Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra
Identifying the early adopters of alternative fuel vehicles: A case study of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Amy R. Campbell a,⇑, Tim Ryley a,1, Rob Thring b,2 a b
Transport Studies Group, School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 November 2011
Received in revised form 29 March 2012
Accepted 16 May 2012
Keywords:
Alternative fuel vehicles
Electric vehicles
Early adopters
Driver characteristics
Cluster analysis
a b s t r a c t
The transport sector has been identified as a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. As part of its emissions reduction strategy, the United Kingdom Government is demonstrating support for new vehicle technologies, paying attention, in particular, to electric vehicles.
Cluster analysis was applied to Census data in order to identify potential alternative fuel vehicle drivers in the city of Birmingham, United Kingdom. The clustering was undertaken based on characteristics of age, income, car ownership, home ownership, socio-economic status and education. Almost 60% of areas that most closely fitted the profile of an alternative fuel vehicle driver were found to be located across four wards furthest from Birmingham city centre, while the areas with the poorest fit were located towards the centre of
Birmingham. The paper demonstrates how Census data can be used in the initial stages of identifying potential early adopters of alternative vehicle drivers. It also shows how such research can provide scope for infrastructure planning and policy development for local and national authorities, while also providing useful marketing
References: Anable, J., 2005. Complacent car addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12, 65–78. Birmingham City Council, 2009. The Birmingham declaration. Making Birmingham Green. <http://www.birminghamnewsroom.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2009/12/Birmingham-Declaration.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). Birmingham City Council, 2010. Birmingham’s Climate Change Action Plan 2010+ <http://www.bebirmingham.org.uk/uploads/Birmingham%20Climate% 20Change%20Action%20Plan.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). Birmingham City Council, 2011. Low carbon transport. <http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/cs/Satellite/evcp?packedargs=website%3D4&rendermode=live> (accessed 06.03.12). Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), 2008. Climate Change Act 2008. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/pdfs/ ukpga_20080027_en.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). ESPON, 2007. Study on Urban Functions, ESPON Project 1.4.3. Final Report. <http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ ESPON2006Projects/StudiesScientificSupportProjects/UrbanFunctions/fr-1.4.3_April2007-final.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). Gärling, A., Thøgersen, J., 2001. Marketing of electric vehicles. Business Strategy and the Environment 10, 53–65. Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., Stannard, J., 2012. Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: a qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations Gripaios, P., 2002. The failure of regeneration policy in Britain. Regional Studies 36 (5), 568–577. Hair, J.F., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., Tatham, R.L., 2005. Multivariate Data Analysis, sixth ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P., 2011. Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics 33, 686–705. House of Commons Public Administration, 2011. Official Statistics: 2011 Census Questions. Select Committee. <http://www.parliament.uk/documents/ upload/memosweb3.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). Karplus, V.J., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.M., 2010. Prospects for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the United States and Japan: a general equilibrium analysis. Kurani, K.S., Sperling, D., Lipman, T.E., Stanger, D., Turrentine, T., Stein, A., 1995. Household Markets for Neighborhood Electric Vehicles in California. Local Government Improvement and Development, 2009. Local Government Glossary. <http://www.idea.gov.uk/idk/core/page.do?pageId=7175806> (accessed 06.03.12). Low CVP, 2010. Low CVP Car Buyer Research Report: Improved Environmental Information for Consumers. <http://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/ LowCVP-Car-Buyer-Survey-2010-Final-Report-03-06-10-vFINAL.pdf> (accessed 06.03.12). Musti, S., Kockelman, K.M., 2011. Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas Nemry, F., Brons, M., 2010. Market Penetration Scenarios of Electric Drive Vehicles. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies O’Garra, T., Mourato, S., Pearson, P., 2005. Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: a London case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (6), 649–659. Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2001. National Census. Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2011. About National Statistics & ONS, Geography Glossary. <http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/geography/ beginner-s-guide/glossary/glossary-m.html> (accessed 06.03.12). Ozaki, R., Sevastyanova, K., 2011. Going hybrid: an analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy 39 (5), 2217–2227. Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, fourth ed. The Free Press, New York. Romm, J., 2006. The car and fuel of the future. Energy Policy 34, 2609–2614. Ryley, T., 2006. Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh. Journal of Transport Geography 14, 367–375. Stevens, C., 2010. Linking sustainable consumption and production: the government role. Natural Resources Forum 34, 16–23. Williams, B.D., Kurani, K.S., 2006. Estimating the early household market for light-duty hydrogen-fuel-cell vehicles and other ‘Mobile Energy’ innovations in California: a constraints analysis