Preview

Karl Marx Labour Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx Labour Theory
The labour theory of value can be traced back to writings in 1662, Treatise of Taxes written by Sir William Petty. However it seems to be Karl Marx who has expanded these ideas and made it a well-known theory. Marx argues that labour equals power (<http//enwikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_theory_of_value>, March 2012). A commodity gains its value from labour power. This value is the ‘socially necessary labour time needed to produce it’. The value on top of this is known as ‘surplus value’ also known as the capitalist’s profit (Marx, 1906).

A commodity is something that has value and can be exchanged for another commodity. Marx’s theory suggests that a commodity gains it’s value through labour power. For example, water in a lake, which is free and available for all to get, is not a commodity. If the lake dries up and a man goes and digs a spring for himself, this water then becomes a commodity. The labour value added to the water is the manual labour of digging. This water now has a value and can be exchanged for another commodity such as bread. The value of a commodity is the ‘socially necessary labour time needed to produce it’. This is the quantity of labour required by an average skilled worker to complete a task. If this concept wasn’t considered then it could be perceived that a product produced by a lazy unskilled worker would have a higher value (Strickland, 2007). This then leads us onto surplus value.

Marx’s describes the surplus value as ‘unpaid labour time’ (Marx, 1906). This is the capitalist profit and occurs due to exploitation. Surplus value is ‘the value of commodities (measured in labour time) minus the amount of labour time needed to reproduce the means of subsistence for the workers’ (Marx, 1906) .The wage paid to a sufficiently productive labourer does not reflect the value of the commodity they are producing (<http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_value>, March 2012). In Marx’s theory the rate of profit is equal to constant capital



References: Marx, K 1906, in eds.Samual Moore &amp; Edward Avelin, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. I. The Process of Capitalist Production, 2nd edn, Charles H. Kerr and Co., Chicago. Strickland, R 2007, Cultural Theory: The Labour Theory of Value, You Tube, viewed 8 March 2012, &lt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFDVb5x-npk&gt;. Labour theory of value, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia n.d., viewed 8 March 2012, &lt;http//enwikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_theory_of_value&gt;. Surplus Value, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia n.d., viewed 8 March 2012, &lt;http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_value&gt;.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    To boldly claim that as capital grows, wages shrink as Marx did we need to understand the interconnectedness of capitalisms five major aspects. They are capital, labor power, wages, division of labor, and the use of machinery and technology. Each piece could be analyzed in-depth for a greater understanding of the whole system, but only the last three play a role in this argument. The idea of a wage is the first step to grasping the logical argument made by Marx.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    to be confused with the labor theory of value which suggests that the more work put into…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx is the first to state that capitalism is based on the accumulation and hyper-consumption of commodities. As such, commodities are meaningful both because of their monetary/exchange value and because they reflect the social relations of production that went into making them. In The Fetishism of the Commodity, Marx says that the inherent problem with the capitalist structure is that society tends to focus only on the monetary and exchange value of the commodity. Marx uses the word “fetish” to describe commodities and show how they cause society to fixate on their monetary and exchange values, while ignoring the exploitative nature of the market that produced them. To illustrate his point, Marx uses the example of wood used by a worker to create a table. “The form of wood, for instance, is altered, by making a table out of it. Yet, for all that, the table continues to be that common, every-day thing, wood” (1). While a commodity, in this case a table, is only valuable because of the labor used to make it, it is difficult to place a specific monetary value on labor quality, so capitalist society treats commodities as if they has intrinsic value. The value of the labor is…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed the factory system had resulted in a “cash economy”. Owning the means of production, the bourgeoisie kept wages low in order to get cheap supplies, improve the technology of their factories and increase their markets. According to Marx, dependency on low wages had reduced factory workers to “wage slaves,” deprived them of the satisfaction that should be found from working and made it more difficult for the lower class to provide for their basic needs. He wrote, “The work of the proletarians has lost all individual character…and all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine.” (Paragraph 22)…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commodity Fetishism

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his works, Carl Marx distinguishes the user-value of commodities from their exchange-value. The user value is the use that the commodity has to the labourer or the creator of the product whereas the exchange value is the use the commodity has to the fetishized value that they have as commodities.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx, K. (1967), Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production: The Process of Capitalist Production (New World Paperbacks). International Publishers Co.…

    • 2607 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Marx, Karl. 1971. Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Tr. S. W. Ryanzanskaya, edited by M. Dobb. London: Lawrence & Whishart.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx illustrates how the working class in society is alienated, under the system of private property, in several ways such from the product of their labor, the work itself, from species-being, and from each other. This private property the workers work on is owned by a minute portion of the population who, in exchange for mass production of their product, put their employees through unfair labor conditions. This leads Marx to believe that a human being puts all of his life into working on a product, while working for a capitalist system, but never gets to use it hence, becoming alienated from the product and important parts of life. In essence, the worker will also become alienated in distinct ways. In the following paragraphs, Marx views on working…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Economic theories simplify the relations among key economic concepts and enable us to understand different economic concepts. Throughout history, different economists in different time periods have formed diverse thoughts on how markets work by building and improving on the work of those who came before them. Therefore in order to gain a wider understanding of a particular economic term, it is helpful for us to investigate more than one economic theory. This essay will explore classical and Marxist and compare their portrayal of the concept of profit and where is it from. While classical economists believe profit has a large role to play in land and rent, Marxist economists put more emphasis on surplus value gained through the exploitation of workers’ labour.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx commences his essay by maintaining that workers' miseries are directly proportional to their level of production; the more value workers attribute to their product, by virtue of their labor, the more miserable they become. Workers themselves are a commodity and the greater the value of their production, the cheaper a commodity they become. "The increase in the value of the world of things is directly proportional to the decrease in value of the human world." The end result of labor is its objectification into a thing, and the value of labor lies only in its objectification.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays