Preview

Behavioural Finance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Behavioural Finance
Behavioural Finance
Martin Sewell
University of Cambridge

February 2007 (revised April 2010)
Abstract An introduction to behavioural finance, including a review of the major works and a summary of important heuristics.

1

Introduction

Behavioural finance is the study of the influence of psychology on the behaviour of financial practitioners and the subsequent effect on markets. Behavioural finance is of interest because it helps explain why and how markets might be inefficient. For more information on behavioural finance, see Sewell (2001).

2

History

Back in 1896, Gustave le Bon wrote The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, one of the greatest and most influential books of social psychology ever written (le Bon 1896). Selden (1912) wrote Psychology of the Stock Market. He based the book ‘upon the belief that the movements of prices on the exchanges are dependent to a very considerable degree on the mental attitude of the investing and trading public’. In 1956 the US psychologist Leon Festinger introduced a new concept in social psychology: the theory of cognitive dissonance (Festinger, Riecken and Schachter 1956). When two simultaneously held cognitions are inconsistent, this will produce a state of cognitive dissonance. Because the experience of dissonance is unpleasant, the person will strive to reduce it by changing their beliefs. Pratt (1964) considers utility functions, risk aversion and also risks considered as a proportion of total assets. Tversky and Kahneman (1973) introduced the availability heuristic: ‘a judgmental heuristic in which a person evaluates the frequency of classes or the probability of events by availability, i.e. by the ease with which relevant instances come to mind.’ The reliance on the availability heuristic leads to systematic biases. 1

In 1974, two brilliant psychologists, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, described three heuristics that are employed when making judgments under uncertainty (Tversky and Kahneman 1974):



References: BANERJEE, Abhijit V., 1992. A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. BARBER, Brad M., and Terrance ODEAN, 2001. Boys Will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. BARBERIS, Nicholas, and Ming HUANG, 2001. Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1247– 1292. BARBERIS, Nicholas, Ming HUANG, and Tano SANTOS, 2001. Prospect Theory and Asset Prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1– 53. BARBERIS, Nicholas, Andrei SHLEIFER, and Robert VISHNY, 1998. A Model of Investor Sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343. BARBERIS, Nicholas C., and Richard H. THALER, 2003. A Survey of Behavioral Finance. In: George M. CONSTANTINIDES, Milton HARRIS, and Ren´ M. STULZ, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance: Volume 1B, e Financial Markets and Asset Pricing. Elsevier North Holland, Chapter 18, pp. 1053–1128. BASU, Sudipta, 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. BENARTZI, Shlomo, and Richard H. THALER, 1995. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92. BERNOULLI, Daniel, 1738. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 5, 175–192. BERNOULLI, Daniel, 1954. Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36. English translation of Bernoulli (1738) by Louise Sommer. BIKHCHANDANI, Sushil, David HIRSHLEIFER, and Ivo WELCH, 1998. Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170. BIRNBAUM, Michael H., 2008. New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making. Psychological Review, 115(2), 463–501. CAMERER, Colin, and Dan LOVALLO, 1999. Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306–318. 9 CHAN, Louis K. C., Narasimhan JEGADEESH, and Josef LAKONISHOK, 1996. Momentum Strategies. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681–1713. DANIEL, Kent, David HIRSHLEIFER, and Avanidhar SUBRAHMANYAM, 1998. Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839–1885. De Bondt, Werner F. M., and Richard THALER, 1985. Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805. De Bondt, Werner F. M., and Richard H. THALER, 1987. Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 557–581. FAMA, Eugene F., 1998. Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283–306. FERNANDEZ, Raquel, and Dani RODRIK, 1991. Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1146–1155. FESTINGER, Leon, Henry W. RIECKEN, and Stanley SCHACHTER, 1956. When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. FINUCANE, Melissa L., et al., 2000. The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. GHASHGHAIE, S., et al., 1996. Turbulent Cascades in Foreign Exchange Markets. Nature, 381(6585), 767–770. GIGERENZER, Gerd, and Reinhard SELTEN, eds., 2001. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Dahlem Workshop Reports. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. GIGERENZER, Gerd, Peter M. TODD, and the ABC Research Group, 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press. GILOVICH, Thomas, 1991. How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press. GILOVICH, Thomas, and Dale GRIFFIN, 2002. Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now. In: Thomas GILOVICH, Dale GRIFFIN, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–18. GILOVICH, Thomas, Dale GRIFFIN, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, eds., 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. GRINBLATT, Mark, and Matti KELOHARJU, 2001. What Makes Investors Trade? The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 589–616. 10 GRINBLATT, Mark, Sheridan TITMAN, and Russ WERMERS, 1995. Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior. The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1088–1105. ¨ HARRISON, Glenn W., and E. Elisabet RUTSTROM, 2009. Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory: One Wedding and a Decent Funeral. Experimental Economics, 12(2), 133–158. HOLT, Charles A., and Susan K. LAURY, 2002. Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. HONG, Harrison, Terence LIM, and Jeremy C. STEIN, 2000. Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage, and the Profitability of Momentum Strategies. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 265–295. HONG, Harrison, and Jeremy C. STEIN, 1999. A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2143–2184. HUBERMAN, Gur, 2001. Familiarity Breeds Investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659–680. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, Jack L. KNETSCH, and Richard H. THALER, 1990. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, Jack L. KNETSCH, and Richard H. THALER, 1991. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, Paul SLOVIC, and Amos TVERSKY, eds., 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos TVERSKY, 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos TVERSKY, 1996. On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582–591. KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos TVERSKY, 2000. Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Choices, Values, and LAKONISHOK, Josef, Andrei SHLEIFER, and Robert W. VISHNY, 1994. Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541–1578. le Bon, Gustave, 1896. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. London: T. Fisher Unwin. 11 LEE, Charles M. C., and Bhaskaran SWAMINATHAN, 2000. Price Momentum and Trading Volume. The Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2017–2069. NOFSINGER, John R., and Richard W. SIAS, 1999. Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2263–2295. ODEAN, Terrance, 1998. Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798. ODEAN, Terrance, 1999. Do Investors Trade Too Much? The American Economic Review, 89(5), 1279–1298. PLOUS, Scott, 1993. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill. POTERBA, James M., and Lawrence H. SUMMERS, 1988. Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(1), 27–59. PRATT, John W., 1964. Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136. RABIN, Matthew, 2000. Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281–1292. RABIN, Matthew, and Richard H. THALER, 2001. Anomalies: Risk Aversion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219–232. SAMUELSON, William, and Richard ZECKHAUSER, 1988. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. SELDEN, G. C., 1912. Psychology of the Stock Market: Human Impulses Lead To Speculative Disasters. New York: Ticker Publishing. SEWELL, Martin, 2001. behaviouralfinance.net/. Behavioural finance. http://www. SHEFRIN, Hersh, 2000. Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Financial Management Association Survey and Synthesis Series. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. SHILLER, Robert J., 1981. Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends? The American Economic Review, 71(3), 421–436. SHILLER, Robert J., 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. SHLEIFER, Andrei, 2000. Inefficient Markets: A Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 12 SLOVIC, Paul, et al., 2002. The affect heuristic. In: Thomas GILOVICH, Dale GRIFFIN, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420. STARMER, Chris, 2000. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 332–382. THALER, Richard, 1980. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. THALER, Richard, 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. THALER, Richard H., 1992. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. THALER, Richard H., 1999. Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1973. Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1974. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251–S278. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1991. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel KAHNEMAN, 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. VERONESI, Pietro, 1999. Stock Market Overreaction to Bad News in Good Times: A Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 975–1007. von NEUMANN, John, and Oskar MORGENSTERN, 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. WERMERS, Russ, 1999. Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 581–622. YAARI, Menahem E., 1987. The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica, 55(1), 95–115. 13

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This document of BUS 405 Week 2 Chapter 8 Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing includes:…

    • 713 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    behavioral finance

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First of all , I’d like to define the Random walk hypothesis , since it’s consistent with the Efficient Market Hypothesis :…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss how behavioral finance concepts, such as bias, may impact investor decisions and the efficiency of financial markets.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One will think that when a stock is considered a winner the investor will be willing to hold this stock and try to get rid of the loser stocks. In contrast, studies have indicated that there is an anomaly affecting the investor’s behavior on stock trading. In Hersh Shefrin and Mein Statman’s report (1985) this anomaly is referred as a disposition effect and it is related to investors’ tendency on selling assets whose price has substantially increased too quickly but also holding losers too long. In other words, investors have a propensity to recognize gains while in the same time are less willing to recognize losses. Due to this fact, several papers have been published to illustrate the outcome the disposition effect has on several aspects of stock trading. Taking this in consideration, this paper focuses on the features of this effect in the extend of the angles these economists have presented their empirical evidence.…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus it can be deduced that changes in economic fundamentals does not fully explain the movement of stock prices. This is because stock prices vary too greatly. Instead the other part that causes changes in stock prices is due to human emotions. I shall present to you below a write-up on how human emotions or ‘animal spirit’ affects our decisions on investment.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making (1st ed.). New York:…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iihara, Y., Kato, H.K., & Tokunaga, T. (2001). Investors ' Herding on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. International Review of Finance, 2, 71-98. Institute for Supply Management. (n.d.). About ISM. Retrieved April 6, 2006 from http://www.ism.ws/ Kacapyr, E. (1996). Economic Forecasting: The State of the Art. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Malkiel B.G. (2003). The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 59-82. Mankiw, G. & Scarth, W. (2004). Macroeconomics: Canadian Edition (2nd ed.). United States: Worth Publishers. Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc. (2005). Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Retrived April 6, 2006, from http://www.msci.com/equity/gics.html National Institute of Standards and Technology. (n.d.). Engineering Statistics Handbook. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ O 'Reilly, R.C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute for Technology. Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.). United States: Pearson Education. Siegel, J. (1998). Stocks for the Long Run. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. University of Michigan. (2006). Survey of Consumers. Retrieved on April 6, 2006 from http://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/ Wärneryd, K.E. (2001). Stock-Market Psychology. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar. Weisstein, E.W. (1999). Mathworld. Retrieved April 6, 2006 from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ Yao, J., Teng, N., Poh, H., & Tan, C.L. (1998). Forecasting and Analysis of Marketing Data Using Neural Networks. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 14, 843-862. Zell, A., Mamier, G., Vogt, M., Mache, B., Hübner, R., & Döring, S. (n.d.). Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator: User Manual, Version 4.2. Retrieved April 6, 2006, from http://wwwra.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/downloads/SNNS/SNNSv4.2.Manual.pdf…

    • 14314 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay also discusses about two main topics; limits to arbitrage and psychology. These two topics are known as the two buildings blocks of the behaviour finance.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Kahneman, D. And Tversky, A. (1974) Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, Vol.185, No. 4157, p1124-1131.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The interrelationship between international stock markets is a key issue in international portfolio management and risk measurement. The efficient markets hypothesis has been one of the most widely criticized theories in the financial literature in recent years on the basis that investors may exhibit irrational and predictable biases mainly attributed to psychological factors. Trading and active portfolio management involve sophisticated brain functions such as logical reasoning, numerical computation, and short- and long-term planning which may often be tempered by emotional responses such as fear. Investors’ preference for the avoidance of loss may imply that significant fluctuations in prices are not necessarily related to the arrival of information on economic or financial variables but may also correspond to collective phenomena such as crowd effects or herd behavior. Behavioral finance…

    • 2012 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jarrow, R A (1992): “Market manipulation, bubbles, corners, and short squeezes”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, no 3, 311-36. Kihlstrom, R (2001): “Monopoly power in dynamic securities markets”, Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Kodres, L E and M Pritsker (2002): “A rational expectations model of financial contagion”, Journal of Finance, 57, 769-99. Kyle, A S (1985): “Continuous auctions and insider trading”, Econometrica, 53, 1315-35. ——— (1989): “Informed speculation with imperfect competition”, Review of Economic Studies, 56, 317-56. Kyle, A S and W Xiong (2001): “Contagion as a wealth effect”, Journal of Finance, 56, 1401-40. Lindenberg, E B (1979): “Capital market equilibrium with price affecting institutional investors”, in Portfolio theory 25 years after: essays in honor of Harry Markowitz, Elton, E J and M J Gruber, eds, North Holland, pp 109-24. Mamaysky, H and M Spiegel (2002): “A theory of mutual funds: optimal fund objectives and industry organization”, Working Paper, Yale School of Management. Nanda, V and R Singh (1998): “Mutual fund structures and the pricing of liquidity”, Working Paper, University of Michigan Business School. Pastor, L and R F Stambaugh (2001): “Liquidity risk and expected stock returns”, Working Paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Pritsker, M (2002): Large investors, implications for equilibrium asset returns, shock absorption, and liquidity, mimeo, Federal Reserve Board. Routledge, B R and S E Zin (2001): Model uncertainty and liquidity, mimeo, July.…

    • 9585 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shefrin and Statman show that fearing, regret and seeking pride causes investors to be predisposed to selling winners too early and riding losers too long. They call this the disposition effect. T. Odean used four components to describe disposition effect.…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study of Finance

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The philosophy— Investing behavior should be driven by information, analysis, and self-discipline, not be emotion or “hunch”.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    crim paper

    • 2011 Words
    • 22 Pages

    My risk tolerance was a 8 I was planning on winning the stocktrak game. I c…

    • 2011 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heuristic

    • 4016 Words
    • 17 Pages

    References: Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Paul Slovic, eds. (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics & Biases. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-28414-7…

    • 4016 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics