Board of Education case, a 9-0 vote ruled by the Supreme Court justices in favor of the Brown family, found separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. Chief Justice Earl Warren, who delivered the majority opinion, explained that their decision was not decided merely on the differences in the “tangible factors” of curricula, qualifications, and salaries of teachers between white schools and black schools, but rather the court addressed the importance of “look[ing] instead to the effect of segregation itself on public education.” After addressing the justice’s reasoning for their ruling on this case, Warren continues to evaluate that “In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education…” and identifies that separating children “... solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone…” Generally speaking, Warren believed that the effects that education segregation has on the potential and brightness of the minds of African American children are too destructive to continue on with the precedent of “separate but equal” and establishes, with the decision of this case, that a change in society was much …show more content…
Considering diversity within the campus is an important factor for college boards across the country, the admission offices are prone to deny applicants of common, white ethnicity if an applicant of the same, or lessened, qualifications, but who obtains a more diverse ethnicity. Although this practice may seem to be in favor with what the Brown v. Board of Education desired to accomplish, it is reasonable to question if the importance of diversity over the best applicants has taken things far beyond the extent of equal opportunity to education. More specifically, the University of California at Davis (a medical program) has a regular admission program and a special admission program. Most students fall under the regular admission program and have to meet certain requirements such as above a 2.5 GPA. However, the special admission program accepts the applicants of the minority group and have been found to be disadvantaged through the education system in the past. Where the unfairness comes up is that the “Special candidates… did not have to meet the 2.5 grade point cutoff and were not ranked against candidates in the general admissions process” (Regents of University). With the standards of the minority applicants straying from the standards of the majority applicants, the inequitability of the college admission process has