Preview

Believe Me, It’s Torture” by Christopher Hitchens

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Believe Me, It’s Torture” by Christopher Hitchens
Rick F

Believe Me, It’s Torture” by Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens tells a story of volunteering go through some of the training SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) that some of the members of the Special Forces have gone through. The author explores what real waterboarding was like in a controlled environment where he could stop it at any time.
The author recounts every aspect of his waterboarding experience from the physical aspect of having his hands cuffed to his belt a black hood placed over his face and then being carried into a room and strapped down onto a sloping board. Then have the mental and emotional aspect of fear of the unknown and the bright lights, loud music and then the panic as the water pours over his face, and the feeling of being drowned slowly.
Some of the arguments against waterboarding from Mr. Malcolm Nance who has been involved with the SERE program since 1997 are:
1. “Water boarding is a deliberate torture technique and has been prosecuted as such by our judicial arm when perpetrated by others”.
2. “If we allow it and justify it, we cannot complain if it is employed in the future by other regimes on captive U.S. citizens. It is a method of putting American prisoners in harm’s way”.
3. “It may be a means of extracting information, but it’s also a means of extracting junk information”.
4. “It opens a door that cannot be closed. Once u have posed the notorious “ticking bomb” question, and once you assume” that you are in the right, what will you not do? Waterboarding not getting results fast enough the terrorist clock still ticking? Well, then, bring on the thumbscrews and the pincers and the electrodes and the rack.

The conclusion from the author is any call to indict the United States for torture is therefore a lame diseased attempt to arrive at a moral equivalence between those who defend civilization and those who exploit its freedoms to hollow

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Jonathan Alter has written essay titled:”time to think about torture.” Mr. alter refers to the time. It in the United States history as the: “autumn to of anger.” He describes multiple torture methods and gives examples in detail their uses. He refers to the time: Prior to September 11th, “hopelessly September 10th.” Mr. Altar explains that that era of time had many wrong assumptions about law and its enforcement in reference to terrorism. By a vote of 98 to 1 PM The Anti- terrorism bill was passed and history was made. Chief Justice Robert Jackson stated:”the Constitution is not a suicide pact. “This comment by the Chief…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opinion piece, A sorry state? Written on 2nd of august 2007, Professor Janice Stevens opposes in an alarmed and critical tone that the treatment of David Hicks in Guantanamo Bay is a violation of human rights and that Australia’s response only shows that other citizens should be scared of themselves being held in such a state. In a sophisticated style the article addresses at an educated adult audience, or to those who are concerned about the treatment of their fellow citizens.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine drowning above water it's like when someone is putting a towel over your face and splashing you with water. Detainees also known as suspicious suspects have been tortured using Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. EIT is a good way for the CIA to get intelligence from terrorists before they attack. Also, it's better to suspect one person instead of letting many people die. People should be able to get answers out of the terrorists before there is another attack. EIT was originally made post 9-11 because there were detainees still out there that had answers on how and why 9-11 occurred.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When times that require the use of torture come to light, the media tends to give life to an already harsh experience. If a soldier needs to find out where his fellow soldiers were taken, there are ways to get this information out of the detainee. To some, the quickest way to do so is to bring the harshest aspects the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture to exist in the United States of America. Levin would love to see society change its negative views on torture so that, under certain circumstances, torture would be permissible. The article starts off with a very brief description of how he believes society views the subject of torture as a negative thing. He leads on to oppose that way of thinking and provides three cases in which he believes torture must be administered with various reasons attempting to support his thoughts. The hypothetical cases Levin uses range from very extreme situations, to a situation where we may sometimes see on the news. Levin makes it clear to the audience that he does not agree with torture as a punishment and focuses on exactly what it should be used for. He also stresses that there is an important difference between terrorists and victims and he believes it would stop the talk of “terrorist rights”. Levin also writes on his belief that most terrorist do their crimes for publicity and because of that, the terrorist shall be fairly easy to identify and later be tortured. He closes the article by saying torture would cause little danger to western democracies and predicting what he believes will happen in the future.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism assumes that it would be morally correct for me to employ the water boarding technique on this possibly innocent man if it meant obtaining possible anti-terrorist information that could possibly save thousands of innocent Americans. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’, so they say, but is torture really the best way to obtain the best consequence? I will use my take on the Just War model and J.J.C Smarts’ suggestion to focus on all consequences of a situation to argue against the notion that water torture would be morally ethical and the right thing that I ought to do.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asserts that any means should be utilized on a terrorist, who is caught during an extreme situation, such as a bomb threat, since there is a limitation on time and information is needed to protect as many civilians as possible. Krauthammer refers to this as a “ticking time bomb” exception. This is further followed by the “slower-fuse high-value terrorist” circumstance in which an influential terrorist should be tortured as well because her/his information can be utilized to plan for future attacks and tactically protect the lives of numerous people. To support this exception, Krauthammer refers to the detainment and water boarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a member of al Qaeda, by American operatives in order to extract information about plans and cell locations. Clearly, this intelligence would not be obtained by abiding to McCain’s…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Shue begins his article discussing torture with constraints which allows the victim to “surrender” and comply with the demands of the torturer. According to the Constraint of Possible Compliance (CPC), “the victim of torture must have available an act of compliance which, if performed, will end the torture” (Shue 427). With the aim of interrogational torture being to extract information from a person with holding it, this torture appears to satisfy the constraint of possible compliance, since it offers an escape, in the form of providing the information wanted by the torturers, which affords some protection against further assault. In practice there are evidently only a few pure cases of interrogational torture. For the most dominant type of torture that occurs today is considered to be terroristic. Terroristic torture is meant to put fear in not only the victim, but also all those who oppose that government. The victim’s suffering is being used as a means to end over which the victim has no control over.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advocates of torture argue that torture is a necessary tool especially in time sensitive scenarios, like if an individual is the only person alive who knows the whereabouts of a bomb that is set to detonate, resulting in the deaths of hundreds. I could not even imagine how stressful the interview process of this scenario would be, as time progresses and no results are being produced, inflicting pain does not only have the possibility of yielding results but it would also be a convenient way to externalize your frustrations.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are put under a time crunch that affects how we deal with situations. Michael Levin wrote in his essay “The Case for Torture” that we should use torture because it is better to torture one person who is obviously guilty. This would help insure that thousands of lives could be saved at the expense of just one or a few people. In a brief statement about terrorist’s rights, Levin says “torture is barbaric? Mass murder is more barbaric” (532). In this simple statement, Levin argues that torturing is the lesser of two evils. And it is true. Would we rather sacrifice many lives for one that is potentially guilty? Most would say no. In fact, if we allow torture to become legal, we might get results that many have not thought of. If torture was made legal, it could potentially intimidate future terrorists into thinking twice about their plans. Still, nothing is for…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Torture Ok?

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is an ongoing debate on whether torture should be used and if it is ever “ok”. There are many different points of view and both sides have very clear, convincing arguments on whether torture should be used as a way to obtain information. One side says that torture is not necessary even in extreme cases. The other side it should be used if it mandatory. Although these sound like a compromise they do have a few conflicting ideas. Even though both essays are trying to sway the reader to one side or another, it is the reader’s choice on how he or she feels on torture.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Cited: Cohn, Marjorie. Interview with Mark Karlin. "The 'normalization ' of torture". from the square. New York University. 16 Mar, 2012. Web. 30 May 2012.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of Waterboarding

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Torture has long been used by law enforcement agencies and governments to questions criminals and terrorists. It is used to coax confessions or to find out any sort of information that may lead to the arrest or capture of other criminals. Although the torturing of prisoners in the United States is strictly prohibited by the constitution, the government started using the tactic waterboarding against terrorists. Although the government says waterboarding has led to prevention on mass terrorist attacks on U.S soil, it is not accepted by all of this country’s citizens. It is believed by certain people that waterboarding is torture and others do not believe it is. It is my goal to explore why the United States deemed this technique necessary and why people argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays