Preview

Can History Be Unbiased?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can History Be Unbiased?
Contrary to a popular belief—one especially among historians and theorists—the lack of objectivity in history books and school textbooks is not hugely problematic. The reason for the previous claim is that, simply, when it comes to historical occurrences, bias and inclinations of perspectives—though can hypothetically be eliminated—are totally inevitable. Historians are human beings, with brains to know, comprehend, and evaluate historical events and consciousnesses to feel and sense the underlying meanings of those events. Similarly, history itself deals with other human beings who had brains to know, comprehend, and evaluate then-occurring events and consciousness to feel and sense the underlying meanings of those events. Therefore, the intermutual relationship between the historian or history writer and his/her historical facts is primarily—however not solely—based on the human way of perceiving things. And it is unquestionably known that a human always perceives things through his own eyes. In other words, any normal person can’t help being somewhat subjective. A historian is a person; therefore, he can never be completely and wholesomely objective when dealing with his historical facts.
To elaborate more clearly, think about a history college student writing an essay about the American Revolutionary War. The college student might, for example, research primary and secondary sources from the American section in a library. One could argue that the essay will come out a hundred percent objective since the student who wrote it did not alter any facts nor invented a new reality to the Revolutionary War. Nonetheless, the material of the essay will still hold a subjective character to it; the American historian, who wrote the books that the student used to help him or her writing the essay, viewed the circumstances and episodes of the war only through his own sense and perspectives thus had a subjective viewpoint. Yet, there are other sources, which the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the reading assignments, the chapter “Who Owns the Past?” in Dangerous Game by MacMillan piqued my interest to elaborate on. In this chapter, she emphasizes that history is written by many historians who have their own views, interpretations, and biases. In this regard, she implies that we should not simply believe in what historians claim, but dig into its sources and figure out from many perspectives. There are many ‘bad’ history produced by historians without offering a wide range of views and this can be used as an instrument that can largely influence on people by giving them prejudice on certain events. There are always reasons behind each event and it is important to find out what indeed happened as well as where the history is…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [1] What do historians create with the history they account? History is a story that never ends. The events of the present in essence have already happened in the past. Historians try to make sense of the present by deconstructing the past. Only through analysis of the past can one understand the present. I remember playing cowboys and Indians as a child. I would always play the part of the cowboys, and consequently the cowboys always won. At the end of my day 's adventure I went to my parents to tell them of my conquest against the Indians. I made certain to include every detail of the battle -- from first charge to last saber stroke. History was made that day in my backyard with the green figurine—soldier on horseback—whose defeat of the Indian nemesis forces was both courageous and honorable.…

    • 3297 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is largely because historians come from a variety of different backgrounds, including but not being limited to different countries, cultures, and government systems. One example of this can be seen through the book The Rape of Nanking by Iris Chang. This text argued that a Japanese onslaught of the Chinese city of Nanking was genocide, which made other historians speculative. They claimed that the intent of the Japanese Army was not to eliminate the Chinese race but to maintain control over the public during their presence, and therefore the event should not be classified as genocide. At this point, many experts seem to hold this point of view. So, why did Chang dissent with…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    While I sit in my US History college course, the only thing I am indebted about is the academically stimulating Professor, who sanctions quality analytical dialogue. If I was required to sit through this class, accepting the fabrications and omissions of the materials, I would have opted for a great amount of “sick days”, along with a lower grade. Upon analysis of the obligatory text, however, I am incessantly reminded of why I so abhorred the subject of history since age ten. I guess I’m just not the type of intellectual, whom likes to be fed a load of bullshit, and then told to swallow it holding a coerced smile, while dutifully citing it as a deliciously satisfying meal of facts. The American history academia is overflowing with emblematic propaganda, heaving with histrionic melodrama, in which teaches pupils to think as simple-minded, white-centric citizens. Here, you will read a comprehensive elucidation on precisely why this is so apparent.…

    • 2636 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am very sure that what students learn in school or by reading history books is a whole different thing to what real historians do. Historians travel a lot and try to see all the places where something happened in order to make their own picture of those places and happenings. Of course nobody can see everything or sometimes the places are not anymore like how they were back then. Also, in most cases there are no people alive to interview as a primary source. And at that point the historians start working. They have to find old letters or diaries or something else from that time. Simon writes about that process as the only way to really find out what happened in the…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    US history 1491-1800

    • 14545 Words
    • 67 Pages

    History is a complex process that combines historical facts and a historian’s interpretation to those facts…

    • 14545 Words
    • 67 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When a person thinks of a historian they would probably say they are a museum curator or someone who just studies the past. However, they truly do not understand what it means to be a historian. In the book The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past, John Gaddis goes into explicit detail on what it takes for a historian to properly and accurately present the past to the public. There are three main elements that I found interesting in this explanation. They are the fact that the historian must use time, space, and scale. As such, we shall delve into this for further examination.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Conrad, the President of the Canadian Historical Association, embodies a traditional historian who has “spent a decade or more mastering a discipline” and thus “sits awkwardly” at the thought that “anyone can be historian.” Indeed, as Conrad argues, in this Age of Wikipedia anyone and everyone can own history. This democratisation of history, which has been galvanised by post-modernism, has troubled traditional historians, exemplifying the conflict between academic and popular history. Ultimately, the only way to overcome such a conflict, is for the historian to be “involved in the wider world where many people have a curiosity about the past and a passion for historical research…”…

    • 849 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historians evaluate sources to determine their legitimacy and reliability. Inspecting the domain can assist in determining the source of a given website. The source should always be identified and evaluated before using it when writing. With technology and the internet as advanced as it is today it is very easy to stumble upon misinformation. Opinionated websites, for-profit websites, and others may provide only one side of a given story or event. An unbiased, responsible source is much better to use.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    abc at abc

    • 3544 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Obtain from my SPSS Data Page the following files: KJ.sav, Poffhoff.sav, and Corr_Regr.savBivariate Analysis: Attitudes About Animals Predicted from Misanthropy…

    • 3544 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Eras of Writing

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Late- nineteenth-century historians, usually called “historicists” or “positivists” believed that history was like science and with practice it could be solved. According to Couvares, Croce believed that Positivists were faulty in their assumptions because history was perceived differently every time it was written down since no one thinks exactly alike. With so many different views, historians are usually adding more and more information to each other’s perceptions.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Betrayal of History by Alexander Stille was an interesting historical perspective about the evolution of textbooks used to teach our children about United States history. Prior to reading this article, I was unaware of the deliberate omissions and lies the publishers used to frame their narrative of our historical events. For example, publishers Holt and Rinehart want to create a multicultural hero for the Hispanic populations of Texas and California so they made up the story that a Spanish explorer Bartolomeo Gomez discovered the Hudson River. When, in fact, Gomez was Portuguese not Spanish and there was no evidence to support that he discovered the river.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carl Becker, author of Everyman His Own Historian, explains in his own words the meaning of history. Becker uses a narrative and facts to support his position. Becker begins by dissecting the textbook definition of history. The definition of history begins as, “the knowledge of events that have occurred in the past”, and later Becker develops the definition to, “history is the memory of things said and done.” Becker supports his change to the original definition by analyzing the actual words used. For example, Becker replaces knowledge with memory. His argument is that memory is needed in order to recollect knowledge. I agree that theses two aspects work hand in hand. Becker further goes on to analyze the words memory and past in the same format. Becker also uses a short narrative to explain the fact that technically every thing is history as soon as it is done. Substantial history is only made if someone believes that the event or fact is relevant or important and gets others to believe it also as Becker goes on to explain, “Left to themselves, the facts do not speak; left to themselves they do not exist, not really, since for all practical purposes there is no fact until some one affirms it.” I completely agree with Becker’s take on history. History only takes form when others believe what you are saying a pass it on to others as truth. Many facts have been misinterpreted over time but is still believed today as…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying, “that there are always two sides to every story,” and this holds true regarding the study of English and History. Throughout my college experience I have found that the information in history textbooks is generally told from a political or outside, after the fact, perspective. Granted, some history classes offer up more personal texts, like that of W.E.B. DuBois’ Souls of Black Fold in History 3393: African American History. However, historical texts still maintain a certain factual tone and/or include statistical data regardless of any personal relevance to the author’s life. English and literature courses present characters and their stories for a reader to become invested in, all while being set in or taking place…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays