Business Law
Case Study 4.7
1. Assume you were the member of the panel that presided over the academic misconduct hearing involving Zane Cobin. Given just the information provided in the case, how would you have voted at the conclusion of the hearing? Defend your answer.
Answer: If I were one of the members in the panel at the conclusion of the hearing I would acquit vote for Corbin. Cobin shows a lot of efforts in order to win the up church medal. .
2. Again, assume you were a member of the five – person panel appointed to review the charge of academic misconduct filed against Zane Cobin. What questions would you have posted to Zane, Professor Herrick, and professor Goggans during questions have affected your vote at the conclusion of the hearing?
Answer:
If I were a member of the five – person panel appointed to review the charge of academic misconduct against Zane Cobin; I would have to ask Cobin why he did not attend the Beta alpha Psi meeting by the time he received an e-mail since it shows he was …show more content…
As noted in this case, email messages generally have a “low expectation of privacy.” What does that phrase mean and what implications does it have business professionals?
Answer: Now a day technology is growing rapidly. Electronically communications (e-mail) is one of the technology we use it in our everyday life in business or personal life therefore; using technology has advantages and disadvantages. In this case low expectation of privacy mean to me it has less confidentiality. However, even if low expectation of privacy existed we still use all kinds of electronic communication. The implication in business professional use of internet fundamentally on cautiously keeps the stability of individual right and common duties.
2. What ethical or professional standard should auditors consider when writing email messages and when communicating on social media networks? What consequences may auditors face if they violet those
1. Assume you were the member of the panel that presided over the academic misconduct hearing involving Zane Cobin. Given just the information provided in the case, how would you have voted at the conclusion of the hearing? Defend your answer.
Answer: If I were one of the members in the panel at the conclusion of the hearing I would acquit vote for Corbin. Cobin shows a lot of efforts in order to win the up church medal. .
2. Again, assume you were a member of the five – person panel appointed to review the charge of academic misconduct filed against Zane Cobin. What questions would you have posted to Zane, Professor Herrick, and professor Goggans during questions have affected your vote at the conclusion of the hearing?
Answer:
If I were a member of the five – person panel appointed to review the charge of academic misconduct against Zane Cobin; I would have to ask Cobin why he did not attend the Beta alpha Psi meeting by the time he received an e-mail since it shows he was …show more content…
As noted in this case, email messages generally have a “low expectation of privacy.” What does that phrase mean and what implications does it have business professionals?
Answer: Now a day technology is growing rapidly. Electronically communications (e-mail) is one of the technology we use it in our everyday life in business or personal life therefore; using technology has advantages and disadvantages. In this case low expectation of privacy mean to me it has less confidentiality. However, even if low expectation of privacy existed we still use all kinds of electronic communication. The implication in business professional use of internet fundamentally on cautiously keeps the stability of individual right and common duties.
2. What ethical or professional standard should auditors consider when writing email messages and when communicating on social media networks? What consequences may auditors face if they violet those