Preview

bombey dyeing vs arun bajoria

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11125 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
bombey dyeing vs arun bajoria
Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs Arun Kumar Bajoria on 4 July, 2001
Equivalent citations: 2001 107 CompCas 535 CLB
ORDER
S. Balasubramanian
1. In this petition filed under section 111A of the Companies Act ('the Act'), the petitioner company has sought for rectification of the Register of members of Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Limited (the company) by deleting the names of respondents 1 to 6 in respect of the shares impugned in the petition on the ground that these respondents had failed to comply with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeover) Regulations 1997 (Take Over Code). This petition was originally filed before the Western Region Bench and was later on transferred to the Northern Region Bench with the consent of the parties.
2. A summary of the petition is as follows : The petitioner-company was informed by its Registrars Sharepro Services on 28-6-2000 that as per the download of the data received from National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) the first respondent along with respondents two to six had acquired and were holding shares of the petitioner-company exceeding 5 per cent as on 20-6-2000. As per the letter from Sharepro Services dated 6-6-2000, the collective percentage holding of these respondents as on 20-6-2000, was 5.3 per cent and as on 27-6-2000, it was 5.7 per cent. As per Regulation 7 of the Take Over Code, these respondents, having acquired the shares in concert, should have informed the company about their acquisition beyond 5 per cent within 4 days of such acquisition. However, they had not informed the company. Therefore, the same was reported to the SEBI by a letter dated 7-6-2000 seeking for investigation into the said acquisition. In a letter to the SEBI dated 4-8-2000, the first respondent had intimated that he along with the other respondents held as on 31-7-2000, 5244894 shares constituting 12.7 per cent shares in the company. Since these respondents had not disclosed their acquisition

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    3. Q: A Ltd. owns 75 percent of B Co. Recently a receiver, acting on behalf of…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CLAW2201 notes

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    s254A(2): Co. can ONLY issue preference shares if there are rights in constitution or it is approved by special resolution that needs >75% approval)…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insolvent Company

    • 2636 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In this case, the first issue that needs to be ascertained is, whether the directors contravene the relevant law in relation to insolvent trading. To solve this issue, it is helpful to thoroughly analyses section 588G.…

    • 2636 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HENRY VIII CLAUSE WRITE UP

    • 1863 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Administrative law is the body of law that allows for the creation of public regulatory agencies…

    • 1863 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    walmart

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The defendants had submitted that if there was an agreement, it was tainted with illegality because it is contravened with Section 67 of the Companies Act 1965 as a dealing in own shares. It was held that the defence of illegality was misfounded based on the Confirmation Letter that…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bhd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”) and Yap Cho Heeon (hereinafter referred to as “the Claimant”). The dispute is with reference to Section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 whereby the Claimant contends and considers himself to be constructively dismissed from the service of the Company with effect from 31 May 2000. This matter was heard by Y.A. Datin Yeoh Wee Siam from 16 October 2007 until 3 December 2008.…

    • 7403 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fybms Law Notes

    • 30683 Words
    • 123 Pages

    Section 3(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “An association of individuals form for some purpose and registered under the present Companies Act or an earlier Indian Companies Act.” The following are the essential features of a company 1) Separate Legal Entity - A company on registration has a separate identity of its own which is different and distinct from the members who constitute it. This principle of independent corporate personality was laid down in the case of Salomon vs. Salomon & Co. Ltd. In this case Mr. Salomon was carrying on shoe manufacturing business on proprietorship basis. He sold his business to a company Salomon & Co. Ltd. for 30,000 pounds. Salomon received consideration in the form of shares for 20,000 pounds of one pound each and got debentures worth 10,000 pounds. The company had seven members, consisting of Mr. Salomon, Mrs. Salomon, four sons and a daughter. All the other members of the company had only one share each. After sometime the company had to be wound up on account of financial difficulties. The assets realized were 6,000 pounds while the liabilities were 10,000 pounds to Salomon as a secured creditor and 7,000 pounds to outsiders who were unsecured creditors. The creditors claim priorities over Salomon (Secured Creditor) on the ground that Salomon and Salomon & Co. were one and the same. It was however, observed that the company on incorporation has a different personality different from the subscribers. Therefore the identity of the subscriber is immaterial. Hence Mr. Salomon was paid first as he was a secured creditor. 2) Limited Liability – The liability of the shareholders is limited to the face value of the shares held by them. Once the full amount of the shares is paid, they cannot be called upon to bare the loss from there personal property. 3) Artificial Legal Person – Company on…

    • 30683 Words
    • 123 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    sahara india

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three years ago, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) started making enquiries into the fund raising by two Sahara group firms based on an anonymous complaints. It soon turned into a full-blown investigation which later resulted in a protracted and high profile legal battle under the direct supervision of the Supreme Court. Even after the final order by the Supreme Court on August 31, the matter did not achieve closure as Sahara continued to make new statements and appeals in lower courts.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (3) Except as otherwise hereinafter provided, this Act shall apply to the industries to which the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Bom. XI of 1947, for the time being applies, and also to any industry as defined in clause (j) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, XIV of 1947, and the State Government in relation to any industrial dispute concerning of such industry is the appropriate Government under that Act :…

    • 10480 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consideration of application and objection. 9. 9. Grounds for refusal to register. 10. 10.…

    • 28525 Words
    • 115 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to give an opportunity to the defaulting companies to enable them to make their default good by filing belated documents and to become a regular compliant in future, the Ministry of corporate Affairs, in exercise of the powers under Section 611(2) and 637B (b) of the Companies Act, 1956 has decided to introduce the scheme condoning the delay in filing documents with the Registrar, granting immunity from prosecution and charging additional fee of 25 percent of actual additional fee payable for filing belated documents under the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made there under.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    features

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The ICAI had earlier issued Statement on the Amendment to Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 in March 1976 (as amended). Whenever guidance provided in this publication is different form the guidance in the aforesaid statement, this Guidance Note will prevail.…

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Damage” means the harm or loss suffered or presumed to be suffered by a person as a result of some wrongful act of another. The sum of money awarded by the court to compensate “damage” is called “damages”.…

    • 2440 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first allegation is the absenteeism and poor attendance. The court then referred to Claimant’s Bundle of Documents (CLB) which is the copy of company calculation of the claimant’s salary. The Claimant questioned Ms Premalatha (the HR and Admin Executive) who the one that prepared it. There is an issued that the company already plan to terminate her before DI and termination letter issued on 31…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays