The book Bystander, by James Preller, is about a boy named Eric Hayes. Eric moves to Bellport, Long Island, and he starts 7th grade at Bellport Middle School. Eric meets a boy named Griffin, as he starts school. Griffin is cool and very popular, but always seems to be in trouble. As Eric begins to spend more time with Griffin, he realizes that Griffin bullies a kid named David Hallenback. When Eric stands up for David, he gets on Griffin’s bad side. Eventually, the two boys stop being friends, because of the way Griffin treats David. Throughout the book, Eric realizes who his real friends are, and that Griffin is not one of them.…
Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…
The main idea of Source one, is teaching us a lesson about how to be a good Samaritan. This Happened in France with Princess Diana. She had a accident and paparazzi was just taking pictures and he was not helping Princess Diana, wild she was dying and he didn’t care he was just worrying for the pictures. Why we don’t help others when they need it. We don’t help because we don’t want to get involve if something else happened. We think we will get involve with problems, and that made us bad persons, we are not Samaritans. In the second Source “Good Samaritans U.S.A. Are Afraid to Act”. Yes for me and for other people, We are afraid to act because we are selfish and we don’t feel the pain of the other person. Another thing is that is not a obligation to help, so we don’t care.( Source 2) Another reason is that one can ignore the victims because they have no legal obligation to assist because the U.S.A. citizens will sue them for any damage they do for trying to help. And you don’t now if the person is feigning the injuries and it’s just trying to kill you or do bad things. This is another rason why people doesn’t help. (Gloria and Lisa Bloom P.G 334-335)…
Response Essay to 37 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police “Let that girl alone!” was all the effort a bystander, witnessing an attack, could put into saving a woman’s life; the man couldn’t be bothered with anything more. Miss Kitty Genovese could have survived that night two separate times if someone would have simply lifted the telephone to call the police and report seeing her attacked. At the time of her death 37 people had witnessed her trying to frantically escape from her assailant. There were no qualms when the witnesses were questioned as to why they didn’t bother helping a woman that they could hear pleading for her life; all with meaningless replies of inconvenience.…
Today’s global environment has become more violent than just a decade ago. The majority of attacks has been on civilians in atmospheres where few, if any, of the victims are expected to be armed and able to defend themselves. However, hindsight reports from law enforcement personnel admit that if more private citizens were armed, the number of lethal crimes would most likely decrease. This is because criminals won’t know who, or how many, individuals are armed and ready to protect themselves and their loved ones.…
There are many different kinds of violence in the United States, and interpersonal violence is extremely common. This includes violence against any people who know each other. This can include couples, family members, and parent-child relationships. For many, the answer to reducing this kind of violence, and other criminal activity is to increase the power of law-abiding civilians. This includes liberal gun restriction, and especially, the promotion of concealed weapon carry. It is widely believed that arming civilians will reduce crime because they will have greater opportunity and resources to protect themselves when police and other law-enforcement officials cannot. However, there…
As you wait to cross the street, a blind man is standing in front of you. Without warning, he begins to cross the street even though the light has not changed in his favor. He seems to be in no danger until you see a car about a half mile away speeding towards him. Totally unaware of the situation, the man continues walking across the street. As you and many others watch in horror he is struck by the car. Although every single one of you had plenty of time to rescue him, you just watched, hoping that someone else would do it. After all, you don't know him so it's really none of your business. This is what is referred to as "bystander apathy". People close enough to see, hear and possibly touch one another are socially distant and totally indifferent to the fact that another human being may be dying, in immediate danger, or asking for help. This extremely sad urban problem is just that- a problem of cities. The likelihood of this occurring increases with the number of people present and it is probable that there will be many people to witness an event when it happens in high density cities. Urban sociologists, social psychologists, and criminologists have argued for years that the size of cities is directly related to the amount of "social pathology" they contain. The legal consequences are not severe. Unless an individual is a certified medical doctor, they have no obligation in Alberta to help anyone in need. So generally, they don't. The personal consequences may be more severe. Feelings of guilt and regret may follow an event, especially if it ends fatally or if the individual feels that they could have done something significant. Because of this, people attempt to convince themselves and others that they were justified in their inaction because "it wasn't their place", "I didn't want to do it alone", or "I didn't want to get involved." Excuses like this often stem from fears of being seen as abnormal, possible physical harm, public embarrassment, possible…
According to Harvey Rosenthal of the New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, "It is sad that almost the only time meaningful public attention turns to our community is in the wake of a tragedy". I agree with this statement, for it perfectly shows America's disaster-response cycle. We do not anticipate any tragedies, we simply react to them. I believe that, not just with gun violence, Americans need to feel a sense of responsibility to protect their fellow Americans and eliminate problems while they are still growing, not wait until they are endemics. It seems that, whenever a tragedy occurs, we respond by being irrational and trying to cut off the head of the "beast" (guns, in this case) without much consideration for other, more logical solutions. In order to find a logical solution, we first need to realize that guns don't kill people. People kill people with guns. For this reason, banning certain guns or reducing magazine sizes will have a very minor effect, if they have one at. So, since the real "beast" in this case is the population, not guns, we must find a way to prevent possible killers from getting access to firearms. I believe that…
Imagine you are enjoying lunch at school, you're by your friends talking about how your day is going. It is as normal as any day at school, but little do you know that it would soon become the scariest day of your life. Just five short minutes before you are dismissed to fourth hour you hear two loud booms echo across the cafeteria. Everyone looks at eachother, confusion covering their face like a thick blanket. More books are sounded, and everyone soon realizes that the sounds are indeed gunshots. Everyone scatters, and soon, an announcement is sounded. “Attention all teachers, we are now in lockdown mode, I repeat, we are now in lockdown mode.” Students run through the hallways, desperately trying to find an exit. Students run into the gym. Students run outside into the cold air. You hear the gunshots booming behind you as you run; you hear blazing sirens approaching from the street. Soon, everyone is evacuated and the police take down the shooter, but the amount of people hurt is still unknown. Gun laws should be stricter because guns can be easily accessible, they can be dangerous, and violence can be easily prevented.…
Changing Minds notes this was first witnessed in Kitty Genovese’s murder where several people stated that while they noticed her cries for help, they did not call the police or move to help her because they assumed someone else would act and help. The key here is the assumption that someone else will help, that the duty to act and potentially be effected because of helping, is placed on someone else. All liability and duty is placed on the other people around them and it’s ultimately not their problem. As shown in Today’s kidnapping experiment video, people are, more often than not, focused solely on themselves, cut off from what’s occurring around them. Rather than being an active bystander, someone who is actively ignoring the situation at hand, like the lady who glances at the people several times but doesn’t react, passive bystanders are focused solely on themselves and in doing so, do not notice the action occurring, or just don’t care. Reverend Martin Niemöller talks about not speaking out, ending with “then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me,” warning that if people do not intervene early even when it does not effect them, the situation can escalate much larger and eventually will. Movements, multiple people taking actions, helps a larger group be empowered to react as…
“A 2013 research article in the Wall Street Journal reported that the average police response time to an emergency call is 11 minutes, with some responses taking much longer”(“Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun?”-Pro 6). This quote shows that police can’t always get to the situation fast enough to stop it. If you have the ability to stop it before anyone is killed or hurt then that is considered safety and defense. For another example, according to Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, “police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact.” This shows that even when a shooting does break out they usually get the guy buy investigating not stopping him. To further explain, according to “Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun,” “In addition, the Supreme Court has ruled more than once that police officers have no legal duty to protect citizens from violent crime.” This is explaining how even though people think that cops are going to stop a crime, the cops aren’t responsible for protecting the citizens. This is basically saying that citizens are responsible for protecting themselves. How are you going to protect yourself from a shooter if you don't have a weapon. You can defend yourself from an armed person with nothing. It's like trying to get water from an empty glass, it will never…
Writer Christine Watkins, at htt://ww.socialstudies.org claimed that “there are already some 20,000 gun laws in the United States, and that, as more laws pass, more gun violence occurs. “With the significant increase I gun control laws passed by President Obama in the past years, along come a rise in the percentage of gun violence where more gun control laws have been put into action. Stronger gun control laws will make it more difficult for the citizen to protect themselves and their families if a criminal appears. The police aren’t around all the time and might not be able to make it on time or help the situation at…
Do you feel safer sitting next to someone carrying a gun? / Many people say no to that question,/ for many valid reasons. Carrying Concealed weapons have nothing to do with your dad or uncle owning many firearms. / This issue relates solely on allowing individuals to carry these weapons/ almost anywhere in the community:/ including football games,/ restaurants,/ stores,/school buildings/ and other many other places where firearms should strictly be prohibited./ There are 7 states in the nation including Missouri/ that does not let any private citizens carry these weapons. Most people who have permits to carry concealed weapons in their proper states are people who are not law enforcement officials/and have limited training and undergo less testing than even the most basic police recruit./ Even law-abiding citizens/ with the best intentions/ do not know how hard it is to use a gun in successful self-defense. Even highly trained police officers often lose control of their weapons; /according to the National Institute of Justice/ an average of 16% of police officers killed in the line of fire/ are killed by a fellow officers bullet. Yet, they are lead to believe/ that if given a dangerous situation/ they will use the weapon with the proper safety and care that law enforcers will. You cannot ignore the fact that out of the thirty-four thousand and forty firearm deaths in 1998,/ only 212 were justifiable homicides out of self defense /by private citizens with firearms. The gun lobby claims that only law-abiding citizens get permits/. According to statistics this is false./ A recent study done by the Violence Policy Center/ demonstrated that in the first six months on 1997, /the weapon related offense rate among Texas concealed weapon license holders/ were more than twice as high as that general population of Texas. / We know that concealed weapon holders are committing crimes/ as a matter of fact/ 946 crimes were…
Armed citizens frequently prevent crimes from happening, including gun related homicides. Data retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control , there were seven firearms related homicides, for every 100,000 Americans in 1993, there was a 56% increase in the number of guns per person that occurred during the same period when gun violence decreased by 49%. For example , in 2013 the gun homicide rate had fallen by nearly 50% to only 3.6 homicides per 100,000 population. Of course , reasons for decline in homicide are Alcohol consumption and improving economy (Mark J.Perry ). Another reason is a large increase in the number of police officers during 2003 and 2004 (Murder and Homicide Rate). The number of guns per American increased from 0.93 per person in the 1993 to 1.45 in 2013. Which is a…
Most attacks catch victims by surprise anyway. It is very difficult for someone being attacked to pull out their handgun. Anyway, it is fighting violence with violence. It is just unnecessary in my opinion. The few irresponsible people ruin it for everyone else. You can't trust everyone; that would be naive.…