Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Bouncing Ball Experiment: Relationship between Initial Height of a Drop and Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy

Powerful Essays
2879 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bouncing Ball Experiment: Relationship between Initial Height of a Drop and Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy
An Experiment to investigate how the Initial Height of which a Ball is dropped affects its Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy

Research Question:

What is the relationship between initial height of a drop and the fractional loss of kinetic energy in a bouncing ball?

Introduction:

When an object is held at a height above the ground, it possesses gravitational potential energy (Ep = mg∆h) that is directly dependent of the mass and height of which the object is positioned above the ground. When it is dropped, Ep is converted into kinetic energy (Ek = ½ mv2), energy the object now possesses due to its motion. An inelastic collision, where an object collides with another and springs apart, occurs when the object hits the ground. According to Newton’s 3rd law, both the ground and object exert an equal but opposite force on each other upon collision, but as the ground is more massive than the object; it is the object that is rebound. However, also upon collision, kinetic energy is transformed into other types of energy, such as heat, elastic and sound energy. Therefore, the object does not return to its initial height, and will lose more and more Ep and Ek with every bounce until it is stationary.

Aim:

The aim is to determine how the initial height of which a standard basketball (≈0.06kg) is dropped (0.20m, 0.40m, 0.60m, 0.80m, 1.00m, 1.20m, 1.40m, 1.60m, 1.80m and 2.00m) will affect the fractional loss of its kinetic energy in 3 bounces.

Hypothesis:

In this investigation, the initial height of which a basketball is dropped will be altered in order to increase or decrease the fractional loss of kinetic energy within 3 bounces. The ball will rebound higher if it is dropped from a higher height than a lower height, as a result of the amount of gravitational potential energy, dependent on height above ground, converting into kinetic energy during the fall. However, kinetic energy is lost upon collision. It is possible that the same amount of energy is lost each time due to factors such as the force of friction in relation to the texture of the floor and air resistance. Therefore, if the initial height is higher, there will be more kinetic energy retained compared to a lower initial height, where less kinetic energy will be retained.

Variables:

Independent Variable
The independent variable is the initial height of which the basketball is dropped that will be increased 10 times (including the first trial) by 0.20m. These lengths will be 0.20m, 0.40m, 0.60m, 0.80m, 1.00m, 1.20m, 1.40m, 1.60m, 1.80m and 2.00m; measured out using a 1 meter ruler (±0.02m). This will be done by positioning the bottom of the basketball at the highest height, 2.00m, and decreasing it to the next smaller length, 1.80m, 1.60m and so on. Each length will be tried 4 times and averaged.

Dependent Variable
The dependent variable is the basketball’s fractional loss of kinetic energy (Ek) within 3 bounces, observed by eyesight and recorded on video. Data will be taken from the bottom of the basketball. A standard basketball will be held at a height measured against 2 meter rulers (±0.02), which allows the calculation of its gravitational potential energy through the equation gravitational potential energy = Mass x Gravity x Height, or Ep = mg∆h. In the first bounce, final Ek should equal the initial Ep, (Ekf = Epi OR ½mv2 = mg∆h). Height of rebound will then be measured and recorded in the second and third bounce, which will be used to calculate its difference to the intial Ep, and therefore the amount of Ek lost during the collision. At this point 3 values have been calculated; Ekinitial, Ekrebound and Eklost, or Ei, h2 and Eklost. The fraction of Ek lost is then calculated by the formula, (Eki – Ekf)/Eki.
For example, m= 0.60kg h= 2.00m

Initial drop

Epi = mg∆h
Epi = 0.60kg*9.81ms-2*2.00m
Epi = 11.772 J = Ekf

Bounce 1

hr1= .8m
Ep = mg∆h
Ep = 0.60kg*9.81ms-2*0.80m
Ep1 = 4.7088 J = Ekr1
Ekf – Ekr1
11.772 J - 4.7088 J
Eklost= 7.0632 J
Eki = 11.772 J
Ekf = 4.7088 J
Ekl= 7.0632 J
Fraction of Ek lost = (Eki – Ekf)/Eki
Fraction of Ek lost = (Eklost)/Eki
Fraction of Ek lost = (11.772 J – 4.7088 J)/ 11.772 J
Fraction of Ek lost = 7.0632 J /11.772 J
Fraction of Ek lost = 0.6

Controlled Variables

Variable
How variable will be controlled and measured
Possible affect on data if not controlled
Type of surface
The experiment will be carried out in the same spot, so that the ball will strike the same type of tile surface every time. There is no specified uncertainty associated with the surface; the manufacturing of the tile will be trusted.
If not controlled, this could affect the amount of Ek lost upon collision with the floor as the amount of friction compared to one type of surface, i.e stone versus wood, would vary. This would mean different amounts of Ek being converted into heat energy.
Type of ball (size, mass, material)
The same basketball will be used for all trials. This will make sure mass, size, shape, volume and material will be kept consistent. Mass of the basketball will be measured using an electronic scale (±0.001g or ±0.00001kg).
Mass could vary if ball was not kept the same, and would affect the calculation of energy as E=mg∆h. Also, the type of material impacting on the ground could affect the force of friction acting on the ball.
# of bounces
Rebound height will only be taken after the first bounce. This information will be controlled by observation of frame by frame video capture and data recording through logger pro video analysis.
More or less energy may be lost with every bounce; i.e 0.30 loss in the first bounce but 0.20 lost in the second bounce.
Temperature
Temperature in room will be monitored and kept the same at room temperature (25˚C) by keeping the air conditioner at 25˚C.
If not controlled the ball could heat up or cool down, affecting the amount of initial energy it has in total, affecting results especially after multiple trials.
Position of where height and rebound height is measured on the ball
Height and rebound height will be measured from the same point on the ball, the bottom, every time.
The uncertainty in height and rebound height will be affected and skewed, therefore affecting the calculation for fractional loss of kinetic energy.

Apparatus:

1x standard basketball
2 x 1m ruler (±0.01m)
1 x video recorder
1x retort stand w/ clamp OR tripod
1 x electronic scale (±0.00001kg)
1x roll of masking tape

Method

Part A: Set Up

1. Use masking tape to join the 2 meter sticks together so that the total length that can be measured is 2m
2. Tape meter sticks flat to a wall, making sure that it is straight from the ground to the top, as to prevent and reduce parallax error
3. Set up retort stand or tripod with video recorder at a far enough distance, eye level so that space is left between the top and bottom of meter sticks and the floor/ceiling.
4. Measure mass of basketball using electronic scale and record in data under “Data Collection” heading
5. Press record on video recorder

Part B: Collect Data

6. Position ball at highest initial drop height (2.00m)
7. Drop ball and let bounce until it comes to a complete stop
8. Repeat steps 5-7 for different initial drop heights (1.80, 1.60, 1.40… 0.20) with 4 trials each.

Part C: Extraction of h2 by Logger Pro video analysis

9. Add video into project
10. Set origin by using the “set origin” function and clicking the bottom of the meter sticks
11. Set scale by using the “set scale” function – click top of meter sticks and drag to bottom of meter sticks
12. Find point in video right before drop
13. Drop data point at the bottom of the ball (h1)
14. Find frame in video where the ball has bounced one time and is static in the air (the highest height), right about to fall again (h2)
15. Record h1 and h2 data on table (see example table below method)
16. Repeat steps 9-15 for all trials

Part D: Calculation

17. Using h1 and h2 values in table, calculate initial energy before drop (Ei) using the equation Ei = mg∆h1 and final energy after drop (Ef) using Ef= mg∆h2.
18. Calculate energy lost by Ei - Ef.
19. Calculate fractional loss of kinetic energy (Ekf) using the formula Ekf=(Ei - Ef)/ Ei.
20. Repeat steps 17-19 for all trials
21. Calculate average in h2 and Ekf by (T1+T2+T3+T4)/4

Example table(s) for data collection:

Initial Height ,h1, ±0.02m
Trial #

Initial Energy before drop, Ei, ±0.10J Ei = mg∆h1
Rebound height, h2, ±0.02m
Final energy after rebound, Ef, ±0.10 J Ef = mg∆h2
Loss of Kinetic Energy, Eklost, ±0.20 J
Eklost=Ei – Ef
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek,, ±0.02 Ek,=(Ei–Ef)/Ei
0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

Initial Height, h1, ±0.02m
Average (T1+T2+T3+T4)/4

Rebound height, h2, ±(max-min)/2
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek, ±0.10 J
2.00

1.80

1.60

1.40

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

Data Collection:

m= 0.60453kg

Table(s):

Table 1: Table to show raw results and processed calculations for Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Trial 1

Initial Height ,h1, ±0.02m
Trial 1

Initial Energy before drop, Ei, ±0.10J Ei = mg∆h1
Rebound height, h2, ±0.02m
Final energy after rebound, Ef, ±0.10 J Ef = mg∆h2
Loss of Kinetic Energy, Eklost, ±0.20 J
Eklost=Ei – Ef
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek,, ±0.02 Ek,=(Ei–Ef)/Ei
2.00
11.86
1.27
7.53
4.33
0.37
1.80
10.67
1.18
7.00
3.68
0.34
1.60
9.49
0.98
5.81
3.68
0.39
1.40
8.30
0.85
5.04
3.26
0.39
1.20
7.12
0.70
4.15
2.97
0.42
1.00
5.93
0.62
3.68
2.25
0.38
0.80
4.74
0.62
3.68
1.07
0.23
0.60
3.56
0.43
2.55
1.01
0.28
0.40
2.37
0.29
1.72
0.65
0.28
0.20
1.19
0.15
0.89
0.30
0.25

Table 2: Table to show raw results and processed calculations for Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, trial 2

Initial Height ,h1, ±0.02m
Trial 2

Initial Energy before drop, Ei, ±0.10 J Ei = mg∆h1
Rebound height, h2, ±0.02m
Final energy after rebound, Ef, ±0.10 J Ef = mg∆h2
Loss of Kinetic Energy, Eklost, ±0.20 J Eklost=Ei – Ef
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek,, ±0.02 Ek,=(Ei–Ef)/Ei
2.00
11.86
1.32
7.83
4.03
0.34
1.80
10.67
1.08
6.40
4.27
0.40
1.60
9.49
0.93
5.52
3.97
0.42
1.40
8.30
0.80
4.74
3.56
0.43
1.20
7.12
0.67
3.97
3.14
0.44
1.00
5.93
0.65
3.85
2.08
0.35
0.80
4.74
0.57
3.38
1.36
0.29
0.60
3.56
0.49
2.91
0.65
0.18
0.40
2.37
0.27
1.60
0.77
0.33
0.20
1.19
0.14
0.83
0.36
0.30

Table 3: Table to show raw results and processed calculations for Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, trial 3

Table 4: Table to show raw results and processed calculations for Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, trial 4

Initial Height ,h1, ±0.02m
Trial 4

Initial Energy before drop, Ei, ±0.10 J Ei = mg∆h1
Rebound height, h2, ±0.02m
Final energy after rebound, Ef, ±0.10 J Ef = mg∆h2
Loss of Kinetic Energy, Eklost, ±0.20 J Eklost=Ei – Ef
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek,, ±0.02 Ek,=(Ei–Ef)/Ei
2.00
11.86
1.31
7.77
4.09
0.35
1.80
10.67
1.10
6.53
4.14
0.39
1.60
9.49
0.96
5.69
3.80
0.40
1.40
8.30
0.83
4.92
3.38
0.41
1.20
7.12
0.70
4.15
2.97
0.42
1.00
5.93
0.61
3.62
2.31
0.39
0.80
4.74
0.58
3.44
1.30
0.28
0.60
3.56
0.45
2.67
0.89
0.25
0.40
2.37
0.28
1.66
0.71
0.30
0.20
1.19
0.13
0.77
0.42
0.35

Table 5: Table to show average processed calculations for Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy in relation to initial drop and rebound heigh

Initial Height, h1, ±0.02m
Average (T1+T2+T3+T4)/4

Rebound height, h2, ±(max-min)/2
Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy, Ek, ±0.10 J
2.00
1.31 ±0.03
0.35
1.80
1.09 ±0.01
0.39
1.60
0.95 ±0.03
0.41
1.40
0.83 ±0.03
0.41
1.20
0.69 ±0.02
0.43
1.00
0.62 ±0.03
0.38
0.80
0.58 ±0.01
0.28
0.60
0.44 ±0.01
0.27
0.40
0.28 ±0.01
0.30
0.20
0.14 ±0.01
0.31

Note: All crossed out / highlighted data points are outliers (1.80, trial 1, 0.80 trial 1, 0.60, trial 2) and have been disregarded in the calculation for the average data corresponding to its respective initial drop height.

Values in the columns titled ‘Initial Energy before drop, Ei’ were calculated using the formula Ei = mg∆h1, where mass m of the basketball was measured to be 0.60453±0.00001kg, g is generally accepted value for gravity 9.81ms-2, and h1 is height 0.20 – 2.00m, measured by observation upon drop and upon computerized data analysis though Logger Pro.

For example, the initial energy before drop at 2.00m, trial 1 was calculated as follows:

Ei = mg∆h1
Ei = 0.60453±0.00001kg *9.81ms-2*2.00±0.02m
Ei = 11.8608786
Ei= 11.86

∆y/y = ∆a/a + ∆b/b
∆Ei/Ei = ∆m/m + ∆h1/h1
∆Ei/11.8608786= 0.00001kg/0.60453kg + 0.02m/2.00m
(∆Ei/11.8608786)* 11.8608786= 0.0100165418*11.8608786
∆Ei= 0.118804986
∆Ei= ±0.12
∆Ei= ±0.10

∴ Ei = 11.86 ± 0.10 J with ≈ 0.84% ≈ 1% uncertainty

The values in the columns titled ‘Final Energy after drop, Ef’ were calculated using the same formula with replacement of h1 initial drop height to h2, rebound height, Ef=mg∆h2. The example below uses the h2 data from 2.00m, trial 1.

Ef = mg∆h2
Ef = 0.60453±0.00001kg *9.81ms-2*1.27±0.02m
Ef = 7.531657911 J
Ef = 7.53 J

∆y/y = ∆a/a + ∆b/b
∆Ef/Ef = ∆m/m + ∆h1/h1
∆Ei/7.531657911= 0.00001kg/0.60453kg + 0.02m/1.27m
(∆Ef/7.531657911)*7.531657911= 0.0157645733*7.531657911
∆Ef= 0.1187333732
∆Ef= ±0.12
∆Ef= ±0.10
∴ Ef = 7.5 ± 0.10 J ≈ 1.33% ≈ 1% uncertainty

‘Fractional loss of Kinetic Energy, Ekf’ is calculated using the formula Ekf= Ei-Ef/Ei. Although not used in this investigation, values in column Ekf can also be calculated using the formula 1- h2/h1. The column titled ‘Loss of Ek, Eklost’ was created to simplify the calculation of Ekf, as Eklost= Ei – Ef, part of the the Ekf formula. These values can be calculated as followed:

Eklost= Ei – Ef
Eklost= 11.86 J – 7.53 J
Eklost= 4.33 J

∆y= ∆a + ∆b
∆Eklost= ∆Ei + ∆ Ef
∆Eklost= 0.10+0.10
∆Eklost= ± 0.20
∴Eklost = 4.33 J ± 0.20 J ≈4.62% ≈ 5% uncertainty

Ekf= Ei-Ef / Ei
Ekf= Eklost / Ei
Ekf= = 4.33 J ± 0.24 J / 11.86 ±0.12
Ekf = 0.3650927487
Ekf =0.37

∆y/y = ∆a/a + ∆b/b
∆Ekf/Ekf= ∆Eklost /Eklost + ∆Ei/Ei
∆Ekf/0.3650927487= ∆0.24 /4.33 + ∆0.12/11.86
(∆Ekf/0.3650927487)*0.3650927487= (0.05542725173+ 0.010)* 0.3650927487
∆Ekf=0.02388701517
∆Ekf= ±0.02
∴Ekf = 0.37 ± 0.02 ≈ 5.41% ≈ 5% uncertainty

The averages in table 5 are calculated by adding all results associated with each initial drop height from all trails and dividing by 4; (T1+T2+T3+T4)/4. For example, the average fractional loss of kinetic energy for 2.00m was calculated as follows:

(T1+T2+T3+T4)/4
=(0.37+0.34+0.34+0.35)/4
= 0.35

However, as some data points were disregarded on the basis of being outliers, they were not taken into account for. Therefore in this case, the average was taken by adding all valid data points, i.e (T1+T2+T3)/3. For example, the average fractional loss of kinetic energy for 0.60m was calculated as follows:

(T1+T3+T4)/3
=(0.28+0.27+0.25)/3
=0.266666
= 0.27

The uncertainties for these values were calculated by (max value – min value)/2.

∆Average Ekf= (max value – min value)/2
∆Average Ekf= (0.44-0.25)/2
∆Average Ekf= ±0.095
∆Average Ekf= ±0.10

∆Average h2= (max value – min value)/2
∆Average h2= (0.45 – 0.43)/2
∆Average h2 = ±0.01m

Graph 1: Graph to show average Fractional Loss of Kinetic Energy is affected by initial drop height
Conclusion:

The results in graph 1 and table 5 show the average fractional loss of energy that correlate to the 4 trials of 10 changes to the initial drop height. Results demonstrate that increasing the initial drop height does not in fact affect the fractional loss of kinetic energy of the basketball. Instead, the average factional loss of kinetic energy stayed approximately 0.35 ±0.10 no matter what height it was dropped at. Results were slightly higher when the ball was dropped from a higher height and slightly lower at lower heights, but stayed within ±0.10 of the average value. This is most probably due to the greater force of friction from air resistance and surface type acting on the ball, converting the kinetic energy into heat and sound energy. Kinetic energy could also have been converted into elastic energy (energy to do with the disfiguration of volume or shape) upon impact. These forces have less of an impact when the ball is dropped from a lower height, as there is less displacement to travel through and therefore less air to resist. Friction from the ground should be constant as the ball only impacts for a very short period of time. Therefore this proves the hypothesis; that the same amount of energy is lost each time, to be true and reliable.

Hence, the linear, almost completely horizontal gradient (max, min and best) in graph 1 proves that fractional loss of kinetic energy stays consistent whether the initial drop height increases or decreases.

Evaluation:

Table 6: Table to show evaluation of uncertainties and errors in investigation (in order of significance)

Source of Uncertainty
Random/ Systematic
Possible Improvement
Extraction of h2 by Logger Pro video analysis – uncertainty of ‘set scale’ function is unknown and if the camera is not level but in fact at an angle. This is significant as it can affect the collection of correct h2, and therefore the experimental value of fractional loss of kinetic energy.
Random / parallax / systematic
Instead of, or along side video analysis, it would benefit to use a motion sensor to help plot a displacement vs. time graph. This could allow for more accurate collection of rebound height and therefore calculations for Ef and Ekf. This would also help confirm the values by having reproducible data.
Temperature – Trials for 0.20-0.60m were taken on a separate day from trials from 0.80-2.00m. Although room temperature was the same, the basketball was stored in a separate room prior to the trials and therefore could have been affected by different temperature or other environmental factors.
Random
Take all trials on the same day and make sure ball is stored at a constant environment prior to investigation. It would also benefit if temperature was further/more precisely controlled by cooling down / heating up the ball to a specific temperature after every trial.
Height, h1 (±0.02) – measured by observer dropping the ball. Due to the round spherical shape of the ball, it is difficult for the observer to very accurately position the basketball in the correct initial drop height. However, as the observer is doing this at eye level with the ball, it can be assumed that the error is small enough and can be considered negligible.
Systematic
If a flat surface with a clamp holding the ball (i.e, a machine much like the one in an arcade claw game) were to position and then let go of the ball at the correct drop height.
Mass, m
(±0.00001kg) – measured with an electronic scale (tarred before measurement) in g (±0.001g) and converted into kg by dividing by 1000. Error is small enough and can be considered negligible.
Systematic
Use more precise electric scale that measures to 4+ sig figs/ decimal places. Make sure calibration is set to zero.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This experiment was to use kinetics of projectile motion and free falling bodies to determine the distance a ball will travel after it hits a bounce plate. To determine this we had to use the equations x=(1/2)at2 and v=v0+at and derive an equation that will determine the distance the ball will travel based on the height of the bounce plate and the height of where the ball will be dropped above the bounce plate. The equation made was g*(sqrt(2)/sqrt(g))*(sqrt(H)*sqrt(h)). From here we can make an estimate of how far the ball will travel after it hits the bounce plate.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the ball is modeled by the graph below where t = time in seconds and h = height…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eggpolo 6 Research Paper

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kinetic energy is when the object, the egg in this case, is in motion. On the other hand potential energy is when the object, again the egg in this case, Potential energy is the stored energy of an object, such as gravitational potential energy which depends on the mass and the height the object is at. In the egg drop we were hoping that the Eggpollo 6 would absorb the energy of impact, which would transfer the energy away from the egg and cause the Eggpollo 6 to protect the egg from breaking. The straws helped absorb the impact by bending. The toothpicks helped absorb the impact by stopping the straws from bending too much stopping the Eggpollo 6 from compressing too much. If I could do the drop again I would make the project as bare as possible for the mass requirement. But not so bare that there is almost no protection. I would put an egg in a small chamber just big enough for the egg to fit in made of straws and toothpicks in the straws hot glued the openings on both side of the straws then at one end of the chamber put straws on the sides going out at as close you can get to a 45° angle. At the end of the straws put a box on it at hot glue it to the…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Practice Quiz

    • 5122 Words
    • 42 Pages

    1. 0.2 024 10.0 points You are on a rooftop and you throw one ball straight down and another straight up. The second ball, after rising, falls and also strikes the ground below. If air resistance can be neglected and if your downward and upward initial speeds are the same, how will the speed of the balls compare upon striking the ground?…

    • 5122 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For this experiment, we will measure the bounce height that results from dropping a ball. We will change the height from which it is dropped. We are testing the relationship of drop height and bounce height.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Figure 1: A motion diagram showing a ball’s locations every 1/15ths as it rolls horizontally and then falls vertically for about 1 meter.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doors

    • 304 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Note: As this is the first lab, you will have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the assignment for a higher grade in the Drop and Bounce Revisited lab.…

    • 304 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    lab bounce

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    You will consider two variables—drop height and bounce height—to try to determine how drop height affects bounce height. You probably understand that a higher drop height will result in a higher bounce height, but in this experiment, your objective is to find out how one affects the other. For example, is the bounce height equal to 100% of the drop height or 50% of the drop height? Does the relationship change at…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Me Like

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Consider the concepts of kinetic energy (KE) and gravitational potential energy (GPE) as you complete these questions. A ball is held 1.4 meters above the floor. Use the terms KE of GPE as your answers. A. When the ball is held motionless above the floor, the ball possesses only gravitational potential energy. B. If the ball is dropped, its gravitational potential energy decreases as it falls. C. If the ball is dropped, its kinetic energy increases as it falls. D. In fact, in the absence of air resistance, the amount of gravitational potential energy when the ball is held motionless above the floor equals the amount of kinetic energy at impact with the floor.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GCII Lab 1

    • 4059 Words
    • 22 Pages

    At the top of the hill, the ball possesses a large potential energy, which makes it less stable, but as the…

    • 4059 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Under Pressure: Ball Bouncing Dynamics by Sara Agee, Ph.D., on Science Buddies which is on the internet at: http://www.infoplease.com/cig/science-fair-projects/matter-much-air-basketball.html…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennis Point Lab Report

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To conduct our experiment, we used a meter stick on concrete and a tennis ball. We dropped the ball by intervals of ten from 40-100 centimeters above the concrete. To get the average ball-drop height, we dropped the ball three times from each height, found the mean. Our Y value represents the average bounce heights in centimeters and X represents the drop height in centimeters. We created a scatter plot to show our data (below).…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soccer has become an important part of the culture in America. Recently, the Women’s National Soccer team even won one of the biggest honors possible, the World Cup. People play and watch soccer games all of the time and yet few people actually realize the physics that are involved in almost everything that they see or do. While there are multiple ways that physics is used in a soccer game, this paper explores three parts and the physics that are involved in each one. The three parts that are going to be discussed are passing, heading, and throw-ins. These three can explain how physics can work from a soccer ball coming or going in each and every direction. Also, every part that is discussed uses different parts of the body. This can go to…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Using the measurements and given formulas calculate the amount of energy “lost” after the first 3 bounces…

    • 483 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a positive correlation between the height at which the tennis ball was dropped and the amount of energy that it held. This energy was measured through the amount of gravitational potential energy that the tennis ball had before it was dropped, and by the amount of work it had done when displacing the sand. As shown in Table 2, when the tennis ball was dropped at a height of 1 meter, it only possessed a potential energy of 0.569 J. When dropped from 5.5 meters, it held a potential energy of 3.217 J. This shows a positive correlation between the height of the drop and the amount of potential energy the tennis ball had. Also, shown in Graph 1’s trend line, is a positive correlation between the two variables. Table 2 shows the diameter…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays