Laws 310 Week 5 Simulation
Laws 310 Week 5 Simulation
1. The case between Ms. Darcy Vs Big Car Company, I would have to agree 100% with what the Jugde decided to do. Based on the facts that were present, I would have ruled that this move onto trial in front of Jury of our peers as well. While Ms. Darcy was under the direct supervision of Clarence he was rude and forth coming with is attitude towards Ms. Darcy which was presented in lewd and harassing manner. With the many attempts that Ms. Darcy had towards Clarence he would continue to gesture and run into her in very threatening manner and making an hostile work environment for Ms. Darcy. After this had taken place Ms. Darcy with many attempts to speak to another supervisor and putting her concerns on the table to what they can help with nothing came of that request. Also another thing that did not take place is that Darcy requested to be transferred from Clarence line and was never granted that request This to me is what also made the environment a hostile one once more. Based on the information when a person is affected by someone and feel not in friendly work environment this becomes an issue non the less the person that you are uncomfortable with being your direct supervisor.
At this point when Ms. Darcy filed a formal complaint with the company where action took place, but here is where the issue lays for me. The action I believe was taken a bit late and effortless in regards to an employee that was harassed and made all notes to confront and also move to another supervisor. 2nd point would be that after action was taken, suspending the supervisor in this conduct was not sufficient because upon their return I am only still few hundred feet away from that same uncomforted. This action was delayed and not handled properly as it should have been.
2. If I was a juror in this case, I would find that Clarence was a supervisor and found him guilty of sexual harassment. He guided the team’s members on his line, he
1. The case between Ms. Darcy Vs Big Car Company, I would have to agree 100% with what the Jugde decided to do. Based on the facts that were present, I would have ruled that this move onto trial in front of Jury of our peers as well. While Ms. Darcy was under the direct supervision of Clarence he was rude and forth coming with is attitude towards Ms. Darcy which was presented in lewd and harassing manner. With the many attempts that Ms. Darcy had towards Clarence he would continue to gesture and run into her in very threatening manner and making an hostile work environment for Ms. Darcy. After this had taken place Ms. Darcy with many attempts to speak to another supervisor and putting her concerns on the table to what they can help with nothing came of that request. Also another thing that did not take place is that Darcy requested to be transferred from Clarence line and was never granted that request This to me is what also made the environment a hostile one once more. Based on the information when a person is affected by someone and feel not in friendly work environment this becomes an issue non the less the person that you are uncomfortable with being your direct supervisor.
At this point when Ms. Darcy filed a formal complaint with the company where action took place, but here is where the issue lays for me. The action I believe was taken a bit late and effortless in regards to an employee that was harassed and made all notes to confront and also move to another supervisor. 2nd point would be that after action was taken, suspending the supervisor in this conduct was not sufficient because upon their return I am only still few hundred feet away from that same uncomforted. This action was delayed and not handled properly as it should have been.
2. If I was a juror in this case, I would find that Clarence was a supervisor and found him guilty of sexual harassment. He guided the team’s members on his line, he