Preview

Does Torture Work?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Torture Work?
Yunji Kim
English 102
Professor Harkness
10/24/12
RE 1 Revised
Does Torture Work?: Is it really one effective way?

Taxi to the Dark Side (Alex Gibney 2007) accuse of what was going on behind the curtain in Abu Ghraib. Dilawar, the innocent taxi driver who took 3 passengers for a taxi ride, has been under detention with harsh torture under the purpose of getting information, and died. The military police Thomas Curtis, who was at Bagram says, “My memory of Dilawar was chained up with the hooded up and no sleeping.”. This is obviously the opposite way what Geneva Convention set up as a goal. However, the American president Bush rose up the question that whether the suspected terrorist should be protected by laws like Geneva Convention. And the government gave the legal cover for certain organizations allowing torture which previously forbidden. However, does torture really work? Despite all those risky issues around the world, does torture is really the one of the most effective ways getting information from detainees? I’ll show you that torture is definitely not the effective way to get information.
First, torture does not ensure us that the confession from suspects is reliable. However, does information which was from the detainees who had gotten tortured really reliable? Tony Lagourains, the military interrogator who put into the Iraq war for interrogating suspects says, “It is very difficult to get confession if there is barely evidence on the suspected guy. So you start using harsher and harsher techniques to get the confession.” Imagine that you are under detention, surrounded what you feel fearful all around and got tortured. It is quite obvious you will say anything regardless of what is true, just for stopping all the pain and fearful feeling. There are some cases has been reported that people forced to confess, suffered from physical interrogation. In the early 20th century, police believed that they need some physical interrogation was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Naomi Klein’s article, “Torture’s Dirty Secret: It Works” from the May 30, 2005 asserts that torture is a tool that has been used for a long time by investigative personnel to extract important information from detainees. Naomi Klein describes the effects of torture on its victims by including a victim’s ordeal in her article. One of the victims of torture that Naomi Klein includes in her argument is a Syrian-born Canadian known as Maher Arar. Maher Arar is the world’s most famous victim of rendition by US officials. He was detained by US investigators at an airport in New York and then rendered to Syria. Arar was held in a tiny cell in Syria for ten months. While in detention, he was periodically taken out for beatings. The evidence that was…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Getting your teeth pulled and fingers snapped for not letting the enemy know where the rest of your brigade is hiding, is a common torture tactic. In most cases you just want the pain to stop, so you give false information. This is why I feel ,no, torture should not be a tactic to retrieve information and should be abolished in this country. In the essay The Torture Myth written by Anne Applebaum, torture is discussed and evaluated by the writer. Applebaum focuses on whether torture is a good vice to gain information from a person and it is insinuated that she does not, based on her arguments in the essay. I too believe torture is not a humane nor moral way to obtain truthful information.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Tactics

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper will explore the legally approved torture tactics approved by the Bush administration in Guantanamo Bay, to the dismantlement of the prison and court-bound procedures taken by the Obama administration.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated bibliography

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Very brief summary: The article ‘Using torture is illegal and never justified’ argues against torture by mainly focusing on the fact that the information gained from torture is highly unreliable because the prisoner could be lying to get the torture to stop. Who makes the decisions is also called into question.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay About Torture

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If someone is being tortured against their will, won’t they simply say anything in order to make the pain stop? A victim might provide false information just so that he or she does not have to continue undergoing the agonizing torment. Also, between not eating and not sleeping, some people become delusional and may not necessarily be able to discriminate between the truth and a lie. Furthermore, by investigators asking leading questions the person being tortured may start to believe the stories he or she is hearing and give the investigators faulty information. Although torture might be rational, there are many opportunities for the torturer to say false information due to the…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Use Of Torture

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    None of these studies except Hanns Scharff`s have not been studied why we need to torture and not just have a conservation with trickery and deceitfulness instead of torturing people that may or may not have anything to do with what is happening between countries and have no information about the topic in hand therefore will be tortured until death because of the lack of information that they have.Most people are just pons playing in a king's battle that have no information even if they joined their…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering terrorist attacks that harm or potentially kill at least thousand(s) of people, torture may seem justifiable. Torture, defined in these instances as physically non-lethal, has been generally used to extract information from terrorists that may lead to the prevention of massive terrorist attack.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting Away with Torture

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages

    undermined one of the most basic global standards governing how governments can treat people under their control. Contrary to the efforts of…

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torturing cannot go on; the pros do not outweigh the cons of torture. In exceptional circumstances, lives may be saved, but at what cost? Where does it end, as stated in the article, will family members become torture victims? As the initial suspect may not have value for their own life, they turn to his/her loved ones? If a suspect has been detained, regardless of what their crime may be, they still have the right to remain silent. Any forced extraction of information goes against the fundamental human rights, and even if information is gained, what assurance do we have that it will be correct information? In the heat of the moment, it may seem that the information is true, to end the pain that the victim is in, yet it may all be fiction. These are clearly not risks worth taking, and in my opinion, anyone who is willing to submit a fellow human being to that amount of pain and discomfort, does not fill me with confidence in the fact that they are in a position of power.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now imagine if you were being physically or psychologically broken down; could you withstand from disclosing information? I highly doubt it. Confronted with excruciating pain, people will tell you what they know. However, the “truthful” information is construed with incomplete or mixed with false information to appease the torturer. Because interrogators are not all-knowing, they couldn’t tell which bits of information were true and which were false. Thus, this leads to the interrogator inflicting more pain on the victim (Costanzo & Gerrity 2009). Many survivors of torture reported that they would have said anything for the torture to stop. This information of course is all speculation, because torture-based interrogation are usually conducted in secret. There is no direct research on the relationship between torture and false confession. Even though there is no correlation between torture and false confession, it should still be used in certain situations. If the suspect is known to be part of a terrorist organization and has vital information on a plot to harm innocent people, it should be used to the fullest extent. If we do not have hard evidence that the suspect is involved with committing future actions, it should be avoided. If interrogation is in-acted without evidence to support this claim it could lead to another Maher Arar situation. He was a Canadian citizen who was taken by U.S. officials in Kennedy…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some of us are always told to never give up, to always fight for what we believe. But sometimes giving up is our only option, it is the only thing that will keep us alive. In “Cesare Beccaria, on Torture, of Crimes and Punishments, 1764,” we see how by torturing people they give up and declare themselves guilty. Torture should not be something that should be part of questioning because when a person is tortured they cannot handle any more pain so they tell the people that are torturing them what they want to hear in order to stop them from hurting them anymore. Throughout history, torture has been one of the many ways people have used to have others confess their crimes but what many of us never consider is that sometimes innocent people declare…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the UN Convention Against Torture, any infliction of torture1 i.e. waterboarding is banned under international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the 21st century. The point of contention is whether torture under any circumstances should be entirely prohibited. This opinion piece will be centered towards the debate regarding interrogation using torture methods and argue that torture is never acceptable from the moral and utilitarian perspectives.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics