Brain Imaging Issues

Current Issues in Brain Imaging Technology Brain imaging technology has revolutionized the way doctors, scientists, and researchers are able to see the workings of this highly complex organ. The use of brain imaging techniques allows for discovery without the use of invasive surgical procedures. Now used throughout the globe, these techniques have matured dramatically in the last century. With its roots in the early twentieth century using low-tech devices, brain imaging has evolved dramatically to provide images and records that are increasingly sophisticated and detailed. Current technologies include fMRI, PET scans, CT scans, MEG and EEG. These technologies have advanced to investigate thoughts, diagnose illness, understand cognitive
As imaging becomes more sophisticated, researchers have found methods of predicting future behavior. This information could potentially be used to prohibit a prisoner from receiving parole. If a medical profession could with some certainly discern the actions of a criminal, courts may one day take these result into consideration. However, how ethical is it to base treatment of an individual on something they might do in the future? The implications of such a question are grave. While some may argue that the legal system currently considers the likelihood of criminal to commit another criminal act in the future, a brain scan may provide evidence that could solidify their incarceration. With growing confidence that certain personality factors lead to repeat criminal behavior, the ethics of the use of technology to predict this are questionable (Farah and Wolpe, 2004). Leaders in the court system must weigh the reliability of information and ensure that they are utilizing solid results. In the event that unreliable information is used, their credibility may be
While there have been no reported cases of forced brain imaging, could this be around the corner? Their interest in the technology may suggest that they seek to utilize this in the future. What is the rationale behind this research and outpouring of money? There is a group online that has already implicated the government of monitoring the thoughts of some individuals. While this may seem unlikely, it is something that current technologies could allow for. There is potential in the future for government to mandate brain scanning in court cases, for criminals in prison, or even for eliminating suspects. As deception detection develops further, the privacy of an individual’s brain comes into play. There is little legislation in place to protect an individual if a brain scan were required by a government entity. The legal system has not progressed with the movement of the technology. While computerized records are subject to privacy legislation, studies suggest that many patients are concerned that these types of records will have a negative effect on privacy. Without specific protections in place, will brain scans be subject to a lower degree of