Preview

Broken Link In The Torture Chain Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
945 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Broken Link In The Torture Chain Analysis
The Potential Broken Link in the Torture Chain
An American political theorist, Michael Walzer wrote that “just like strategy, generals must understand morality, they must understand cruelty and take actions to avoid it.” While sound military strategy, following the September 11th attacks, successfully expelled Al-Qaeda from Afghanistan and removed the Taliban from power, failures in morality continue to hamper the global effort to eradicate terrorism. The torture of suspected terrorists at Abu Graib and Guantanamo Bay represents the most significant failure of the Jus En Bello, or the just means of war, since the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, in 1968. And similar to the My Lai Massacre, the enhanced interrogation program fueled an ever growing
…show more content…
Constitution undeniably guarantees the right of Habeas Corpus and every U.S. service member swears an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. Article 1 is not where the legal conversation ends as The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention against Torture, the Uniformed Code of Military Justice and most specifically the Geneva Conventions all directly forbid the use of torture for any reason. Allowing a 34 year old lawyer to manipulate the law and steer the greatest military power into cruel and inhumane practices is an embarrassment at best and more accurately described as negligence of …show more content…
It would be naïve to believe that the nearly 1.5 million servicemen and women move in unison to the newest official or unofficial DOD policy. This is particularly true when it relates to conduct in war. The effectiveness in which senior officers control the culture of their unit more directly affects how their subordinates conduct themselves in battle or interrogations. Thus, it was not only the words of policy makers that allowed systematic torture in Iraq, Afghanistan or Cuba. Instead, it resulted from the commander who subtly looked the other way while interrogations escalated into torture. Or from someone who wanted revenge for 9/11 and found it in the interrogation room. Finally, it occurred because someone gave the order to “Gitmoize” Abu Graib. These are the links of the torture chain where senior officers could have taken control. This is where military professionals failed.
As professional military officers, we have the duty to uphold the highest standards of the Jus In Bello and sometimes that may be necessary in spite of policy makers in Washington. This responsibility resides with us because unlike those policy makers, we devote our lives to the protection and often times the taking of lives. Ethical leaders understand the enormity of this responsibility with which they are trusted. The taking of human life, more than any other action, injects a tangible sense of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower demonstrated sound moral judgment in choosing to deal with the Vichy French leader Admiral Darlan. Eisenhower encounters ethical challenges when he endorse Admiral Jean-Francois Darlan being appointed civil and military Chief of French North Africa, whereby he considered saving lives as one of his key objective in his decision. Colonel Don M. Snider identifies 7 ethical principles that all Army professionals must exemplify according to the Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP). For the purposes of this paper, three of these principles are examined as it relates to Eisenhower’s leadership: Loyalty, Duty, and…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with “Tortures Terrible Toll” article that we should not treat any person even prisoners with torture. Not only as mentioned in the essay that torture might not be effective, but also the inhumane and degrading treatment of torture will reflect the country’s moral standing. I agree with the idea mentioned in the article that all people are created equal with inalienable rights. But some people think that we have to revenge from terrorists by torture. I am not against loss of any terrorist’s life, but I am caring about the way they treated. Children who watch any torture scenes might grew up showing huge violence. No doubt, countries that use torture even to terrorists will be affected in their children. Of course to defeat prisoners…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, a series of pictures broadcast on CBV “60 Minutes II” prompted an worldwide media frenzy that challenged America’s so-called moral superiority, complicated the fight against terror in the Middle East, crippled U.S. relations with the international community and elicited public demands for high-level accountability. The physical, psychological and sexual abuse, including torture, rape, sodomy and homicide of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq unveiled a sobering hypocrisy when juxtaposed with the American enemy, Saddam Hussein, and the abuses he authorized at the very same prison. The powerful photos were irrefutable evidence…

    • 3365 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case For Torture

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first reason I agree with Michael Levin’s theory that torture is sometimes vindicated is because morals demand it. Torture may help to save lives. If the use of an unpleasant method will save more lives, it is foolish to not save those lives. Levin offers the example of a situation involving a bomb going off in a certain amount of time that would risk the lives of millions. If authorities refuse to take extreme measures such as torture to gain information necessary to save lives, they are failing to deliver the moral duty of protecting…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Case for Torture

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Levin's argument is one hundred percent justifiable. Protection of the "rights" of many is always more important than the "rights" of the few. Torture is only permissible in cases where many lives are in jeopardy and there is no other choice. Torture is not tolerable when used as a means of punishment or when used just to seek revenge for past discretions. Taking revenge is a personal action, not something benefitting anyone else. For the sake of saving innocent lives, torture should be legalized. If…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torturing cannot go on; the pros do not outweigh the cons of torture. In exceptional circumstances, lives may be saved, but at what cost? Where does it end, as stated in the article, will family members become torture victims? As the initial suspect may not have value for their own life, they turn to his/her loved ones? If a suspect has been detained, regardless of what their crime may be, they still have the right to remain silent. Any forced extraction of information goes against the fundamental human rights, and even if information is gained, what assurance do we have that it will be correct information? In the heat of the moment, it may seem that the information is true, to end the pain that the victim is in, yet it may all be fiction. These are clearly not risks worth taking, and in my opinion, anyone who is willing to submit a fellow human being to that amount of pain and discomfort, does not fill me with confidence in the fact that they are in a position of power.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does Torture Work?

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Taxi to the Dark Side (Alex Gibney 2007) accuse of what was going on behind the curtain in Abu Ghraib. Dilawar, the innocent taxi driver who took 3 passengers for a taxi ride, has been under detention with harsh torture under the purpose of getting information, and died. The military police Thomas Curtis, who was at Bagram says, “My memory of Dilawar was chained up with the hooded up and no sleeping.”. This is obviously the opposite way what Geneva Convention set up as a goal. However, the American president Bush rose up the question that whether the suspected terrorist should be protected by laws like Geneva Convention. And the government gave the legal cover for certain organizations allowing torture which previously forbidden. However, does torture really work? Despite all those risky issues around the world, does torture is really the one of the most effective ways getting information from detainees? I’ll show you that torture is definitely not the effective way to get information.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From years, war has been present in every time of human life. The difference that exist between cultures, words, or something as simple as a facial expression has unleashed endless conflicts. Usually, the actions perpetrated by an individual, group or organization against humanity generate uncertainty in our society and violent acts to establish justice. Some cases such as the Prison in Guantanamo where many terrorists were sadistic torture to get information and dismantle this group that committed many crimes against society. The Bush administration used torture as an interrogation tactic. Despite President Bush negated the accusation of this immoral interrogation, former vice president Cheney affirmed the use of torture was a legal, essential,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Defense of Torture

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page

    The essay “In Defense of Torture”, Sam Harris argues about the torturing of terrorists. Starting his essay, he provides a realistic perspective, giving real life examples in which the reader agrees with the concept of torture. Harris's perspective goes as far as saying “picture your little seven-year-old daughter being slowly asphyxiated in a warehouse just five minutes away...” this perspective Harris puts onto the reader is quite scary. In the further evolution of his argument Harris reveals his grandfather was an active participant in the Second World War as a pilot, and in war, dropped bombs over thousands of innocent people, which resulted in collateral damage. Harris states that torturing should only be used as getting the truth out of an individual and that collateral damage should not be.…

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is Torture Ethical

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When they enter society they surrender only such rights as are necessary for their security and for the common good. Each individual retains fundamental prerogatives drawn from natural law relating to the integrity of person and property (natural rights).Every prisoner, May it be terrorist or not, do also has his rights and liberties like every normal citizens have. A prisoner has the right to be fair trial, not treated as animals, and also right to eat meals. They should not be punished in customs that not according to the law, as law is said to be the protector of our life and liberty. In this regard torture is regarded as the greatest violation of human dignity of the victim and greatest possible debasement of the perpetrator. From moral and philosophical point of view, therefore, torture is unconditionally…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justification Of Torture

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After having conducted numerous interrogations of his own, former veteran of the US Air Force, Matthew Alexander, came to the realization that more members were willing to cooperate with troops when they peacefully approached them while torturing them only did the reverse effect (34). Furthermore, a history professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Alfred W. McCoy, states in regards to bureau agent, Dan Coleman, that if a tortured man is “...going to be ashamed and humiliated... He’ll tell you anything you want to hear to get his clothes back. There’s no value in it” (qtd in McCoy). In the article of David Rose who is a contributing editor for Vanity Fair, he discussed the impact of seeing Abu Zubaydah tortured influenced F.B.I’s assistant for counterterrorism, Pasquale D'Amuro, to persuade director Robert Mueller to discontinue the bureau’s role in future C.I.A. interrogations in which use harsh and extreme techniques to extract information (47). After speaking with officials from both sides of Atlantic counterterrorist agencies , Rose discovered that “...coercive methods failed to generate significant and actionable intelligence, [and] have also caused the squandering of resources on a massive scale through ...[improbable] plots, and unnecessary safety alerts”(43). Evidently,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis Of Torture

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some of these torture tactics were seen as cruel or inhuman treatment as stated by the authors in the article by Cornell University School of Law, which states that “the act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering other than, pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions, including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control” (Cornell University Law School, 2013). If this definition is seen as being okay during trying times then torture would be considered as cruel or inhuman treatment as per this definition. If this is true then we as American citizens also played a part in this decision, because we went along with the torture tactics that our nation’s military personnel inflicted on those that were captured during war or terroristic investigations. Nevertheless, these events have made some people think that torture was accepted as a national security counterterrorist initiative for the sake of defending our countries democracy. Alan Dershowitz a famous lawyer from the Harvard Law School reveals these ideas about torture when he submits in the book “Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice, 2e” that…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torture In Prisons

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Torture is defined as the action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or to force them to do or say something. The Central Intelligence Agency put in place “advanced interrogation techniques” under the Bush Administration after the occurrence of 9/11. These techniques can easily be viewed as a form of torture. A citizen of the United States often agrees with the CIA’s interrogation techniques, however, one is often under assumption that the CIA has the right detainee in prison, the detainee has the vital information to give regarding terrorist plots, and that the interrogation is under strict regulation and not out of control. This is not the case. In reality, innocent people are tortured, the information gained are lies, and…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality of Torture

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The moral issue of torture is one that has come under scrutiny by many national and international organizations as of late. To talk about torture one must really understand what torture is. As taken from Dictionary.com "1.a. Infliction or severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion. b. An instrument or a method for inflicting such pain. 2. Excruciating physical or mental pain; agony. 3. Something causing severe pain or anguish." This is just the literal meaning of the word but doesn't entail the great horror that usually accompanies torture. As stated in the "Ticking Bomb" example given on the instruction sheets, "The interrogation won't be pretty, and the prisoner may never recover. Shall we do whatever is necessary?" On what moral level is bringing a human being to humiliation, unbearable physical and mental abuse, and most of the time an ultimate end ever an acceptable practice? Torture should be as unthinkable as slavery. In principle it is: since World War II, governments the world over have agreed to ban torture without exception, even when at war or facing acts of terrorism. International treaties banning torture and other, inhuman, and degrading practices are among the most widely ratified treaties in existence. It is not just the United States that endorses these practices; it is over 150 counties according to the United Nations expert on torture Theo van Boven. Since the United States has gone to "war on terror" in Afghanistan, the president and other top officials seem to think that we are not actually "at war" rather these detainees are outside the realm of prisoners of war (POW) status and they don't have rights under the Geneva Conventions. Now governments are returning alleged terrorists or national security suspects to countries where they are at risk of torture or ill treatment. This is just a reminder as to why the U.S. did not join the International Criminal Court because they have the "bad man" mindset knowing that they will or…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course, even after all that has been learned about torture and its impact on human lives and our reputation around the world, there are still those proponents of torture who claim it to be an effective means of obtaining information. In 2014, just three years ago, the psychologist and architect of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program, James Mitchell, gave an in-depth interview with the Guardian Newspaper, breaking a seven-year long silence on the issue. Mitchell took exception to a newly released committe report that “found that the interrogation techniques devised by Mitchell. . . were far more brutal than disclosed at the time, and did not yield useful intelligence. These included waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation for days at a time, confinement in a box and being slammed into walls”(Leopold). Mitchell…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays