Preview

Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1076 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline
Chapter 3 & 4 Outline:

Chapter 3: Jurisdiction
Chapter 4: Alternative Dispute Resolution

Chapter 3: Jurisdiction

Equal Protection
14th Amendment of US Constitution
Nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

2009 Iowa Supreme Court Case
Matter of equal protection under the law
Check & Balances of 3 branches of government
Judiciary checking legislative’s power
ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection
PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Plaintiff filed motion for summary judgment and district court affirmed, finding state statue unconstitutional. Defendant appealed

Equal Protection…, (cont’d from above)
The law must treat equally all similarly situated people.
Heterosexuals and homosexuals - “similarly situated?” = committed, loving relationships
Rational basis test: - plaintiff has the burden to prove that it is unconstitutional
Defendant’s “rational basis”: Man - woman marriage definition is constitutional & best for society because:
Provides stable child-rearing
Conserves states resources - state taxing returns
Promotes concept/integrity of traditional nation of marriage
Plaintiff’s rebuttal:
Same-sex couples provide stable child-rearing
Many married heterosexuals file separate tax returns…so state will not be “robbed”
Cannot use religion to justify law
Protect free exercise of religion
**Supreme Court affirmed lower courts holding that this is unconstitutional. Defendants can still appeal from state to supreme court.

Jurisdiction
A courts power and authority over a matter
Two types required before court can hear case:
Personal (power over the people/property)
Subject matter (power over dispute)
“Personal jurisdiction”
Power over person
Obtained through personal service of summons upon him/her while in state where lawsuit is commenced.
Substituted service for corporations
Registered agent; International Shoe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bus311 Business Law I

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A contract is a legally enforceable agreement that is created when two or more people agree to perform or to avoid performing certain acts that they have a legal right to do and that meet certain legal requirements (Liuzzo, 2013). An example of a contract exists between an assistant and the manger. That contact can be extended once the assistant becomes a partner and so forth. Contracts can be extended or changed as needed to reflect the contractual relationship.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial Court level: Plaintiff Sutter sues Defendant Hutchings. Defendant filed summary judgment motion, and court granted judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff appealed.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5 6

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Consideration consists of mutual exchange of gains and losses between contracting parties. In the exchange, a gain by the offer is at the same time a loss to the offeror. The legal term used to designate the gain that each party experiences is that party 's legal benefit. Consideration has three characteristics 1) The agreement must involve a bargained-for exchange; 2)the contract must involve adequate consideration; and 3) the benefits and detriments promised must themselves be legal.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BRANDENBURG brief

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page

    The appellant was convicted by the Ohio criminal syndicalism for statue Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 2923.13. The appellant challenged the constitutionalism of his conviction in intermediate appellate court of Ohio, but the affirmed his conviction. The supreme court of Ohio dismissed his appeal.…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article reports on Lance Armstrong who is famous cyclist that use performances-enhancing drugs to bring his career to a successful.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the basic argument given by Justice Powell on why the University of California’s admission policy was wrong?…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ginsburg Summary

    • 12620 Words
    • 51 Pages

    ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT [June 29, 2009]…

    • 12620 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • ensured any judicial decision with respect to such property rights will be honored and enforced in all states…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays