Preview

Karl Marx: Saving The Working Man

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx: Saving The Working Man
of history, in away there will be no new history created. The victory of the proletariat and the birth of a classless society, therefore creates a Utopian end of history which is the goal of all previous historical events.
Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property
…show more content…
Communists are different from other socialist parties because their main focus lies solely on the common interests of all workers in general and not the sole interests of any kind of single national movement. They appreciate the forces of history that have pushed the progress of their class and has helped lead the proletariat to fulfill their destiny. As Marx says, "The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat" (95). What Marx offered the working man sounded like a dream to them. He offered them free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor. The idea of a parent’s children

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Communist Manifesto discusses the political objectives of communists on behalf of the proletariat class. The ultimate goal of the Communist Manifesto and communism is the overthrow of the bourgeois by the proletariat class and the removal of private property. “formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.” (Marx) Marx theorized that all revolutions were related to class struggle and the only way to remove the bourgeois class was the abolishment of private property. “…modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few. In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” (Marx) The abolishment of property is one of the most defining principles in communism it is, however not intrinsic to a communist revolution. “The French Revolution, for example, abolished feudal property in favour of bourgeois property.” (Marx) Marx theorized for a communist society to function properly a list of conditions was required.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was one of the most influential texts of the 19th century. In brief, it outlines how all of human development has been forms of class struggles, first with the feudal lord and peasant, and in later years the bourgeoisie and proletariat. According to Marx, the final stage of the development of society is rebellion of the working class. It is inevitable that the laborers will come to rule themselves and overthrow the capitalists. Capitalism is heavily attacked by Marx; he describes the system as exploitative, cruel, unjust, and therefore destined to be overthrown. Through the manifesto, Marx works to call the workers together to gain control of their future, as he believes they must.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The workers, who own no means of production of their own, must seek jobs in order to live. They get hired by a capitalist and work for him, producing some sort of goods or services. These goods or services then become the property of the capitalist, who sells them and gets a certain amount of money in exchange. One part of the wealth produced is used to pay the workers ' wages, while the other part (surplus value) is split between the capitalist 's private takings (profit), and the money used to pay rent, buy supplies and renew the forces of production. Thus, the wealth has been consumed reproductively for the capitalist and unproductively for the worker, because the value of the wealth he exchanged for the means and substitutes, and, therefore, lost it forever. The only way to get money for the worker is to repeat the exchange of his labour power to wage with capitalist. Therefore, according to Marx, “capital presupposes wage-labor; wage-labor presupposes capital. They condition each other; each brings the other into existence.” (Marx, 1849). A worker produces not only…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of mankind has been history of oppressor-oppressed and the class struggle between two major classes during Marx’s time, which were bourgeois and proletariat. Bourgeois, a class that monopolized a large mass of production, oppressed the working class, proletariat. According to The Communist Manifesto, private bourgeois property contributes greatly to inequality among different social classes. Marx supported communism, which he believed in the abolition of private bourgeois property and it was the only solution to end class struggle. With this solution, everyone eventually because proletariat. Freedom of individuals to acquire personal property is important to civil society. It builds competition among people and is one of the reasons why people work hard to be prosperous. This would also contribute to the economic growth. Without the right of personal property, everyone would depend on others and lack of motivation to improve themselves and the society as a whole. The one who works hard should deserve…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of Marxism came about in the mid-nineteenth century; Karl Marx and Fredrich En-gels had formed this ideology. However, throughout his life Marx’s thought process changed leaving his ideology open to many conflicting interpretations. Marxism is closely linked to that of communist views. One could even suggest that Marxism was indeed the catalyst which created such communist movements in the modern day. A core value of Marxism is that no person/s should be of greater significance or wealth than any other aiming for a sense of equality. There is no sense of hierarchy. Whereas, with Liberalism, there is a clear manifestation of class divisions. Which the following statement suggests, “For Marxist, the capitalist economy is based on two antagonistic social classes: one class, the Bourgeoisie, owns the means of production; the other class, the proletariat, owns only its labour power which it must sell to the bourgeoisie. So Labour puts in more work than it gets back pay; there is a surplus value appropriated by the bourgeoisie.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently the proletariats are operating independent of their will. The relations of production, ideas about the world and their place in it have already been determined by a superstructure put into place by the ruling class, the bourgeoisie. This superstructure determines the source of mental and material production, which also includes the way society should think and therefore act. Eventually according to Marx, the continued exploitation of the underclass will create great resentment and will lead the proletariat to start a revolution against the bourgeoisie and overthrow Capitalism. We have learned that action is independent, while thought is dependent upon the already existing conditions of the superstructure. Thus, the only way this issue will be resolved is when the proletariats unite against the bourgeoisie, and “rise to be the leading class of the nation…constitute itself the nation...” (STCE, 56). This will result in an end to capitalism and the start of socialism, a new classless society.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx - Essay

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx theorize that society is split into two classes the Bourgeoisie and Proletarians - the haves and the have not’s. “The Bourgeoisie is owners of the means of social production and employers of wage-labor, the middle class; the wealthy who made their money from the labor of the working class. The Bourgeoisie owned the land; the factories… and gained wealth through industrialization - they were the modern day Capitalists – during the Industrial Revolution. The Proletarians are modern wage laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor-power in order to live” (pg.180).…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Capitalism

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this paper I will examine how Karl Marx views capitalism and, more specifically, the criticisms he has regarding capitalism. In the first part of the paper I will reconstruct and explain the philosopher’s argument. In the second part of the paper I will offer my critical evaluation where I will demonstrate how these critiques are still appropriate in today’s society by providing examples of how capitalism is affecting the lives of American workers even today. However, I will first explain the definition and structure of capitalism.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Labour Theory

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The labour theory of value can be traced back to writings in 1662, Treatise of Taxes written by Sir William Petty. However it seems to be Karl Marx who has expanded these ideas and made it a well-known theory. Marx argues that labour equals power (<http//enwikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_theory_of_value>, March 2012). A commodity gains its value from labour power. This value is the ‘socially necessary labour time needed to produce it’. The value on top of this is known as ‘surplus value’ also known as the capitalist’s profit (Marx, 1906).…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Marx’s view, the working class proletariat, which is property-less in the sense that it owns only its labor, is exploited by the wealthy capitalist bourgeoisie class - the owners of the means of production. This class division leads to an inevitable social revolution through the struggle for the control of production. As outlined in Marx’s Communist Manifesto, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” and, like Ricardo, Marx’s class conflict theories are linked to the control of the “distribution and produce of the earth.” This is referred to as his “economic interpretation of history” in which Marx asserts the hypothesis that “human history is the product of economic forces that determine the character of the other aspects of human experience.” Not so apparent, however, are the specific economic agents that control the material well-being, psychological development and…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over 150 years after they were first coined, The Labour Theory of Value, Class Antagonisms and the Means of Production are all terms which are central to the revolutionary ideals of Karl Marx and are still widely used and referred to in contemporary political thought. However, when considering how one can assess the Marxist paradigm on history and politics, there must be an understanding of the circumstances in which Karl Marx, one of the greatest political thinkers of the 19th century, was faced with. As many great political thinkers before and after him, Marx’s political ideology was partly shaped by his experiences, and is arguably the framework behind the inception of some of his greatest works such as the Communist Manifesto of 1848. Marx was born in Prussia at a time when a dynastic monarchy still maintained their rule and social woes were aggravated by the shift from Feudalism to an ever increasing Industrial society. As Marx continually moved from country to country, he began to develop dialectic political perspective and, after joining the Young Hegelians and becoming a political thinker, he began to write from a Hegelian viewpoint. His belief was that the method of thesis, antithesis and synthesis was to be best utilised when studying history, politics and the conditions of mankind in order to understand social stratification and emerging capitalism in the economic system. He also believed this method would create a concrete framework for society to follow in order to change the long standing socio-economic conditions of the past. As Marx himself claimed “The Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it” Marx differed from many prolific philosophers before him as his theories centred on Materialism and the relationship between the forces and means of production, as opposed to what Marx dismissed as “theories based in…

    • 2593 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx

    • 80248 Words
    • 321 Pages

    Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk Introduction 1 The Theory of Value and Surplus Value IT The Theory of the Average Rate of Profit and of the Price of Production in The Question of the Contradiction iv The Error in the Marxian System: Its Origin and Ramifications v Werner Sombart's Apology…

    • 80248 Words
    • 321 Pages
    Good Essays