Preview

Bourgeoisie Vs Proletariat Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bourgeoisie Vs Proletariat Essay
Marxist ideology is based on the idea of two distinct socio-economic classes—the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx defines the bourgeoisie as a wealthy and capitalistic class whose economic supremacy arises from and relies on owning the means of production and preserving capital. Contrarily, the proletariat is a class of wage laborers whose only power lies in their ability to sustain themselves through work, for they do not have access to the “instruments of production.” The bourgeoisie class is comprised of industrial millionaires who exploit the laboring proletariat masses to ensure the perpetuation of their dominance and status at the top of the hierarchy. According to Marx, societal conflict between the classes has always existed and the …show more content…
Marx provides a list of communist objectives that address many shortcomings of the industrial era and seek to evoke systematic change. One such solution he proposes is the abolition of bourgeoisie private property. Industrialization and urbanization caused a significant decrease in the number of landowners as the general population shifted from agricultural work in rural areas to factory work in cities. Since a system of wage labor produces capital rather than land for the laborer, the possession of land became limited to only the very wealthy. In this way, land ownership became an explicitly bourgeois feature of society and further emphasized the divide between the classes. As Marx states, “… modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.” Marx’s solution to this issue is to eliminate private property in favor of communal ownership of all resources and means of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, “Communist Manifesto,” Marx stresses the importance of communism or the publication of private property. As stated above, John Locke was the influencer of human basic rights, which included the right to own private property. The development of the Capitalist soon came after this right was made. Capitalists were key contributors to the rise of the industrial revolution but also to the fall of small shop owners. These shop owners were without income and the only way to provide a source was by working for these wealthy owners. A clear distinction between these two types people was their level of income and property which brought on the social classes. There was an oppressor and the oppressed. Before I go further with any explanations, this picture here of classes shows that only one class is progressing. The oppressor is the class that prospers in context of human progression through technological advancements. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other- bourgeoisie and proletariat (Marx 9).” The bourgeoisie were the capitalist while the proletariat was the lower working class. Separation between the two came along with the industrial revolution. Romanticist like Marx would oppose this as human progression because as a whole we aren’t all included in this promotion. It seems as the Capitalists are being set up on a pedestal…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proletariat or working class, is the second class in modern society formations, according to Marx. Deprived of the opportunity to produce their own livelihoods, they were forced to sell all they possess, their labor, in order to survive. According to Marx, the relationship between these classes both that they were dependent on each other and hostile to each other. Workers needed for the bourgeoisie to find them work, and the bourgeoisie needed workers for a profit. But the relationship was an inherent conflict because of the exploitative nature of these financial arrangements contained (Bradley, 2006: 135).…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This claim hinges on the assumption of the existence of two principal classes in society: (1) Bourgeoisie and (2) Proletariat, which have different and conflicting characteristics (Parkin, 1979). A class is defined as a group which shares a common interest, is aware of that fact, and undertakes collective action with the aim of advancing that interest (Andrew, 1983). As such, the bourgeoisie at first represented businessmen such as merchants, bankers and entrepreneurs who acted the role of financial intermediaries between feudal landlords and the peasants. However, with the invention of the steam machine and the onset of the Industrial Revolution and subsequently industrial capitalism, the bourgeoisie became the ruling class due to possessing both the means of production and the means of coercion. (Marx & Engels, 1848).…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of relocating power from one Bourgeoisie to another, Marx suggests total destruction of all Bourgeoisies’ economic power such as their private properties and industries. He believes that in order to eradicate the imbalanced social class, a communistic type of revolution is required. In addition idea of capitalism should also be abolished because that is the type of economic system that Bourgeoisies thrive on. This revolution will not only diminish the gap between the classes, but it will also upgrade the economic, social and political conditions of the…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a capitalist society, classes form from an individual’s relationship to the means of production. Marx and Engels believe that this relationship to commodity separates the rich from the poor. Thus, the bourgeoisie own…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx was a sociologist, economist, and author of “The Communist Manifesto,” which is still, to this day, the most famous piece of literature related to socialism written. His work laid the foundation for other leaders in communism such as Vladimir Lenin. One of the theories Karl Marx is most known for is Marxism; Marxism is, in short, a system of socialism where the prominent feature is the public ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. With capitalism, the public only own their ability to work, and then, in return, sell their own labor. Marx believes a class is defined by the relation of its members to the means of production, and that the struggle of the classes is embedded in history.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxism Vs Conservatism

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the first sentence of the first chapter of the his work titled the Communist Manifesto, he explains, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx CR 129). Hierarchies have existed in societies for centuries, and capitalism went along with it by establishing a divide between the haves and the have-nots. Owners have control over the means of production, meaning that they not only control factories and business, but economic resources and political power as well. Marx comments that the proletariat class suffers for the benefit of the bourgeois, saying, “Not only are they slaves the the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself” (Marx CR 132). This greatly affects the distribution of wealth as the bourgeois, who only represent one-tenth of the population see an increase in wealth, while the proletarian, nine-tenths of the population, see an increase in poverty.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx put tremendous faith in the working class in starting this revolution. The working class, or “bourgeoisie,” is those who own the majority of society’s wealth and basis of production. Marx’s concept helps to elucidate what he sees as the looming danger within capitalism. His argument is that the "weapons" used by the bourgeoisie was that of their need for material wealth and profit. The belief was that because of this profit hoarding desire, coupled with the institutional network of power that supports it, the progression of materialism eliminated feudalism and shepherded in the stage of capitalism. But Marx argued that this is not the final stage of growth and that capitalism will inevitably give way to an order where the Proletariat will assume control and deconstruct the power structures of capitalism. Consequently, as a result of this economic inevitability, which allowed the usurpation of feudal control to a capitalist order, the same fate will compromise capitalism and the emergent bourgeoisie. By viewing Marx as an anthropologist of sorts, it is evident that his theories are primarily concerned with social relations and how they ultimately paved the way for an economic revolution. Moreover, Marx was also concerned with the concept of “value” and the intrinsic power within laborers and how these are integral in determining the key elements of the working class.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism in Literature

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Many works of literature and even some films contain themes and evidence which supports Marx’s view of capitalism, as expressed in the Communist Manifesto. The Communist Manifesto includes many concepts relating to the continuous struggles between classes and their inevitable impact on history. The specific classes discussed in the Communist Manifesto are the proletariat and the bourgeois. The bourgeoisie has, throughout history, exploited the proletariat for reasons stemming from profit-motives. The bourgeoisie has contributed to the creation of the wage-laborer, division of labor, and the ever increasing de-skilling of labor. In its quest for more profit, the bourgeoisie brings together workers, uniting them, and therefore creating their own means of destruction.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx (1844) theory of social change derives from the views on class conflict, the theory emphasized on class connecting to the means of production due to the differences between members of society. This difference according to Marx causes the population to be divided into two groups, the ruling class and the working class. This however, makes conflict possible because the subjected class performs the productive labour and the wealth produced goes to the ruling class. The working class therefore, is powerless due to their lack of ownership of means of production (Ray, 1999). Marx argued that the significance of human existence was to ensure physical survival through creating the means of production in order to control nature. Subsequently, the inadequacy of individual’s necessities such as property and wealth could alter their progression in society. Marx emphasised that the way society organises its production was the most fundamental and important aspect of human existence and this is the initiator that develops other aspects of human activities (Bilton et al, 2002).…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s idea is useful to explain the proceeding historical process through the modes of production and characterized by class struggle. Besides, it is useful to explain the current phenomenon in Hong Kong which is the hostility towards the rich and class polarization. It is unavoidable and inescapable that the means to subsistence, from electricity to telecommunications, from real estate to retail, from shipping to the Internet, are closely related to…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx also believed that private property is something that only benefits the bourgeoisie. He says that the proletariat hardly owns any property to begin with, and what they believe they own, is really owned by the bourgeoisie anyway. An example would be someone who says they own their home, but in…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elitist Approach

    • 2150 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx asserted that the key to understanding human culture and history was the struggle between the classes. He used the term class to refer to a group of people within society who share the same social and economic status (Marx K. and Engels F. 1945). According to Marx, class struggles have occurred in every form of society, no matter what its economic structure, or mode of production: slavery, feudalism, or capitalism. In each of these kinds of societies, a minority of people own or control the means of production, such as land, raw materials, tools and machines, labour, and money. This minority constitutes the ruling class. The vast majority of people own and control very little. They mainly own their own capacity to work. The ruling class uses its economic power to exploit workers by appropriating their surplus labour. In other words, workers are compelled to labour not merely to meet their own needs but also those of the exploiting ruling class. As a result, workers become alienated from the fruits of their labour (Marx K. and Engels F. 1945).…

    • 2150 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays