Preview

Bioterrorism: The Pros And Cons Of Biological Warfare

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bioterrorism: The Pros And Cons Of Biological Warfare
Bioterrorism (Biological Warfare) is defined as the usage of infectious agents in killing or causing injuries to human’s, plants, and animals. It has been used all over the world by many different countries. Along with nuclear and chemical weapons, biological weapons are classified as a Weapon of Mass Destruction (2). It’s a mass destruction weapon because of it being highly contagious and having the ability to spread, creating a “blast radius” that is virtually endless. The reason why the impact of bioterrorism is so big nowadays is because powerful nations have the technology to create and also vaccinate different diseases while their weaker counter parts cannot (4).
The CDC (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) subdivided into
…show more content…
There are a lot more reasons why it’s bad. One of the biggest disadvantages of biological warfare it its nature of being unpredictable (2). Going back to World War two, Japan had a biowarfare unit. The biggest accomplishment from this group is they infected Chinese wells with Cholera. Statistics from the Health Resource Fund say that for every attack it caused about 10,000 casualties. It was a successful operation by the Japanese until, it ran rampant and they lost control. That incident accidentally killed 1,700 Japanese troops …show more content…
I however think that it’s perfectly appropriate in the name of war only if some other country attacked us first. Another controversial topic that ties in perfectly to this topic is the nuclear bomb and the death of thousands in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I only support this devastating attack because of what Japan did to the U.S and the bombing of Pearl Harbor. I do not support it when we do it just to kill thousands of people without a reason. It’s a lot cheaper and easier to create pathogens then to invent new form of weaponry in the gun or tank department. The U.S is a very powerful county with a big target on it for terrorist attacks. I like the thought of Biological engineered viruses because they can be used to create a sense of fear in the eyes of terrorists all over the world. People always say fear keeps you alive, so, if we can put fear in the eyes of people without killing them. Sickness is a natural part of life. Everyone gets sick eventually. Using pathogens almost seems natural, at least more natural than using guns. The main reason I support biowarfare is that it’s a lot safer to American soldiers to release a disease to cripple the bad guys than to send all these young men and women into the middle of a gunfight where many of them are shot and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cj 384 Chapter 9

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What type of terrorist attack would you fear most? Bioterrorism because it involves chemical weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Laurie Garrett, author of “Biology’s Brave New World,” biology and politics are more related than you may think. Garrett’s article, originally published in Foreign Affairs, explores the world of synthetic genomics, a branch of bioengineering in which biologists code DNA sequences to create organisms born from computer code, instead of from earth’s natural evolutionary processes. This groundbreaking research marks the beginning of a new era in which biologists can tinker with living organisms in order to achieve desired effects. Though this opens the door for creating better immunizations and bacterial colonies that can glow in the presence of poison, this also opens the door for sophisticated bioweapons, targeted bioterrorism pathogens, and artificial superbugs capable of destroying the population. Called the “dual-use research of concern,” Garrett explains that synthetic genomics research has both beneficial and devastating implications. However, she asserts that the negative implications should not justify terminating this kind of research. Instead, Garrett advocates for…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthrax Informative Speech

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine you are walking to work on a Monday. As you walk you see a light mist in front of you, thinking nothing of it, you walk into the fog. Within seconds of inhaling the mist you collapse to the ground shaking violently, unable to breathe. Within minutes you and countless people around you are dead. What just happened was a chemical weapon attack with the nerve gas VX, one of the many chemical weapons out there in military warehouses and labs. Biological warfare is the deadly sister to chemical warfare, it uses diseases such as botulism and anthrax to try to wipe out soldiers and civilians alike. Even with the horrible side effects, if the weapons are caught early enough they can be treated and major…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The environment surrounding the attack will be susceptible to the pathogens and because of the increases ignorance of disease transmission, the risks are even greater in stake. (Guillemin, p. 22) A prime example of mass devastation due to contamination of the environment is through agroterrorism. Agroterrorism is a serious threat to society as it is a deliberate exposure of biological agents to the population's food supply. If the government were to face this problem, there would be a plethora of different dilemmas since the U.S. main food supply is also a fundamental aspect of the economy. The U.S. Great Plains is often referred to as the Breadbasket of the world, any potential substances that could contaminate the area would devastate the U.S. economy and direct food supply. Also, people will be easily susceptible to the pathogens- especially in densely packed populations. Nations will not be ready or prepared, “similar to the influenza flu that was caught in America and killed more than 600,00 people. (Espejo, p. 20) If a population’s living conditions happened to be tightly packed, the chance for the diffusion of the disease is to increase a great amount; close contact of people allow for the bacteria to travel much easier. Incidental, physical contact to an open sneeze or cough are just some examples these dangerous pathogens can travel.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An early voice concerned about the social and ethical implications of modern genetic technologies, CRG organized a 1985 Congressional Briefing and a 1986 panel of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, both focusing on the potential dangers of genetically engineered biological weapons. Francis Boyle was asked to draft legislation setting limits on the use of genetic engineering, leading to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans have used biochemical weapons for thousands of years. One of the first notable uses of biochemical weapons was during the black plaque. Castles would catapult deceased victims of the plaque at enemies (Unknown 5). Another example is in the 1700s European soldiers gave smallpox infected blankets to Native American tribes. Although these were primitive ways of spreading a disease, they worked very well. Imagine the person you’re sitting next to on an airplane sneezes. That sneeze could contain a chemically engineered bacteria that could have the potential to wipe out the human race. Right now there are two known locations of the smallpox virus, the USA and Russia. If either of those countries happen to release it, it would start a war on bacteria. Also, there’s a possibility that there’s a crazy scientist out there working on a superbug. He or she could release it at an airport and the entire world would stop. We’d have medical guinnesses working day and night trying to create a medicine to stop it. There would be major losses to the entire world population. A biochemical weapon has the potential to bring the world to its…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Bioterrorism remains a major threat for the United States despite more than $65 billion spent on protecting the country from myriad dangers, the Bipartisan WMD Terrorism Research Center said in its latest report Wednesday. The center's Bio-Response Report Card evaluated U.S. preparedness for countering threats from bioterrorism and found the country remains vulnerable to multiple threats and "largely unprepared for a large-scale bioterrorist attack."”(UPI.com, 2011). There have been over a dozen leading U.S. bio-defense experts that have taken part in figuring out where we are exactly as a county and what the effects of a terroristic attack would be if it were to happen today. Through their investigation they are looking into what more can and needs to be done to deal with bioterrorism, so in turn their focus turned to what took about in the overall defense strategies after the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weapons of Mass Destruction: defined as any chemical or biological weapons, and any and all nuclear weapons.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The risk that many individuals are concerned about is the intentional and calculated use of the research information to do harm to national security, public health, and environment (Biotechnology and the Law 367). Bioterrorism is one potential risk for misuse, there are many individuals that would use the knowledge of a scientific research to develop harmful weapons than…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Govt

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The current threat can either be biological or chemical. Both would cause disaster to the American society. Potentially biological warfare could be more harmful. As stated, Biological agents are difficult to control but relatively easy to produce. Terrorists may find them to be effective weapons.(White, 2012) p.139…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical or other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to man-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere. These weapons were developed initially by industrialized nations liks United States, Japan, Germany etc as a weapon of self defence to deter the enemy against any possible aggression and attack (Deterrence theory of international politics). However, in due course of time these weapons emerged as a threat to the very existence of human race on this planet. The deterrence theory failed to prevent wars and battles between nations and rather led to beginning of an arms race between nations. India and Pakistan, 2 south asian neighbours developed nuclear weapons in 1998 but still had a war in 1999 and still have skirmishes on their borders on almost daily basis.…

    • 689 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biological Weapons

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Biological weapons include any organism (such as bacteria, viruses, or fungi) or toxin found in nature that can be used to kill or injure a person. The history of biological weapons starts back way before many people realize. Biological weapons have quite a few advantages and disadvantages. Biological weapons have been used as agents of terror and will continue to be used as such. Biological weapons are extremely dangerous and shouldn’t be used because they have the potential to wipe out entire populations of people.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oilh

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hospitals are overworked, and the emphasis is on wound treatment, with prevention of disease a secondary concern…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Will Weapons of Mass Destruction constitute a likely prospect in the future? Terrorist attacks loom in the minds of people. The attacks on September 11, 2001 caused a riveting and escalating concern that terrorist organizations may resort to weapons of mass destruction to achieve a higher level of destruction and casualties in the future. Even though the idea of Weapons of Mass Destruction may seem inevitable to some people, I pose that it is not a likely prospect in the future due to the history of unsuccessful attempts, difficulties in the production of the weapons, and the risks and technical skills needed to accomplish the feat.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many countries around the world possess weapons of mass destruction and this is very dangerous for the environment. With biological, chemical and radiological weapons being used in many wars, it damages our…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays