DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00822.x
Does Strategic Planning Enhance or Impede Innovation and
Firm Performance?Ã
Michael Song, Subin Im, Hans van der Bij, and Lisa Z. Song
Does strategic planning enhance or impede innovation and firm performance? The current literature provides contradictory views. This study extends the resource-advantage theory to examine the conditions in which strategic planning increases or decreases the number of new product development projects and firm performance. The authors test the theoretical model by collecting data from 227 firms.
The empirical evidence suggests that more strategic planning and more new product development (NPD) projects lead to better firm performance. Firms with organizational redundancy benefit more from strategic planning than firms with less organizational redundancy. Increasing R&D intensity boosts both the number of NPD projects and firm performance. Strategic planning is more effective in larger firms with higher R&D intensity for increasing the number of NPD projects. The results reported in this study also consist of several findings that challenge the traditional views of strategic planning. The evidence suggests that strategic planning impedes, not enhances, the number of NPD projects. Larger firms benefit less, not more, from strategic planning for improving firm performance. Larger firms do not necessarily create more NPD projects. Increasing organizational redundancy has no effect on the number of NPD projects.
These empirical results provide important strategic implications. First, managers should be aware that, in general, formal strategic planning decreases the number of NPD projects for innovation management. Improvised rather than planned activities are more conducive to creating NPD project ideas. Moreover, innovations tend to emerge from improvisational processes, during which the impromptu execution
References: Ackoff, R. L. 1970. A concept of corporate planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Aiken, L. S., and S. G. West. 1991. Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interactions Anderson, P. F. 1982. Marketing, strategic planning, and the theory of the firm Ansoff, H. I. 1991. Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘‘The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management.’’ Strategic Management Journal 12 (6): 449–61. DeSarbo, W. S., C. A. Di Benedetto, M. Song, and I. Sinha. 2004. Di Benedetto, C. A., W. S. DeSarbo, and M. Song. 2008. Strategic capabilities and radical innovation: An empirical study in three countries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55 (3): 420–33. Armstrong, J. S., R. J. Brodie, and A. G. Parsons. 2001. Hypotheses in marketing science: Literature review and publication audit Di Benedetto, C. A., and M. Song. 2003. The relationship between strategic type and firm capabilities in Chinese firms Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method Dodgson, M. 1993. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies 14 (3): 375–94. Armstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys Drucker, P. F. 1954. The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row. Baker, W. E., and J. M. Sinkula. 2005. Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments Armstrong, J. S. 1982. The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research. Strategic Management Journal 3 (3): 197–211. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch. 1980. Regression diagnostics. Brown, S. L., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (2): 223–44. Calantone, R., R. Garcia, and C. Droge. 2003. The effects of environ¨ mental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Chandy, R. K., and G. J. Tellis. 1998. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize Chandy, R. K., and G. J. Tellis. 2000. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing Research 64 (July): 1–17. Chelariu, C., W. J. Johnston, and L. Young. 2002. Learning to improvise, improvising to learn: A process of responding to complex environments Eisenhardt, K. M., and J. A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (October-November): Eisenhardt, K. M., and B. N. Tabrizi. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Frederickson, J. W. 1984. The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions Galbraith, C. S. 1990. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms Glazer, R. 1991. Marketing in an information-intensive environment: Strategic implications of knowledge as an asset Griffin, A. 1997. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12: 83–103. Hayes, R. H., S. C. Wheelwright, and K. Clark. 1988. Dynamic manufacturing. New York: The Free Press. Christensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Homburg, C., J. P. Workman, and H. Krohmer. 1999. Marketing’s influence within the firm Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product development performance. Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures Cohen, W., and R. C. Levin. 1989. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, ed Hunt, S. D., and R. M. Morgan. 1995. The comparative advantage