Preview

Benefits Of The Fourth Amendment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
188 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Benefits Of The Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Binks Vs Mckay Case Study

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 12, 2016 the court case Binks/McKay vs the United States challenged the idea of the Fourth Amendment. The case explains the situation between Binks and McKay, who claimed that the FBI violated their Fourth amendment rights when the FBI searched through their Facebook messages after being suspected of being terrorists. This occured when Binks and McKay were discovered to have been communicating with a supposed ISIS member. They had claimed to have no intentions of joining the terrorist group. In this case, Sam and Melanie (petitioners) reminded us that a warrant and reason for searching is a necessity when it comes to violating one’s right to privacy. However, court justices Danny and Nick both asked similarly: “Why do you think that violates their privacy?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment is a security blanket for those who were wrongfully suspected of being guilty. The Amendment states that one is safe in their own house, with their own property until the authority can provide a warrant. So where was the 4th Amendment when the Japanese were pushed out of their homes and into internment camps? The words of a man who experienced this atrocity first hand, George Takei, only further proves that the Japanese were denied this Amendment, “[American soldiers] stomped up the front porch and banged on the door. My father answered it, and the soldiers ordered us out of our home.” Pertaining to the 4th Amendment, the soldiers should have had a warrant, or at least an explanation to give to the family before telling them…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According the Fourth Amendment, “protection applies only to situations where an individual has a subjective expectation of private that society willingly recognizes as reasonable” (Maras, 2015, p. 84). Thanks to the decision in the Katz v. United States case, the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test is used to established when law enforcement are allowed to conduct a search that does not violate one’s privacy (Maras, 2015). Information that is meant to be private and is contained in technology devices can be protected under the Fourth Amendment because the person’s intentions are to keep the information from the public (Maras, 2015). For example, in the Katz case there was a phone conversation that was admitted as evidence, but later found…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People charged with violations of the Patriot Act that involve internet users have had their Fourth Amendment rights violated by secret searches which is the government’s ability to search private property without notice to the owner and by trap and trace searches which collects addressing information about the origin and destination of communications not just the content. By the government using the secret searches they are able to find information that is not always available on the internet or outside of your computer or your home.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within the granting of access to information, persons, and resources, the Patriot Act has also enhanced the abilities and rights of law enforcement, the courts, and the government at large. Now, more than ever, law enforcement, the courts and the government can intervene in every part of your life, from observing your activities through extensive surveillance techniques to monitoring your library-reading list to ensure political loyalties are properly aligned.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment protects citizens of the United States from unlawful searches and seizures conducted by police officers or law enforcement agencies. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution affirms: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”The fourth amendment protects searches that happens when a government official contravene with one's expectation of privacy. Another thing that the fourth amendment protects are seizures’. For a seizure police would conduct communication to a reasonable person. Terry v. Ohio case first took place on…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the beginning stages of the War on Terrorism, President Bush enacted the Patriot Act. This allowed the government to spy on citizens, monitoring their activities in order to discern whether or not someone is a terrorist. It brought about changes in law enforcement that allowed agencies to search phones, financial records, etc.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I believe that the 4th amendment is both good and bad depending on the circumstances. Sometimes there are people who blatantly have drugs that the cops can't frisk off until they have the warrant. By the time the police get the warrant, said suspect could have already gotten rid of the drugs. However, this also works the other way. Sometimes, the police search other people that they have false evidence on. Then this innocent person gets searched and it makes the searched person look bad in the future.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An influential government philosopher John Locke once stated, “Government has no other end , but the preservation of property.” The 4th amendment has an important part of protecting essential values. 4th amendment allows people to be secured in persons, houses, ext.Unless an issued search warrant ,probable cause or reasonable suspicion. For instance a precedent is Katz v Ohio this shows that the government can go too far with their search and seizure procedure.Today there are many cases in which the government is not using a search warrant when they are searching someone. Another reason is the writs of assistance case which established that the government does not take into consideration the 4th amendment for years the colonies got their ships searched and they were ran over by the government until the 4th amendment became a bill of right. How they established this case is they searched a ship for smuggled goods. I think that this is too far because they shouldn't be able to…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I enjoy reading your post. I would say that one of the reasons the 4th Amendment is so important is that it is reflective of the Colonists' own experiences. The Colonists were outraged on many levels that British soldiers could enter their homes, seize their belongings, or search their property without any probable cause or authentic paperwork. The fact that warrant-less and groundless searches became so prevalent is one reason why the 4th Amendment strictly states that justification and authentication must accompany all searches and investigation of property and belongings. Another I would say that the 4th Amendment is important is that it represents a fundamental right of a person accused of wrongdoing in a legal sense. The 4th Amendment…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 5th Amendment states that the government must follow the due process of the law before punishing a person and that all citizens had the right to a trial by jury. It also states that a person cannot be put on trial twice for the same crime or that person on trial for a crime does not have to testify against themselves in court - "Pleading the 5th". The reason for this addition to the Constitution was due to the British refusing to grant the same rights to American subjects as they gave to people in Great Britain. Many people were jailed without even being accused of a crime. This specifically referred to the right of a Trial by Jury and the right not incriminate themselves. The 5th Amendment is also referred to as the Double Jeopardy and…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government official does not have the right to go on the man’s property without a warrant. In 4th Amendment, it specifically says “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue” it means that a government official can not go on your property, car or phone without probable cause.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my criminal justice classes, I learned that there are many amendments that protects citizens when they are arrested. After September 11, and the terrorist attacked, President Bush passed the Patriot Act. Many people were unhappy because it allows police officers and federal agents to invade our privacy. Many laws passed into effect and all the police departments started to share information with ICE, FBI and other federal agencies, nationwide and locally.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Hudson, 2010, p.363). In this essay we will explore what is reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment. A discussion of consensual encounters vs. detentions concerning search and seizure, we will also discus important cases that shape the fundamentals procedures of search and seizure.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays