The first very clear difference is the way the books are written. In World Religions, Toropov and Buckles use a number of symbols as well as text boxes of information that are not connected with the majority of the text. This is very different from the style utilized by Prothero which uses only paragraphs. The second difference between the two is the way that the text is written. In Toropov and Buckles, the text is written in a very reader friendly style that in a way softens the complexity of the ideas being presented. Due to this fact, the book is an easy read and a majority of the points can be understood. In Prothero, the book has a more sophisticated type of writing and uses a more refined vocabulary. Because of this the reader may have to read more critically as a way to get the most of the text. The third difference is the fact that Prothero utilized personal stories in his work. This is not the case in Torpor and Buckles. An example of this is in the section of Prothero titled, “Big Questions.” In this section, Prothero begins it by saying, “Every year I tell my BU graduates…”(Prothero 22). Personal experiences are a way to enhance the literature and none of these can be found in Toropov and
The first very clear difference is the way the books are written. In World Religions, Toropov and Buckles use a number of symbols as well as text boxes of information that are not connected with the majority of the text. This is very different from the style utilized by Prothero which uses only paragraphs. The second difference between the two is the way that the text is written. In Toropov and Buckles, the text is written in a very reader friendly style that in a way softens the complexity of the ideas being presented. Due to this fact, the book is an easy read and a majority of the points can be understood. In Prothero, the book has a more sophisticated type of writing and uses a more refined vocabulary. Because of this the reader may have to read more critically as a way to get the most of the text. The third difference is the fact that Prothero utilized personal stories in his work. This is not the case in Torpor and Buckles. An example of this is in the section of Prothero titled, “Big Questions.” In this section, Prothero begins it by saying, “Every year I tell my BU graduates…”(Prothero 22). Personal experiences are a way to enhance the literature and none of these can be found in Toropov and