Benefits Of Bilingualism In Canada

Benefits of Official Bilingualism behind the Economic Efficiency
Disclosure about maintaining official bilingualism in Canada has been controversial issue among those interested including the government, companies, and individuals. The main approaches surrounding this issue can be summarized by economic and social reasons. To elaborate, various economic sectors, and particular certain companies, have to pay the cost when they produce their products by offering information based on bilingualism for customers. Moreover, not only companies but also the government has to pay for it. According to Fraser, around $2.4-billion has been paid for federal and provincial bilingual services (quoted in Baluja and Bradshaw). However, the cost that companies
Dramatically rising public expenditures for French-language services in the North-West during 19th century can be sufficient indexes to measure the economic burden on public area even though those cases happened a great while ago. The Department of Finance found that the portion of the cost for French-language services including documents, translation, and interpretation in comparison to total printing and clerical costs in North-West rose noticeably 5% to 13% by complying with official bilingualism (quoted in Aunger, 468). Similarly, companies also have paid for it by offering bilingual services such as bilingual labels on products and advertisements for customers. According to Gunter, private companies spent $900-million or more a year in order to conform to language regulations. Those expenses can be violence for companies suffering financial difficulties, which leads the opponents of official bilingualism to describe its statutory status by using several negative words such as “bureaucratic language monitors”, “superfluous regulations” to give reasoning power to do away with official
A decision to end of having two official languages is obviously a threat to Canadian’s original history and nationalism. The official motto of Quebec, ‘Je me souviens’, shows that upholding official bilingualism is a way to succeed Canadian’s identity since the official motto is interpreted as “We do not forget, and will never forget, our ancient lineage, traditions and memories of all the past” (quoted in Wikipedia, 3). Those interpretations imply that revoking official bilingualism might lead to social strife in terms of denying the historical roots of Canada. Furthermore, official bilingualism has been evaluated as a national asset helping both English-Canadian and French-Canadian to bond each other. To prove national supports about that contention, the responses about the Canadian Government’s action plan in 2003 to promote the use of both official languages can be relevant grounds. Leger Marketing announced that only 27% of respondents had been against the development of bilingualism throughout Canada (quoted in Moon and Hwang, 271).
Through the core evaluations indicating the importance of maintaining official linguistic duality by measuring its significant contributions to respect the minority, bilingual population, and to bond both English-Canadian and French-Canadian steadily. For those