Preview

Bullying Should Be Taught In Schools Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bullying Should Be Taught In Schools Essay
The controversy is on! The Supreme Court has ruled to have limits on what students can say in the school newspaper. After a battle between the Supreme Court and the District Court, they've came to a conclusion that the school newspaper should be about educational news only. Personally, I agree; some teens are bullied each day, students are rebellious, and teachers should limit them mainly because its school property.
We all know that some students just don't care. They are rebellious and do not really care about whose feelings they hurt. For example, if a non-caring student happens to be a part of Journalism, they're more than likely going to say things they aren't supposed to or they aren't going to do anything at all. I think that these classes need to have limits on what to say and things that are said in the newspaper should be school related only. I have learned from experience that things aren't always how we
…show more content…
Or that approximately 160,000 teens skip school every day because of bullying? 17% of American students report being bullied 2 to 3 times a month or more within a school semester! Allowing students to freely publish the school newspaper could easily increase these numbers by ten! Teens bully other students by many different ways. For example, cyberbullying. It's the most common type of bullying in the United States. Why? Because some students do it without even realizing it! This could open another doorway for students to 'get revenge' on other classmates by posting embarrassing facts about them. Like I have said before, the school newspaper should be about school news only! There's so many things that could go wrong with having no limits on the newspaper. Some may say that giving students the free will to write whatever will prepare them for the real world but if students write things that are uncalled for it could lead to fights, disruption in the class, or even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In my opinion it reflects the majority being as it’s the school’s tabloid. I also believe the school has the right to remove pages if they deem the material inappropriate. These articles would not have been in the best interest for the students. The students feel it is freedom of speech, but the administration feels it is unfitting for a school newspaper.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes they should be able to censor the students’ papers if it is inappropriate and unnecessary.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights, but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others, he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image. The minority opinion claims that the articles removed still represented individual student views. Those who argued the dissenting opinion justified it by expressing concern over what permitting censorship will do in the long run. For instance, if censorship was permitted in this case, it would set a precedent for general student censorship with…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only issue the Supreme Court rules are that if perhaps the freedom of expression is being used to distract students from a learning environment in classrooms it becomes a…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case the principal refused approval to print. His reasoning was for the pregnancy article it mentioned birth control and sexual activity along with information from an anonymous source, but he felt readers would be able to figure out the person's identity. The divorce article was booted because it has a parents name. The court sided with the school because the newspaper is the schools (Brenyo). In this situation, the school does have the right to censor because it is their Newspaper, but they also missed out on an opportunity to address these important issues in a safe, professional setting and manner.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    04.03 The Decision

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I favored a loose interpretation in this case. Although students have rights, there is a need for certain rights to be restricted to avoid any disruptions and chaos within the student body. This is one case where I believe the school was using these restrictions properly to protect the rights and best interest of others. Even though the school newspaper is a form of public expression, the newspaper was school sponsored therefore it had every right to alter the paper.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelwood Case Summary

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are already problems of young adults not being taken seriously, this decision only worsens that. Student expression is extremely important and allowing censorship without clear cut rules blocks the thoughts of young minds. The Supreme Court needs to clear up questions regarding Hazelwood and the First Amendment eventually. Until then students will have to deal with the reduced protection of the First Amendment in schools and hope school officials won’t take advantage of the Hazelwood…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that high schools should have open lunches. Students should be able to leave the school grounds and go to a fast food restaurant, or, if they choose should at least be able to go outside and eat. Students need to have a small break from school during the day, even if they are outside, they still can take their minds off of school work for a while. Students need to have fresh air and adequate sunlight. Fresh air and sunlight is a proven fact to help students in their studies and it also helps the students concentrate more. I understand that the school staff would not like the fact that the students would be able to leave campus without supervision. Are not the students in high school? Should we not have the responsibility to be able…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unless the kids are saying something pertaining to the school they should have the right to say it without getting in trouble. Like if a kid says something about shooting up a school then the school can punish him. But if it’s something that doesn’t directly connect to the school like saying racist jokes then they shouldn’t get in trouble by the school because it doesn’t directly pertain the school. Giving punishments in school for something outside of school is like punishing someone for rape when they only shoplifted. So school should only punish for things done in…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Students at Central High School have written an article called “Underage Drinking Rampant at Central High”. The article is in the High School newspaper called The Tiger’s Eye”. The article is about teenagers from the high school are underage drinking and it is out of control. The students want to distribute the news paper to the school. The School’s Administration is against the distribution of this article. The principal and superintendent believe the article should be censored from the school.But the students believe that distributing the article will inform younger teenagers about underage drinking, and will prevent them from drinking. Although the Administration believes that the newspaper should be surpressed, it should still be distributed.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature is art, it's how authors express themselves, and that would take that opportunity away from them. Taking that away from an author is like taking away their ability to speak through the pages as they had before. Just because what is in a book doesn’t appeal to someone else, and it wouldn’t be good for a child to read them, doesn’t mean there has to be any sort of ban on any book. Adults may attempt to prohibit books because of suggestive behavior being displayed in them, although kids should be allowed to figure out the wrong from the right by themselves during their lives. Younger children should not be able to have their hands on books with bad behavior and profanity, but as they get older, adults should not heavily guard them from such things. Children need to learn about censorship for themselves at younger ages, while they learn quickly and more efficiently. The right of escaping the real world and enjoying a simple book should never be taken away from any person. Adolescents could very well be having a hard time in their life, and books could potentially help them. This can apply to school, too. If someone doesn't have a lot of friends, they are able to dive into the book and feel like they are a part of something bigger.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teenagers are reading more books than ever now, and some people say that we have Harry Potter to thank. But surrounding teen books is the 'myth' of book banning. Some may think that only old books were banned, and that they are now back on the shelves of schools and libraries around the country. This is not so. Not only have old classics such as The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger been banned, but newer books are being challenged as well. The controversy of book banning stems from the pursuit of knowledge. Though Hitler did many bad things in his lifetime schools still teach about the Holocaust, and yet now parents are requesting that their children do not learn what certain books have to offer in the way of knowledge. But some parents do not stop there. Books are being taken off school shelves, depriving all students instead of just one. Can one person influence a whole school or town? Is this even fair to everyone involved? The answer is no. Book banning should be illegal because reading a book is an individual choice, some books are banned without much thought, and sometimes books are banned without all parties involved reading it.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many schools in America have banned books in their libraries for the content in certain books. the name behind this idea is called censorship. Books are censord because people feel like it will protect children from certain ideas, improve society, and keeping moral values. Main reason books are censored are for religion, sex, drugs, abuse, social issues, and more. Censorship on books has been a controversal topic for many years. Censorship in schools should not be allowed because it infringes on the first amendment, stops people from learning about social injustices, and censorship can skew the truth.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays