In order to obtain Daniel Wood’s article, the primary database used was Google Scholars. The terms “debate of body cameras” were the most effective in finding articles on the subject. The RSS feed was filtered to limit articles based on 2015 time frame. As a result, Daniel Wood’s article was chosen because it was most recent, and acknowledged many of today’s current events of police …show more content…
Daniel Wood is the lead staff writer for The Christian Science Monitor, and shows a tremendous background on articles relating to criminal justice. In his article, he refers to events such as Rodney King, Michael Brown, and Eric Garner, to maintain a consistent argument that police brutality is a crucial issue. Therefore, he provides insight of the cause of these events and the significance they held in court. Wood’s research is credible because he personally interviews judges and other civil figures on personal experience with body camera court cases. Hence, he concludes body cameras to be useless in a court case based on the feedback of court elitist. Overall, Wood provides credible resources on today’s current events and carefully addresses his argument with a full understanding of the pros and cons of body cameras.
According to Wood, there have been many cases where video