Preview

Business Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law
Business Law TRI 1, 2011
Assessment 1

3) Norris had decided for some time that he wanted to purchase a motel. After looking at several different areas, he settled on Port Stephens in New South Wales as offering him both the potential for a business and the lifestyle he was seeking. He rang a number of real estate agents, inquiring whether they had any motels listed for sale. He finally found a motel and general business listed with an estate agent called Evatt. Evatt told Norris that once he got going in this business it would be a gold mine. Norris sought an accountant’s advice and then proceeded to buy the business. Within six months of buying the motel and general business Norris was broke because there were neither the tourist numbers nor the local population to sustain the business.
Can Norris sue the estate agent for his statements about the business? Will he succeed? Explain your answers.
Yes, Norris can sue the estate agent for the statements about the business. “People who unintentionally or carelessly give false advice, information or opinions on business or professionals matter may be liable for negligent misstatement if the receiver reasonably relied on the false material and suffered economics loss”
Here, Norris being an indivisual interested to buy a property as mentioned above who even did some homeworks before buying it.Evatt being a professional agent was his duty to inform Morris about the position since it is his profession to find out whereabouts of that place. Norris has full right to know about pros and cons of buying that property . In this kind of matter an advice or suggestions from responsible party makes a lot of influence in making descision to the buyers so here Evatt owes a responsibility of providing proper information.We can take example of Shaddock v Parramatta City Council for negligent misstatement. Defendant Evatt was fully responsible to provide proper guidelines which he did not and even predicted false

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    United States

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: No. A contract to convey real property did not exist between Heikkila and McLaughlin. David McLaughlin submitted written offers to purchase three of the parcels. If Heikkila had written and submitted the three parcels also stating the amount she was going to sell them at, then she would be in the wrong. But, in this circumstance, that wasn’t the case.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 12 Tute Questions

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 3: Nicole recently entered into a contract to sell her house in Canberra to Lakeview Developments Pty Ltd for $750,000. She was told by the receptionist in Lakeview's office that Lakeview Developments is a development company which plans to demolish the house and build some apartments. The contract was signed by Nicole and was also signed 'for and on behalf of Lakeview Developments Pty Ltd' by Anthony Blunt, who showed her his business card describing him as the 'Developments Manager' of Lakeview Developments.…

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case 9 deals with a homeowner (the principle) who lists her property for sale and enters into an agreement with an agent to facilitate a sale with a third party. Over the course of the agency agreement a prospective buyer inspected the property but didn’t make an offer before the agency agreement expired. The legal issue that arises comes after the agency agreement expires. The prospective buyer later decided to put in an offer, which was accepted, but once discovering that the agreement between the principle and agent had expired brought legal action against the agent.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case I have chosen is Meras Engineering, INC., et al. (Plaintiffs) V. CH20, INC., et al., (Defendants). Meras Engineering is a provider of water treatment solutions. They develop products that treat industrial and agricultural water applications. CH20 is a similar company that provides clients with chemicals that control the biological fouling in cooling towers. Rich Beriner and Jay Sughroue were employed by CH20 and signed a non-compete agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O, INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 9 Final Paper

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Generally, agents are under a duty to obey the lawful and reasonable instructions of the principal. Where the principal's instructions are clear, the agent does not normally have any discretion and must follow those instructions, unless an agent is a professional and the principal relies on the agent to exercise his professional skill and discretion in accomplishing the tasks he has been appointed to accomplish. However, if the principal's instructions are ambiguous or if the agent is not certain as to their meanings, the agent should clarify such instructions with the principal before acting. An agent is obligated to obey promptly and efficiently all lawful instructions of his principal. However, this duty plainly does not include an obligation to obey any unlawful instructions; for example, an instruction not to market the property to minorities or to misrepresent the condition of the property. Compliance with instructions the agent knows to be unlawful could constitute a breach of an agent’s duty of loyalty. The relationship between an…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. State whether the following provisions in a note impair or preclude negotiability, the instrument in each instance being otherwise in proper form. Answer each statement with either “Negotiable” or Nonnegotiable” and explain why.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agency and Employment Exam

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The described scenario deals with agency by ratification. Unauthorized actions by an agent do not bind the principal to a contract. If an agent attempts an unauthorized act on behalf of the principal, the principal may either ignore or ratify the act. Ratification may be expressed in words or conduct and requires three conditions—that the agent purported to act on behalf of the identified principal, that the principal must have been capable of authorizing the act when it occurred and when it was ratified, and that the principal have full awareness of all material facts. Once an act is ratified, it is in effect as if originally authorized. While Ames was not initially authorized to purchase such merchandise at the price he…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Is Bright entitled to specific performance because of the unique nature of the goods?…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark Realty Inc., a real estate broker, entered into four separate agreements with owner Tilman A. Rogness. Mark Realty was entitled to “exclusive right of sale.” For a stated period of time, this agreement gave the broker the exclusive right of sale for the property for a stated price and on stated terms. During the time provided, Rogness “canceled, revoked, and terminated” the brokerage agreements before the properties sold. The broker sued on account that brokerage commission was never received from the owner. The owner argued that since he canceled the contracts before the properties were sold, the broker never performed their duties and therefor was not entitled to commission. The trial judge ruled that Mark Realty Inc. had entered into a unilateral contract with Rogness which meant that the broker would only receive commission if he performed by “finding a purchaser of the above property.” The trial judge ruled in favor of the owner (University of Phoenix, 2012, Mark realty, Inc. v. Rogness).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Duty of Loyalty

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the limited information given the most relevant quote is “Sue and Tom are business partners”. This would mean that Tom and Sue are fifty-fifty principals within there partnership. I believe that Sue had the requirement to inform Tom of the decision to buy the property and also to increase Tom’s response time when it was apparent he was on vacation and unable to give her his decision. Tom’s response to Sue of “I think the partnership should buy the property”, without knowing that Sue had already made the purchase shows his intent to add the property to the partnership.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In law, agents are recognized as having the power to affect the legal rights, liabilities and relationships of the principal. In CAVMONT MERCHANT BANK v AMAKA AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS5, the Supreme Court held that where an agent in making the contract discloses both the interest and the names of the principal on whose…

    • 3421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    An agent is a person authorized to negotiate and enter into contracts on behalf of another who is known as the principal in his dealings with a third party. The legal relationship between an agent and a principal is an agency. For examples, between a client as a principal (P) and lawyer as an agent(A), employer (P) and employee (A), house owner (P) and housing agent (A) and others. The principal and the agent are in an employment contract where the terms of appointment and authority have been set out. The effect is the principal will be bound by any contract the agent makes while acting within his authority For example, the agent is employed to sell the principal’s house. An agreement is made by the agent with the third party…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Khalid is interested in buying Siti’s painting which she had named “Hawa”, Khalid met Siti and told her that he will pay her RM5,000 for “Hawa”. This is an offer. Offer had be defined in S2(a) Contracts Act 1950 as “when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to the act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal”. Under the Contract Act 1950, a proposal is something which is capable of being converted into an agreement by its acceptance. Moreover, merely giving information is not an offer. For example of Harvey v Facey (1893) case, P telegraphed D – “Will you sell us Bumber Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price.” D replied, “Lowest cash price £900.” P purported to accept the offer. The court held that price information is merely information. There was no offer to accept. Khalil had given clear information that he want to buy Siti’s painting with the price RM 5, 000, the offer is exist. But Siti said she will think about it. Two weeks after she made her mind that she want to sell the painting to Khalid for RM7,000 not Rm 5,000. This is a counter offer not acceptance. Counter offer had be defined in S6(c) Contracts Act 1950 as “by the failure of the acceptor to fulfill a condition precedent to acceptance.” Siti as the offeree makes a count offer revokes the original offer which made by Khalil. Counter offer had also defined in S7(a) Contracts Act 1950 in order to convert a proposal into a promise that acceptance it must “be absolute and unqualified”. It does refer to the case of Hyde v Wrench (1840), D made an offer to sell his house for £1000. P purposely accepted at £950 but D refused, P accepted the original offer of £1000. The court held that counter offer terminated the original offer. There was nothing to accept. Furthermore, acceptance had be define in S2(b) Contracts Act…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays