The overall feelings of this story differ due to changes in the setting of each. In the short story version of The Birds the mood is made to feel claustrophobic. De Maurier sets the atmosphere by saying The boards were strong against the windows, and on the chimneys too (du Maurier 72). The purpose of this is to make the reader feel trapped. If the reader feels trapped by the birds, there is a sense of tragedy and no hope for survival. In Hitchcocks version, the setting is open. He does this so that when the birds attack there isnt so much a feeling of tragedy as there is a sudden feeling of fright. Also the open setting gives a feeling of hope. To give the audience and final sense of relief Hitchcock wrote into the script It looks... it looks clear up ahead, said Mitch at the end of the movie. He said this because the roads were beginning to clear of birds and he knew that Melanie would make it safely to the hospital.
Also, each version has its own overall impression. du Mauriers version is very tragic. The audience feels this tragedy when de Maurier writes He climbed on to the roof also, and fixed boards across every chimney, except the kitchen, (du Maurier 71). At the end of the story the characters board up the house and it gives the reader very little feeling of hope. This makes the reader focus strongly on the mood rather than the action in the story. Such as when The moment the child has dropped, Mitch suddenly looks up. He slams the window as two or three birds crash into the windows. They disappear into the building,(http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/b/the-birds-script-screenplay.html, lines 1809-1811) The film has sudden frightening action. Almost always the setting is open, so that there is never a place to hide. Hitchcock does this to excite the audience and leave them with a good impression of him and his film.
Most noticeably each of the stories are set in different cities. Alfred Hitchcock moved the story from its original setting in England. He did this because California is known to be always sunny. With the sunny setting of California he is able to add glamour to his story. Along with the glamour he is able to add a love story into this horror film. . Is it going to snow, dad? she said. Its cold enough. [...] No, he said, its not going to snow. This is a black winter, not a white one (de Maurier 51). England was to be perceived as a dark place in this story. Du Maurier was not trying to make anything glamorous or twist in a love story. She wanted to write a story about a tragic event that left England in destruction with no hope at the end.
To change the mood and detailed plot of the story Alfred Hitchcock moved the setting of The Birds from England to California, and by doing this changes Daphne du Mauriers feeling of claustrophobia in a dark space to an open setting, tragic moments seem suddenly frightening and a dark dreary place to a sunny glamours area. He even changed the characters to better suit his story and twist in a love story. Even though both authors share the name of a story and a similar plot they obviously have different ideas on how the tale should be told.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Tweet Tweet! Caw Caw!! In the movie, “Birds”, by Alfred Hitchcock, the birds are attacking because Melanie Daniel’s location defines when and where the birds attack. The birds begin acting strange upon her arrival, and there are behavior changes at her stay. When leaving Bodega Bay, the birds become normal again.…
- 1307 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Alfred Hitchcock’s motion picture Psycho, released in 1960, contains peculiar placement of predatory birds and other fowls with corresponding lines about birds from Norman Bates, the primary antagonist. The most obvious reference to birds takes place in the parlor of the Bates Motel where Marion shares her last meal with Norman. As Norman invites Marion into the parlor, he sets the food tray on the coffee table and turns on the lamp. Immediately, Marion’s eyes point the camera to two birds mounted on the walls: an owl with full spread wings in the corner and a black raven hovering over the couch. Marion enters the room and takes her place on the couch under the raven while Norman sits across the intimidating glare of the owl and under another…
- 706 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the movie, The Birds, Hitchcock was very impressive in his dramatic techniques because of the tension it built in various scenes made this film accomplish it horror genre in addition to suspense. Hitchcock had fooled viewers thinking the film was comedy because of the use of…
- 258 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hitchcock is leaving you with your own imagination. When the camera track’s back, you imagine what is going on behind the windows…
- 5782 Words
- 19 Pages
Good Essays -
Birdsong employs graphic imagery in place of visual representation. Where as in “Journey’s End” we get the description of how “Mr Raleigh’s been ‘it sir. Bit of shell’s got ‘im in the back”, in “Birdsong” when Douglas is injured we are provided with a vivid description of how Stephen’s “hand was going in towards the man’s lung” and how “his blood ran up the inside of Stephen’s uniform. It was on his face and in his hair.” The mental images the text produces however are far much more striking than those in “Journey’s End”; the fact that we are given a stream of consciousness lets us relate to the actual experience a lot more. Stephen’s mental note that the blood “had a peculiar smell, not unpleasant itself …it was fresh; it was like the smell at the back of a butcher’s shop” makes the sensory experience we envisage more poignant than the visual experience of a play.…
- 2793 Words
- 12 Pages
Better Essays -
One such thing that was the same throughout both was the amount of cruelty that the prisoners were forced to go through. They were mentally and physically tortured, starved, and treated very poorly overall. A major difference between the movie and the novel at this point was the arrival of the "Bird." The "Bird" was a nickname given by the prisoners to a particularly cruel officer named Watanabe Mitsushiro. In the movie, the "Bird" was already stationed at the camp when Louie arrived, but in the book Louie had already been in the camp for a time before the "Bird" arrived. From this point on, the movie and the book have many similarities. One such similarity is the immediate interest that the "Bird" showed in Louie. The "Bird" was extremely cruel and violent towards the prisoners and in particular towards Louie. He was vicious and relentless in his cruelty towards Louie, but it was portrayed differently in the movie and the book. In the book, the "Bird" was a psychopath and would sometimes be seen frothing at the mouth while beating an unfortunate prisoner. He would then force the men to do humiliating deeds, much of the time driving the poor man to the brink of insanity. Yet even though he hated the prisoners, he always asked their forgiveness once the beatings stopped. He would even be seen sobbing and comforting those whom he had violently…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion “The Osage Firebird,” and “A Life Painting Animals” are very similar and alike in many ways. The women in the passages, both have to overcome obstacles in their lives. “The Osage Firebird” is set up in a way that the reader receives all of the information about the main character, without leaving gaps. On the other hand, “A Life Painting Animals” leaves many gaps that don’t help tie the passage together as a whole. Both passages inform the reader about ways that these women have overcome obstacles in their…
- 361 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To conclude, the author uses diction and metaphors to describe the bird’s song. Through the use of these literary devices, the author shows how the birds’ songs are powerful, and how quickly their songs’ end once the sun has fully…
- 316 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
▪ The fact that both birds are caged clearly indicates a feeling of entrapment. The ability to spread wings and fly is a symbolic theme that occurs often in the novel.…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
If you had to choose a better main character, either from the story or the movie “The Birds”. Who do you think is the better protagonist? In both the short story and film. Birds from different species started working together. And the birds start to organize and attack everyone. I think Melanie Daniels and Mitch Brenner are the best protagonists. Because, Melanie Daniels goes and warns everyone.…
- 245 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Birds: Birds are symbolic of the Victorian era women present in the story, just as the cages they are placed in mirror the societal restraints placed upon these women by the creole society. As the birds scream “Go away! Go away! For God’s sake" it is understood that this restriction of sorts is not always accepted, rather a select few instead reject them, enter our main character Edna.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the film of “The Birds the main characters consisted of Melanie Davis, Mitch Brenner, Annie Hayworth, Cathy Brenner, and Lydia Brenner. The film took place in the 1960s in two parts of California. The way the birds first attacked in the film was similar to the way they first attacked in the short story, in the film a sea gull swooped down and scratched Melanie Davis’ head. The main characters were very concerned with the birds behavior after the first attack and they took all of the signs and warnings seriously. They protected their homes by hanging wooden planks on their doors and windows. In the film police officers did not do anything to stop the attacks, they thought everything was normal. At the end of the film, the main characters manage to escape their home and head back to San Francisco while the…
- 410 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Apart from the necessary name changes, some major differences between both portrayals are who narrated each story and the development of a “secondary” plot in Saints At the River. Both accounts are seen…
- 604 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
John Wayne plays the character of Hondo Lane in the novel turned 1953 film “Hondo.” Hondo is about a rough tough cowboy who makes his way through the scorching heat of the Arizona desert with only his ornery mangy dog, Sam, for a companion. All along the way, doing his best to avoid the Apache Indians who despise the white people. In need of a horse, Hondo stumbles upon a ranch. Angie Lowe, the owner of the ranch, played by Geraldine Page, lives there with her 6 year old son Johnny. Angie explains away the absence of her husband that “he’s up in the hills working with some cattle”. Hondo deduces that Angie’s husband has been gone much longer than she says as the work around the ranch has been neglected for quite some time. When confronted, Angie is forced to admit it. After a short time at the ranch, as Hondo prepares to return to his cavalry post, he urges Angie and Johnny to come along, for they are living alone in dangerous Apache country. She chooses to remain insisting that the Indians are friendly and will not attack her.…
- 2251 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
In both passages it is noted that the number of birds is far too great to count. Both passages make use of metaphors and similes to make the description of the flocks more vivid. In Audubon's passage the birds are likened to a giant serpent. In Dillard's they are an unending banner. Both authors engage multiple senses by describing not just the sight but also the tremendous sound that so many birds make.…
- 555 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays