 2010. Web. 20 Apr. 2013. <http://www.ehow.com/facts_7446222_john-rawls-theory-social-justice.html>.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays