Preview

British Parliament Supremacy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
British Parliament Supremacy
Sovereignty: The House of Lords and The House of Commons! British Parliament alone possesses legislative supremacy and thereby ultimate power over all other political bodies in the United Kingdom and its territories. ?The British Parliament, in its famed Longitude Act of 1714, set the highest bounty of all, naming a prize equal to a king?s ransom (several million dollars in today?s currency) for a ?Practicable and Useful? means of determining longitude,? Davy Sobel. The history of British Parliament surpassed several milestones that have influenced the modern practice of government.
Under a monarchical system of government, the monarch usually must consult and seek a measure of acceptance for his policies if he is to enjoy
…show more content…
5. c. 13) asserted the supremacy of the House of Commons by limiting the legislation-blocking powers of the House of Lords (the suspensory veto). Provided the provisions of the Act are met, legislation can be passed without the approval of the House of Lords. Additionally, the 1911 Act amended the Septennial Act 1716 to reduce the maximum life of a Parliament from seven years to five years. The Parliament Act 1911 was amended by the Parliament Act 1949 (12, 13 & 14 Geo. 6. c. 103), which further limited the power of the Lords by reducing the time that they could delay bills, from two years to …show more content…
Originally there was no fixed limit on the length of a Parliament, but the Triennial Act 1694 set the maximum duration at three years. As the frequent elections were deemed inconvenient, the Septennial Act 1715 extended the maximum to seven years, but the Parliament Act 1911 reduced it to five. During the Second World War, the term was temporarily extended to ten years by Acts of Parliament. Since the end of the war the maximum has remained five years. Modern Parliaments, however, rarely continued for the maximum duration; normally, they were dissolved earlier. For instance, the 52nd, which assembled in 1997, was dissolved after four years. The Septennial Act was repealed by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    They wasnted the Lords to never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. Therefore in 1990 they drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away the power to veto. Reform of the Lords was vital as the Conservatives were strongly opposed to Home Rule for Ireland, and would vote against any Home Rule Bill in the Lords. This was necessary as the Liberals had promised Home Rule to the Irish Nationalists, in return for their support, so reform of the Lords had to take place before Home Rule could be brought in. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have the power to amend or reject those bills the speaker of the Commons certifies to be true money Bills. The Lords veto was abolished, but could delay it for no longer than two years. Also the maximum period between general elections was to be reduced from seven years to five to make parliament more accountable to electors. Although the Bill was not as radical as it could have been because it did not alter the composition of the Lord. The Bill would easily pass through the House of Commons but to curb the Lords’ power would have to be passed by the Lords themselves. Asquith planned to ask King Edward Vll to create 570 new peers, who would be willing to outvote the Conservative Lords and therefore ensure the parliament bill…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The parliament got King William and Queen mary to sign a bill of rights that made parliament more powerful than the king and queen.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH FRE

    • 618 Words
    • 1 Page

    British Parliament could now pass binding laws on the colonies “in all cases whatsoever,” which…

    • 618 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nullification of Laws (“Royal Veto”) - The British crown also reserved the right to nullify any legislation passed by the colonial assemblies if such laws worked mischief with the mercantilist system.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    W100 Tma02

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Legislation is the making of a law, it starts off as a bill and if approved by the house of laws and the House of Lords it will then become an act of parliament.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modernization is one of the key ways in which the British constitution has been reformed since 1997. Under this falls the House of Lords reform. This reform entailed the 600 hereditary peers of the House of Lords being cut to just 92, allowing the second chamber to be much more democratic. However this is the only part of the reform which has taken place over the last 13 years, and there has been no reform for a fully elected second house – something that would be extremely beneficial to British politics. Until an elected House of Lords is achieved, the second chamber is not democratically legitimate, as the people or representative does not appoint it. Due to this, many consider the House of Lords extremely unaccountable and a massive flaw in Parliament. However, the creation of the Supreme Court means that the House of Lords is no longer the highest court of appeal, meaning that the currently unelected House of Lords is not as much of a problem. A way in which modernization has been effective is in reforms to the way the House of Commons is run; the increase in use of Westminster Hall for debates, the publication of bills two weeks in advance to increase scrutiny and the changes to Prime Minister’s Question Time. The latter reforms have in fact strengthened the UK constitution, in contrast to the reform to the House of Lords, which was essentially ineffective.…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second way is that a lot of acts which are created in Westminster Parliament are passed because of government members majority and therefore coalition government members which also vote in parliament have the majority sits in parliament and therefore can affect acts and laws which can be passed. So parliament has lost sovereignty because government can affect parliament and they are not separate (like in USA where they have Congress and government and they are not bind together in any way) whereas in our system government is bind with parliament. A good example of coalition government affecting act passing in parliament are 37 acts, which has been passed because of majority of government members in parliament.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are several important functions that Parliament must perform. The word Parliament derived from the Latin ‘parliamentum’ and the French word ‘parler’ which originally meant a talk- which is what Parliament does most of the time. Parliament consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Monarchy. Parliament is the highest judicial, legislative and executive body in Britain. A parliamentary form of government acknowledges that it derives its power directly from the consent of the people. This sort of system ensures democracy and an active interaction between the people and their representatives. The three functions that I am going to focus on are Scrutiny, Representation and Law Making.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The House of Commons is the publicly elected chamber of parliament, it is made up of 659 MP’s, all of whom are elected within a constituency throughout the UK. With the rare exception, such as Martin Bell in 1997, almost all MP’s are elected from a political party. Members in the House of Commons debate the major political issues of the day and make proposals for new laws. The House of Commons holds legislative functions, and is also used to hold the executive to account. It could be argued that the House of Commons is very effective in carrying out it’s functions due to the introduction, and then reform, of the select committees, the regular questioning of ministers, the fact that they have, although it is a rarity, voted against parliament and the growth in use of social media has helped MP’s to become more in contact with their constituencies. Others may claim that the House of Commons is not effective as there is only limited power to challenge the prerogative powers exercised by the Prime Minister and other government ministers, the fusion of the executive and legislative branch combined with the extensive use of party whips makes it difficult for the backbenchers to challenge the government.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Parliamentary sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. It may seem to be the, as part of the UK constitution continues to rely on extremely early Acts such as The Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights Act , however, these statutes continue to remain as they set out important constitutional principles. Even since 1215, it has been recognised that it is important to limit the power of the monarch, and transfer powers to parliament, in interest of balance, and the separation of powers. Up until present day, supporting Dicey’s summary above, UK courts cannot strike down an Act of Parliament, this is unlike many Supreme Courts in other countries, for example the USA, who are bound to reject legislation which contradicts the written constitutional rights. For example in the case of Mortensen v. Peters , it notes that in the event of a contradiction between international…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To that extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions?…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Constitution has one weakness that is the Legislative branch. The Legislative branch does not have term limits for its Congress members. The U.S.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays