Preview

Born on the 4th of July

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Born on the 4th of July
"Born on the Fourth of July"

This book was incredible! In all truth this was the first book I have ever read cover to cover. The book, by Ron Kovic, as compared to the film, by Oliver Stone, had some impressive similarities. Both the book and the film did a great job of portraying Ron's childhood in Massapequa, Long Island. From the little league games to playing war in the woods, leading charges and setting ambushes. This was especially well done in the movie, and exactly as I pictured them while reading the book. The time that he spent in Mexico was well defined in the book as well as in the film. While there were many similarities, what I feel is more important is to focus on the differences.
There were countless small differences in the film as compared to the book, things such as shuffling the order in which chapters appeared in the film. For example, the beginning of the film took a different path than the beginning of the book. In the book the first chapter set the tone for the rest of the book, describing the firefight and all that had gone wrong, Burning into your mind the thought of Ron Kovic lying on the ground bleeding, paralyzed, screaming for help and hearing people get shot all around him. The beginning of the film is a different story all together. It gives you hope, it lulls you into believing that this is a happy story, the kind where everything always works out in the end. It is not until after the entire buildup of the character, after you feel as if you know him, that you see this scene. The accidental killing of the civilians, the baby, the killing of the corporal, all these things happen before you find out that this soldier, this Marine, will come home paralyzed.
The film makes it a point to show that there was an on-going, pseudo romance between Ron and Joan Marfe. The two of them kissing on his birthday, Ron running to the prom and showing up soaking wet, asking her for a dance. Finding her after the war and going to a protest with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ever read a book, and then seen the movie? The book is usually better right? That’s most likely because of the differences. The book is more descriptive most of the time. Events in the book are missing from the movie. Or the movie adds some in.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the movie and the book share a basic concept of showing an understanding of a story being told. The book does a more in depth explanation and a better job of narrating the story. John Knowles novel, A Separate Peace, is a story about a destructive and corrupt relationship between Finny and Gene who both attend Devon School around World War ll where most boys went off to fight in the army not realizing there was already a war created within themselves, hence the title, A Separate Peace. The book does a much more effective job of telling the story compared to the movie. In the novel, the story is being told from Gene's perspective whereas in the movie, it is being told from a third persons point of view. Also, Cliff…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Star wars rotj book paper

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    more vivid explanations of some of the events and a tiny bit more of character portrayal. The book was…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two main differences exist between the movie and the novel. First, the book gives the reader more detail into Lester Burdon’s life. Lester’s father abandoned Lester and his family when Lester was a teenager. The movie mentions the abandonment, but provides no background. Lester also endured bullying as a child, and young man. The novel suggest these experiences in his youth led to some of the bad decisions made, first threatening the Colonel, and then kidnapping the Colonel and his family in order to force the Colonel into giving the house back to Kathy.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, in the movie everyone arrives by a ski lift to a cold, snowy mountain. Many of the indictments are changed between the two works. In the book, General Macarthur put his wife’s new lover in the frontline of battle, but in the book General Mandrake sends 5 men to their death. Miss Emily Brent scolds a woman into suicide in the book, while in the movie Miss Burgan kills her husband. Vera Claythorne let’s a young child drown in the book, and in the movie Ann Clide said to be responsible for the death of her sister’s fiance. Philip Lombard from the book killed a whole tribe by depriving them of provisions, while in the movie he is said to of killed the mother of his unborn child.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, one of the biggest reasons the movie is better than the book is because of the quality of the flashbacks. In the book the flashbacks were more set in the past and much longer, sometimes too drawn out and a little boring for how much background story there is for just one day dream, whereas in the movie the daydreams are a bit shorter but more set in the present and more affect by what he does in that moment with little background because of how short they are and how close to the present they may be. The daydreams are usually much more exciting in the movie as well, whereas in the book it's set back to just a boring doctor surgery, that was…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film renders a much more detailed view of a near-term future world than that present in the original book, like the film also omits certain story details for example, no punch cards. And on the other side the whole book is about 90 pages long, which is not considered a very professional length for a book. Whereas in the movie, the main characters are described and well detailed, for example its starts with John Anderton (Tom Cruise) head of an elite division of law enforcement known as "Precrime", using the visions of three clairvoyants called "Pre-Cogs," the Precrime unit is able to determine the exact date and time in the future that a murder will take place, as well as the names of the perpetrator and victim. While in the original story there's no such plot like that and it just talks about the precrime system and a bit about "pre-Cogs", and Anderton.…

    • 791 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oliver Stone’s Born on the Fourth of July an adaptation of the memoir by Vietnam veteran Ron Kovic. Tom Cruise , in a role that was a brave departure for him in 1989, plays Kovic in his adult years. Kovic grows up as a child of the American dream in 1950s Long Island. He’s a God-fearing, baseball-hitting, patriotic man who lives in an environment full of parades and malt shops. As a high school senior, young Ron doesn’t think twice about signing up for the Marines, believing that he’s doing the right thing for his country.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born on The 4th of July is a film based on the true story of Ron Kovic, a young, naïve man who went to Vietnam in the noble efforts of serving his country - once there, he was shot in the chest and was forever paralyzed. He returned to a United States which didn't believe in the war, and didn't believe in him. He soon grows embittered with life, losing his chances to be a man, condemned to a wheelchair for the rest of his life. He eventually joins the anti-war movement, gets thrown out of the Republican Convention where Richard Nixon is speaking, and finally is allowed to speak at the Democratic National Convention in 1976.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first example of this happened in the beginning where in the film only two men washed their clothes in the river, whereas the book lead readers to believe most men are in the water. Instead of the person who already knew the news tell everyone the movie a man ran from the lake and announced it in the middle of the base. Maybe the difference was not wanting to pan out on an entire lake and risk the equipment so close to the water. Now another minor, but the way the movie and book differ is that in the book a black man did assist the men. However, in the 1951 movie as far as the fifteen-minute mark all the men introduced on the screen came up as white. This most likely happened due to the severe racism that plagued society in the 1950’s. Furthermore, the biggest difference between the book and movie is the movie completely cut out any flashbacks of the young soldier’s life before the decision to enlist in the army. The entire scene where the mother and at the time a farmer went back and forth on if the boy should enlist or not, what happened after the boy signed up, the advice the mother gave before leaving, and the treatment and stories of old veterans the young man received before the arrival. Other minor things are how the book detailed the tent and surroundings far more than the movie did. Besides the whole debate of…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Dream

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A difference between the two is the way Lennie killed the pup. That is a difference because in the book when he killed the pup everything seemed more dramatic and then in the movie it seemed as though he was sad and felt bad but the feeling was not as strong as it was while reading the book. Another difference is how George killed Lennie. This was the major difference between the movie and the novella because Georges emotions were not high enough. In the story it mentioned how George was slowly and barely able to lift his arm up to kill Lennie but in the book he just immediately killed him with no hesitation and no emotions involved.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, there are scenes that differ from the book to provide more context for the situation. The beginning of the book is especially different from that of the movie. The beginning of the novel gives a long description of the setting. These opening paragraphs do an effective job of introducing a setting, and phrases like “twinkling over the yellow sands in the sunlight” and “willows fresh and green with every spring” introduce a cheerful atmosphere as well. The movie changes this completely. Instead of a lengthy and descriptive passage, the audience is…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tcap Writing

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you go and read the book of something before you go and see the movie?? If we don’t read the book before we see the movie we won’t understand the difference between the movie and the book. It is very rare that both and movie and the book are even close to being the same. In movies, most characters have been deleted and others invented. Settings have also been changed from the book to the movie. Also, the actors that are in the movie may not be anything like the characters in the books. People should spend the time to read a book before they go see the movie so they can say what they think and which one they like better.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The thirty-fifth President of the United States, John F. Kennedy once said, “Mankind must put an end to war—or war will put an end to mankind.” President Kennedy refers to the effects of war may destroy man’s morals, ideals, society, and both physicality and psychology of man. Since the beginning of time, man has engaged in conflicts with one another, resulting in not only the physical effects, but the psychological effects. Combat veterans are commonly at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. The First World War changed everything; one of the changes was shell shock and combat stress. Combat stress is a reaction known to precurse PTSD and historically linked to shell shock. All wars have their affects, both civilians and combatants have…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays