Preview

Case Brief: Sutter V. Hutchings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Brief: Sutter V. Hutchings
Case Brief: Sutter v. Hutchings

Case Name, Citation & Court:

Sutter v. Hutchings, 254 Ga. 194, 327 S.E.2d 717, Georgia Supreme Court, decided 1985.

Parties & Procedural History:

Trial Court level: Plaintiff Sutter sues Defendant Hutchings. Defendant filed summary judgment motion, and court granted judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

First appeal: Ga. Court of Appeals affirmed judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals again to Ga. Supreme Court.

Facts:

Mrs. Susan Hutchings permitted her 17-year old daughter to provide a keg of beer at a party the daughter was having at their home for some high school classmates. Mrs. Hutchings, as hostess, observed a 17-year old guest, Carlton Turner, engaged in a drinking game called “quarters.” When Turner left at 11:30 PM, the keg was empty and he was noticeably intoxicated, having consumed the equivalent of 7 bottles of beer. Mrs. Hutchings expressed concern over his driving ability, but watched him get into his car. Less than 4 miles away, he sped through a red light and killed David Sutter. Sutter’s widow is suing Mrs. Hutchings and her daughter.

Plaintiff’s Cause of Action: negligence

Issue: Whether a person who furnishes alcohol to a noticeably intoxicated person under the legal drinking age, knowing that such person would soon be driving, is liable to a third person injured by the negligence of the intoxicated driver.

Defendant’s Argument: Mrs. Sutter was not serving the alcohol. The teenage guests in her house at her daughter’s party were serving themselves. Unlike commercial liquor establishments, they have no bouncers to prevent drunken drivers from leaving. The common law rule creates no cause of action against someone who provides alcohol to someone who voluntarily becomes intoxicated, and consequently injures himself or someone else.

Rule (of Law that answers the Issue in this case):

A host/hostess owes a duty to those using the highways to not subject

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early morning hours of September 18, 1992, a police officer employed by defendant Town of Cheektowaga pulled over an automobile owned by plaintiff's decedent, Jacqueline Walsh. An acquaintance of Walsh was driving and she was a passenger. As the result of the traffic stop, the acquaintance was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated. Based upon his observations of Walsh, the officer determined that Walsh was also intoxicated and unable to drive safely. The officer testified that he offered to call a cab or give Walsh a ride to any destination she chose, but Walsh…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue is whether an establishment, which serves alcohol to underage patrons, is liable for injuries or damages resulting from the intoxication of the underage patron.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rehearing and the divided court again reversed the jury verdict in a 3-2 decision, prior to which the…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deputies kicked him several times in the stomach attempting to force the capsules out of his body.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are times when people drive home under the influence of alcohol. Many times, people get home without getting pulled over by the local police department, sheriff’s department or the state patrol. Drivers who do get pulled over for drunk driving will be arrested and need to hire an attorney. Lawyers represent men and women in the courtroom, and negotiate lighter sentences with judge and district attorney’s office, there are even times when the case gets dismissed altogether even those the individual were clearly impaired behind the wheel breaking the law. My argument for my paper is whether or not there should be stricter DUI laws in the state of Wisconsin.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 2.03(c) does not preclude Ms. Fleshman’s claim for negligent undertaking because section 2.03(3) applies only to those responsible for providing alcohol to others. First, the Radcliffes were not providing alcohol to the party, in fact they made no affirmative action to make alcohol available, and so do not fall under the purview of the statute. Second,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current common law rule about duty of care of social hosts involving parties where guests bring and consume their own alcoholic beverages follows under the synonym of common law: general rule. In the case of Child V. Desormeaux, it was proven by the courts that the social hosts did not own a duty of care to the people injured by the defendant’s actions. “I conclude that as a general rule, a social host does not owe a duty of care to a person injured by a guest who has consumed alcohol and that the courts below correctly dismissed the appellants’ action.” The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the case of Child v. Desormeaux supports the current common law rule about the duty of care involving social hosts that they are no responsible…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Webquest

    • 2845 Words
    • 12 Pages

    7 “(4) Where the person has substantially impaired...by administering or employing without the knowledge of the complainant, drugs, intoxicants, or other means”…

    • 2845 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals court “appellate court” has the final verdict for the state. The judgment in this court are final, one cannot appeal the case unless it engaged in any federal laws or legitimate procedures.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intoxication

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As members of society we would like to believe that just because one is intoxicated while they committed a criminal offence, that this would not mitigate their guilt. In the case of Reniger v Fogossa in 1552 it was stated that, ‘if a person who is drunk kills another this shall be a felony… and yet he did it through ignorance, for when he was drunk he had no understanding nor memory; but in as much as that ignorance was occasioned by his own act and folly, it shall not be privileged thereby.’ In the modern age, the increasing amount of crimes being committed while one is intoxicated has resulted in the law tightening the scope on the issue. It has created rules to attempt to strike a balance between imposing criminal liability on the accused that had no mens rea, while trying to protect the public from those who deliberately took something to put them in a condition where they could not control their actions. Public policy is a strong factor in determining whether the defendant’s intoxication can be used to negate the mens rea of a crime.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Decision = did the court find for the claimant or defendant? If there was more…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays