Labour impacted the lives of those who were in 'disease', also known as bad health,massively as their reforms gave financial and practical benefits that helped those who struggled not only with illness but things like the financial cost of care as well. Before 1948 most health care had to be paid for. This put difficult financial pressures on individuals and families and often contributed to people falling into poverty. These individuals would often rely on the support of friends, neighbours and local charities for assistance in times of medical difficulties. However, on the 5 July 1948 the National Health Service (NHS) was introduced which was based on three main aims; it would be universal, it would be comprehensive and finally it was free at the point of use. This offered great assurance at the time to the people of Britain as they felt they would no longer have to worry about things like not being able to pay for treatment and that they could now rely on being treated and assisted in times of health problems.
However, the NHS was a huge cost and the extent of ill-health across the population meant its budget rose from £228 million in 1948 to £356 million in 1950. This huge cost would have slowed Britain's recovery from war and the government consider altering policies in order to reduce running costs. In 1951, to the discontent of some Labour politicians like Bevan who was the Minister for Health, these changes materialised as the government charged adults half the cost of false teeth and spectacles. This fundamentally broke the aim of healthcare being free at point of use and would have left not only politicians but many in the public worried that further cuts may take place that would affect the NHS and therefore their own health treatment. Overall, the welfare reforms that Labour introduced had a monumental and positive effect on the lives of British people as it affected the lives of everyone not only in the past, but also in the present day as well.
Another great impact that Labour had during their welfare reforms was in the aspect of 'want', which was also known as poverty, as they tried to enable people to insurance and benefits that would have helped prevent people from falling into the dangerous depths of poverty. In 1945 the Family Allowance act was implemented. It was set up to attack household poverty. They did this by giving a small amount of payment to mothers of two or more children and it was not means tested. This would have given great responsibility to mothers who were recognised as being able to buy what the children and household needed. This would have also reduced the chances of households going into poverty as the money was not able to be wasted by the man of the house who was often perceived to spend money on alcohol and going to the local pub. In the following year the Industrial Injuries Act was put in place enabled every worker the right to compensation that was paid for by the government. This was a significant improvement on previous legislation which made it very expensive for a worker to claim. Furthermore, this new act made it far easier for workers to prove injury or disability had been caused by their job and the fact that it cost them nothing meant they did not have to worry about the financial hardship of claiming that was experienced prior to 1946.
Also, in 1948 the National Assistance Act was set up which benefited people who were not in work or who had not paid enough contributions to qualify for full benefit. People in need could apply for further assistance from national assistance boards where they were means tested and received money from the government. This money was raised through taxes and was not a matter for local administration. This provided a new social security structure and provided a safety net so people could be spared from falling into a serious state of poverty. These insurance acts removed the fear of poverty for vast amounts of people. Labours positive impact of help and assurance that was also created by these new policies created the feeling in many British people that the party really did look after the welfare of its citizens.
Labour significantly impacted the lives of people who were struggling with 'squala' as they tried hard during tough economic times to regenerate many towns and individual buildings throughout Britain. 'Squala' was the name given towards bad housing. This deterioration was apparent in 1945 where most of Britain's cities had slum like areas and overcrowding, which was made worst by the bomb damage during the war. People felt that Britain needed a rebuilding programme to generate more properties and so they could feel safe and secure in well made accommodation. Labour listened to these calls and set about an aim to build at least 200,000 houses each year. Although, for the first few years they failed in this aim, by 1948 they managed to build well in excess of the target and this trend even exceeded to 1951. This was a great improvement as the new council houses on the outskirts of cities especially were seen as saviours for people who wanted to move out of the cramped and polluted conditions of city centre living at the time.
Also, the fact that council housing rent was one third of that of the private sector meant people found it easier to pay for the day to day cost of living which included bills and general shopping. In 1946 the new Towns Act laid plans for 14 new towns to be built that would help accommodate the lack of housing and help people get out of the unfavourable cities. The Government decided where to build the towns and by the end of 1951 had succeeded in establishing the aim of building 14 of them. These towns and new housing in general would have created a healthy and pleasant environment for people to live in which would have improved not only their lives but further generations to come.
Labours impact on tackling 'Ignorance' was only slightly significant in improving people's lives as the proposals introduced were increasingly criticised by many who saw the new legislation as divisive. 'Ignorance' is also known as bad education and before 1939 children did not receive schooling after primary school. This was tackled by the Education Act of 1944 (Scotland 1945) which raised the leaving age to 15 and offered free education. This would have given children better opportunities to get more qualifications and it would have given poorer children the opportunity to try and get good jobs. This would then enable them to bring up their own children in a healthier and financially stable environment. The act also aimed to offer equality through opportunity and allow the working class to progress through school without being restricted through things like financial cost.
However, it soon became apparent that the reality of the act was rather different from its original aims. A R.A. butler set up a three tier system of technical, grammar and secondary modern schools. In Scotland the last two were known as senior and junior secondary. The system soon became very divisive as quickly the Grammar schools were seen as the 'best'. This made people extremely angry as they saw the only real opportunities as going towards these pupils. In Scotland the eleven plus exams put great pressure on pupils due to the fact that if they failed it meant they could not go to a Grammar school and faced a world of 'inferior' education. The system also baffled many Labour politicians who did not understand the system and saw it as a waste of money that would be better spent elsewhere. Although Butler had never intended such harsh decisions to be made about children and was doing it in his and the countries best interests the reality of his proposals did become increasingly criticised. The decisions that he and Labour made would have impacted virtually all of Britain's children at the time and would have improved those who were clever enough, however for those children that were not they faced a difficult education with a lack of serious opportunities once they left school.
Labour also only had a minor impact on the lives of people British people who were experiencing 'Idleness' as although they did try to stick to a policy of full employment many do not credit the Labour Party with taking full responsibility for maintaining the goal of ' jobs for all'. ' Idleness', known as unemployment, was a problem which Labour tried to solve with nationalisation. This had its roots in Labours socialist beliefs and was adopted as part policy after WW1. In theory it meant that the government would take over major industries and run them for the benefits of the country. This sounded very positive to many as they thought it would mean the economy being run more effectively and would help retain full employment. Many revisionists believe however that the Labour Party was not totally responsible for maintaining the employment goal. Although the eventual figures tumbled to full employment' they simple believe that it was down to the boom in private investment and building after 1945. This soaked up many workers after the war to try and rebuild Britain. Although the Labour Party gladly took the credit for reducing unemployment the fact that it was down to private investment and not their actual policies shows that they had little impact on improving the job situation in Britain.
In conclusion, the Labour welfare changes that were introduced between 1945 and 1951 had varying levels of positive impact in the lives of British people.
On the one hand, the way Labour dealt with disease had the biggest impact as their health acts like the NHS are still in existence today and have been used to save vigorous amounts of lives. The changes that they implemented with poverty through different insurance and benefits also had a great impact as it significantly reduced the chance of people falling into serious poverty. A large impact was also the work that they did with bad housing as they improved the number of available houses and the living conditions that people actually lived in. On the other hand, Labour only had a slight impact on people's lives when trying to improve education as the legislation introduced only benefited some children and affected the future prospects of many more. Labour also only had a minor impact on tackling the issue of unemployment as it was down to private investors and not really a result of Labour that unemployment figures tumbled. Overall, the Labour Party did exceptionally well considering the tough economic times that their Government and Britain were experiencing. They brought positive welfare changes to all ages and groups of society and laid policies that are still in use in modern day Britain today. This is why the Labour Government and their welfare reforms had a significantly positive effect on the lives of British people between 1945 and 1951.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What were the key changes in welfare provision under Margaret Thatcher (1979 – 1990) and what political ideas influenced these changes? Give examples from specific social policy areas.…
- 2160 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
‘The NHS dates back to July 1948, and was started by Health secretary Aneurin Bevan with the opening of Park Hospital in Manchester. This was a hugely ambitious plan and the first of its kind to bring together hospitals, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, opticians, and dentists in one organisation to provide a free health service to all. The NHS was a luxury when at the time there was still food rationing, a shortage of houses, also the dollar economic crisis and fuel shortages.’ (www.NHS.uk)…
- 2965 Words
- 12 Pages
Best Essays -
NHS was launched in 1948 to give residents of England health care such as surgery, treat coughs and colds and to provide end of life care. The NHS till today still provides a free health service for the UK residents. The NHS covers over 62 million peoples health in the UK this shows us that the NHS is an important part of the UK, there are 103,912 hospital and community health services in the UK. NHS are a large organisation and have to deal with a lot of people this mean that they have to employ a lot of skilled works ,NHS currently have 1.4 million people employed.…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Labour Party growth was a key factor in the Liberal Governments desire to introduce reforms affecting children as the Labour Part was emerging as the party for the working class, a position that the Liberals had previously held. In the 1906 elections the Labour Party had gained 30 seats where previously they had held 2 after the 1900 election, between 1907-09 they also made some gains in by elections. David Lloyd George summarised the position of the Liberal Government in a speech where he said that the only way to guarantee Liberal support was through reform. This meant that through the years’ jop 1906-08 the Liberal government passed reforms that affected children as it was hoped it would guarantee support from the parents of the working class as it would be clear that the Liberal Government was interested in helping the working class. Growth of the Liberal Party also resulted in the development of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party which also contributed to the reforms for children.…
- 690 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There was a growing awareness of poverty in Britain, especially in London in early 1900s. According to the research of Charles Booth in London, there were 25% of people that were living under abject poverty and over 35% of people were living under the poverty line of 0.90-1.05 pounds per week for a family with 3 children. The situation was severe and that was not only happening in London, but other cities as well. According to Seebhom Rowntree’s studies, there were 28% of people that lives in York could not afford to buy clothing and food. Social reform was definitely needed. At that time, some other new liberalism were arising, they aimed to give out minimum living standard for needy families. In contrast, the conservative was not doing anything good and the Education Act that did not please the society. As a result, a party that was providing more benefit to citizens and poverty became more successful and gained more voter’s…
- 1006 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Aneruin Bevan the health minister helped get the act through Parliament. Doctors feared that they would have to give up their private practices. The government allowed the consultants to keep their private practices but only work on a part-time basis. The doctors were also given money for each patient they had in their practice. The NHS provided free medical, dental and optical treatment. The NHS prescriptions rose from 7 to 13.5 million between 1945-1948 because people kept going to the NHS since it was free. The main problem was funding the NHS through tax. In 1950 the NHS was costing £358 million a year and the Government introduced charges for spectacle and dental treatment. Plans for new hospitals and health centres were shelved and Birch said that the NHS was ‘the single greatest achievement in the story of the welfare…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The national assistance act helped reduce poverty because it gave anybody in need benefits, this was the last defence for extreme poverty. For disease the national health service was introduced. This was to improve health care in Britain. In 1948 despite opposition of some health care professionals, that insisted on working privately still, Aneurin Bevan brought in the NHS. This made doctors, hospitals, dentists, opticians, ambulances, midwives and health visitors available and free to anybody.…
- 1420 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The Liberals created many reforms which impacted the lives of British people differing between aid and attention for well being of all ages and insurance for the unemployed or sick. This essay will investigate whether they were of positive or negative on the British people.…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some historians believed the government only took little action against poverty as socials commentators Booth and Rowntree showed it wasn’t the individuals fault. Winston Churchill summed up the aim of the liberals as he said This means that the liberal government provided very little help to the lower class so that they could help themselves escape poverty. Historians alleged that it could be estimated that as much as one third of the population would have been below the poverty line before the reforms and people feel no other government could have handled the issue of poverty any better at that time which shows the liberals were as successful as they could be towards the five social groups. However The Liberal Government largely focused on specific difficulties in society but failed to introduce solutions to deal with issues such as housing or National Health Service that affects everyone. This shows that the Liberal reforms 1906-1914 were only successful on a small scale as it was unable to improve the poverty levels of the whole…
- 1589 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Doctors, the BMA (British Medical Association) were also very much against this because doctors did not wish to become ‘mere salaried servants’ and they saw the NHS as a form of nationalisation which treated the medical profession as if it was an industry.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…
- 562 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When the war ended in 1945, the Labour Government, led by Clement Atlee, were faced with tackling numerous problems that existed in Britain. Their aim was to meet the welfare needs of the British people who, during the war, got used to support provided by the government. In 1942, a Civil Servant and an experienced worker on social welfare named William Beveridge constructed a report which would go on to become the basis for the Labour reforms. By 1951, Labour had introduced many different reforms aiming to tackle the problems that faced Britain. The Beveridge Report identified what is known as the 5 giants; these include disease, want, squalor, idleness and ignorance. Arguably the most important and successful were the acts introduced to tackle disease and want, but some may disagree. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Labour government met most of the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
How important were concerns about the extent of poverty in Britain in the Liberal Governments decision to introduce social reforms between 1906 and 1914?…
- 1097 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
During 1906-12 when the Liberal Party were in power started the Liberal Reforms, which were several programmes with the intent to help British citizens living in poverty. There is a debate amongst historians whether or not the Liberal Reforms were effective and helped the people living in poverty. The quote from the historian Martin Pugh suggests that the reforms were not introduced to create a welfare state but only focusing on solving specific problems that poor people have faced. There are other interpretations that further support Pugh’s interpretations and there are interpretations that go against Pugh’s interpretation. There were acts of parliament that were trying to help the elderly and the main one was Old Age Pension in 1908 which…
- 1536 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
After two unsuccessful electoral campaigns in the late 19th century and early 20th century, numerous splits in the party after William Gladstone's retirement, and the growing awareness of the issue of poverty within the UK, key figures within the Liberal party realised a change in the direction of Liberalism was required. They pushed for 'New Liberalism', a more modern form of Liberalism that stressed numerous key fundamental values, one of which was that intervention by the state was key in establishing a minimum quality of life for people within the country. Thus from their electoral triumph in 1906, and especially from 1908 onwards, the Liberal government passed a series of social and welfare reforms in an attempt to raise the quality of living standards within the UK. The Liberals based these reforms on three main groups within society, the elderly, the young, and the unemployed. This essay will explore several of the reforms the Liberal government introduced including the National Insurance act, the old age pensions act, a selection of educational acts, as well as acts regarding employment issues; assessing the aims of the acts and arguing how successful they actually proved to be in reducing the issue of poverty in the UK.…
- 1369 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays