“The Return of Martin Guerre” by Natalie Zemon Davis provides the read with an interesting case of a present, Arnaud du Tihl, stealing Martin Guerre identity and almost getting away with it. The story create two campus of thought on Bertrande’s motive. One side being defended by Davis, and arguing she masterminded the whole plan. While Robert Finlay arguing she was innocent. Davis argument is the most believable with too many questions and too many assumption, and to neatly package together that points to Bertrande being guilty of helping Amaund du Tihl stealing Guerre identity.…
I don't think that Arnaud du Tilh, Bertrand de Rols, and Martin Guerre knew each other before the trial. Arnaud and Martin may have met somewhere out on the battlefields across Europe. Arnaud went across Europe and was later told by some people that he looked like Martin so that's when he probably inquired about his life so he could "return" to his home and take over his life. He always asked questions about Martin's life and began to gain knowledge about his life and everything that happened in his life. When he had enough information to take over his life, he went to his house and proclaimed that he was Martin. When in actuality the old Martin wasn't literate and he was much nicer to Bertrand, he wanted to have much more sex with her too. They eventually produced a child together and everyone seemed to agree that they liked the new martin better. It seemed as though everything was going great until Martin wanted to collect on the profits he missed out during the 8 years he was missing. After doing so, his uncle didn't like the idea and considered him an imposter and then threatened legal action. Bertrand knew always that it was not the real Martin but she played a long anyway. I believe she did so because she likes this Martin…
The return of Martin Guerre is a story of a peasant who left his wife, Bertrande and his son. After several years, a man called Arnaud du Tilh impersonated Martin Guerre, stole his identity and lived under Martin’s name for three years until he became accused of this act. He almost convinced the court that he was Martin Guerre until the real Martin walked into the curt. Davis, the author of the book illustrates why Martin Guerre left his family and inheritance, how the imposter came into Bertrande’s life , and how economic and religion were playing a role in the sixteenth century society.…
Those who testified claimed that Pansette was not an imposter, until a man walks in claiming to be the real Martin Guerre. Martin’s family, including Bertrande, admits that this man is, in fact, the real Martin. Pansette finally confesses that he is not Martin and learned everything he knew about him through Martin himself. Although Pansette is found guilty, the court frees Bertrande from prosecution as a collaborator. This is because the court holds the real Martin Guerre to be partially responsible for not acting as a true husband. This issue is considered so serious because it is an issue of property. By pretending to be another man, Pansette is taking another man’s wife and stealing his wealth. During the 16th century, crimes against property, such as theft and arson, were punishable by execution (Wahl, “Counter Reformation”…
During the sixteenth century, the role of men and women within society were distinctly determined and demonstrated in France. When it came to marriage, men had to remain faithful to his wife, while women also had to remain faithful to her husband. It was the man’s job to take care of his family and wife by being the provider. It was the woman’s job to keep honor to the family by being loyal wives and attentive mothers. Both the husband and wife were responsible to uphold these roles because divorce was not an option through the eyes of the church. In the sixteenth century, marriages were usually arranged at a very young age for both men and women in order to gain prosperity and property. In the novel The Return of Martin Guerre, Natalie Zemon Davis uses characters such as Bertrande and Martin/Arnaud to represent gender and marriage roles that were common during the sixteenth century in rural…
The main focus of the story is on Bertrande de Rols and her place in sixteenth century society, especially as a wife. At the age of nine, Bertrande was married to Martin Guerre who was a young peasant of Basque heritage.…
For the time being, Pierre Guerre would be the administrator of the considerable properties of his late brother and the guardian of Martin’s unmarried sisters. At some point in those years Pierre Guerre made an effort to salvage the relationship between the Guerres and the Rols and to help Martin’s abandoned wife. Now a widow with daughters of his own, he married Bertrande’s widowed mother. Bertrande’s mother would have brought whatever money or goods her husband had left her in the event that she remarried; Pierre would have made promises to support Bertrande and her son Sanxi; and they would have decided how to share any newly acquired goods. The neighboring house in which the old and young landlord had lived was presumably leased for short terms – no one would have trusted the young Bertrande to maintain it under the circumstances – and Pierre took over the headship of a household of mostly females on his own…
Clarisse, a friend of Montag’s, was his first insight to becoming fulfilled with his life again. She was open about her and her family's habits even though they were against the law and he was a fireman, someone who enforced the law. But he didn’t care, his eyes had been opened by his new friend Clarisse.…
Madame Defarge takes revenge on Charles Darnay for the acts of his father and uncle. Madame Defarge¡¦s main reason for trying to have Darnay convicted is because she holds his family responsible for the death of her siblings. When talking to Jacques Three, Madame Defarge says, ¡§[M]y husband has not my reason for pursuing this family to annihilation¡¨, which proves that she does not think that they are an enemy of the republic. Instead, she has a personal reason for bringing Darnay to trial (351). Monsieur Defarge, who plays as large a role in the revolution as Madame Defarge, does not, for Lucy¡¦s sake, want to see Darnay harmed. When he says this to his wife, she replies, ¡§Her husband¡¦s destiny . . . will lead him to the end that is to end him¡¨ (186). Madame Defarge is so revengeful that she even pursues Darnay¡¦s wife and child. She personally delivers a note to Lucy so that she can see them and ¡§[t]he shadow attendant on Madame Defarge and her party seem[s] then to fall, threatening and dark, on both the mother and the child¡¨ (265). Lucy and Little Lucy are forced to flee for their lives before they are denounced.…
The father was very happy when his daughter visited him after a long time. He had nothing special for his daughter but he did thoughtfully buy some peaches as a meal to welcome her back. He gave his little girl a good-looking peach and took the flawed one for himself. In the flawed peach, there was a bug came out from the cavity. The father didn’t fear this bug; he looked at it as if it was his acquaintance and friendly named it Gaston. The image of poor Gaston seemed like the father: Gaston used to have everything in the seed of the peach; it had been a very comfortable house for him but now he had nothing as the father used to have a family, a sweet home before with his wife and daughter together but he lost it. Both of them felt pain, fear, and a solitary life when they lost everything, which meant a lot to them. Thus, the father didn’t care about how ugh Gaston was; moreover, it was a handsome boulevardier to him. He believed that Gaston had a right to have home, to be loved and treated well like anyone else. In order to make his daughter believe that, he ate the rest of the peach without hesitation just to show the girl the open halves, where Gaston belonged. The girl was so naïve, she believed in what her father said and that was a…
Cosette and Jean Valjean undoubtedly represent the strongest parent-child relationship throughout the whole novel, and therefore, provides the clearest illustration of Hugo’s love theme. When Jean Valjean first “saw Cosette, when he had taken her, carried her away and rescued her, he felt his heart moved”(Hugo, 183). After the death of Cosette’s and finding the little girl in such poor condition, the white-haired man feels obliged to take care of the poor girl. Not much time goes by before Cosette starts calling the man who “rescued”(183) her a “Father”(183), and they begin to love each other. Their love becomes so great that Jean Valjean compares the time he found Cosette to the life-changing day he meets the Bishop. His experience is described as, "the second white vision he had seen.…
affection for Meursault shows a deeper emotional attachment. Though Marie is disappointed when Meursault expresses his view toward love and marriage, she does not end the relationship or reconsider her desire to marry him. In fact, Meursault’s strange behavior seems attract her to him more. She says that she probably loves him because he is so different. She enjoys a good deal…
It is also tragic that upon hearing and forgiving Nora of her ‘crime’, Helmer doesn’t realise that he isn’t being the ideal husband when he claims that “she has become his property in a double sense…not only his wife but also his child.” Ibsen implies that Helmer is incapable of understanding love and marriage based on equality.…
In the 19th century of France most of the children were poor orphans because parents could not provide for their children. Usually they would throw the boys on the streets but keep the girls because they could make profit off of them. However, some orphans like Cosette as portrayed in Les Miserables found someone who would love and care for them. Upon careful research this paper will show not only how Jean Valjean helped Cosette but also how he hindered her. In this case Jean Valjean represents the allegory of the New France and Cosette represents the women of France, so the way Valjean treats her shows us how the New France treated women.…
Marriage is a social union or legal contract between a man and a woman. This bond that they have is supposed to be unbreakable, strong, and they are supposed to mutually love each other. In the 1800’s, this was not usually the case. The wife’s sole purpose in life was to reproduce and spend the rest of their lives serving their husband. In Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”, Louise Mallard was married to Brently Mallard who had never looked save with love upon her. Even though he loved her, he was controlling, there would be no powerful will bending hers. Many marriages during this time period were like this. Because Brently was controlling, Louise was unhappy in the marriage. Louise was internally conflicted due to this unhappy marriage.…