Battle Of Chavez Valley Essay
It is a fact that the modern ideological wars are not fought in the fashion of World war II with modern arms but across the cities and they can linger for a decade as proved by the battle of Chavez ravine. Located near California Highway, Chavez ravine was the home for many Mexican-Americans and some Chinese who worked in Los Angeles City. This ideological battle raged for a complete decade that is, from 1951 to 1961 (Hines, 1982).
The first stage in this battle was the land acquirement by the government to build a viable public housing in the area after the establishment of the Public Housing Act in 1949. As the growth rate of Los Angeles was fast, the area of Chavez ravine was ideal for this project in the area. However, as the Mayor was conservative, he …show more content…
It is a fact that the base of both of these theories is somewhat contradictory however in this instance they complement each other. Although the theory of political economy explains how the original residents lost their battle due to the collaboration of the wealth, power, and law, it is unable to explain the side-effects of the transformation of a rural landscape into the urban landscape and its effects on the ecology of the area.
Similarly, this phenomenon is explained by the urban ecology. But it is unable to explain the process of the decade-long fight of the residents. Thus, both theories complement each other to explain the battle of Chavez valley.
The battle of Chavez valley was a clear demonstration of how two different and somewhat contradictory theories can complement each other to explain a decade-long fight that was lost by the rightful owners. It also explains how a collaboration between the trade, production and their connection with the law, government, custom and distribution of the national wealth and income destroyed an ideology it was supposed to
The first stage in this battle was the land acquirement by the government to build a viable public housing in the area after the establishment of the Public Housing Act in 1949. As the growth rate of Los Angeles was fast, the area of Chavez ravine was ideal for this project in the area. However, as the Mayor was conservative, he …show more content…
It is a fact that the base of both of these theories is somewhat contradictory however in this instance they complement each other. Although the theory of political economy explains how the original residents lost their battle due to the collaboration of the wealth, power, and law, it is unable to explain the side-effects of the transformation of a rural landscape into the urban landscape and its effects on the ecology of the area.
Similarly, this phenomenon is explained by the urban ecology. But it is unable to explain the process of the decade-long fight of the residents. Thus, both theories complement each other to explain the battle of Chavez valley.
The battle of Chavez valley was a clear demonstration of how two different and somewhat contradictory theories can complement each other to explain a decade-long fight that was lost by the rightful owners. It also explains how a collaboration between the trade, production and their connection with the law, government, custom and distribution of the national wealth and income destroyed an ideology it was supposed to