Preview

Canada V. Mossop Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Canada V. Mossop Case Study
For this week’s topic, I agree with the statement that “Canada is known for being a world leader when it comes to equality and human rights.” At here, I want to share a significant case which named Canada (AG) v. Mossop to explain the reason. This case “was the first decision of the Supreme Court of Canada to consider equality rights for gays” (Canada (AG) v Mossop, 2015).
Brian Mossop was the main character in the case. He wanted to leave from his employer to attend a funeral for his same-sex partner’s father; however, his employer rejected his requirement because Mossop was not the immediate family (Canada (AG) v Mossop, 2015). Since at that time “sexual orientation was not a prohibited ground of discrimination,” Mossop argued that “he had

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario, Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple, Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married, Spyer died, and left all of her estate to her wife, Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, she was denied because of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which excluded same-sex partners in definition of marriage and spouse. Windsor went on with the issue, paid estate taxes over $300,000, but Window was denied the refund. She then challenged DOMA saying Section 3 was unconstitutional. After a few years with the case working its way through the courts, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent Andrews, a British subject permanently resident in Canada. Andrews met all the requirements for the admission to the British Columbia Bar except for Canadian Citizenship, section 42(a) of Barrister and Solicitors Act. He commenced legal action for a declaration that the requirement violated section 15(1) Of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms; this was dismissed at the trial but allowed on the appeal. The appellants, the Law society of British Columbia and Attorney General of British Columbia, appealed against this declaration that the requirement for Canadian Citizenship infringes the section 15(1) of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cases in Canadian Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant, a citizen of Iran, arrived in Canada on May 13, 1989, and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line, he was referred to a secondary examination, which involved a long wait, and, as he did not speak English, an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview, the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis, as he claims, first of all, that he was detained in a manner that violated s. 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms during the secondary examination at the airport and, also, that this examination violated his right to counsel. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower court and dismissed the appeal. This decision substantiated the right of the state to have an interest in controlling entry into the country and that it is a valid procedure for individuals to undergo questioning when crossing international borders. After the secondary examination, the appellant was advised of his right to counsel to aid him in pursing his claim and he was subsequently represented by counsel in federal court. While having counsel is a crucial right, this case substantiates that it is not appropriate to all circumstances. Counsel is not provided for routine traffic stops. Likewise, the Court is justified in ruling that it is not required for routine immigration questioning.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emily Murphys Case

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Canadians have come to honour the Persons Case as a symbol of equality and recognize the full personhood…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Baker V. Canada

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Baker v Canada [Minister of Citizenship and Immigration], [1999] explains the importance of “the best interest of child” in Canada Immigration proceedings. Mavis Baker, a Jamaican woman entered Canada as a visitor in August of 1981, after the expiration of her visitor’s visa, Ms. Baker lived illegally in Canada as a live-in-worker to support herself and children for 11years. Though, Ms. Baker had four children in Jamaica before visiting Canada, she however gave birth to four other children in Canada namely, Paul Brown, 1985, twins Patricia and Peter Robinson, 1989 and Desmond Robinson, 1992. Following the birth of her last child, Ms. Baker was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia after suffering an attack of post-partum psychosis. Her illness…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Pierre Elliott Trudeau .” The Prime Ministers of Canada. 7th Floor Media, n.d. Web. 15 Dec. 2010.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prostution in Canada

    • 1075 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bedford case goes hand-in-hand with many other security of the persons interest cases under section 7 of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms. Section 7 of the Charter states that “everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”[12] The Court stated that the purpose of section 7 is to ensure that laws that impact the rights to life, liberty and security of the person do not conflict with our basic values. The 'principles of fundamental justice’s are in place in order to understand these basic values about justice.The Court said that one of these principles is a principle against “arbitrariness, over-breadth and gross disproportionality”. A law is “arbitrary” when there is no real connection between the effect of the law and its goal. A law is “over-broad" when the effect of the law goes too far and interferes with activities that are not part of its goal. A law is “grossly disproportionate” when the effect of the law is much harsher than the benefits of achieving its goal. These are all points which relate back to the famous Bedford V. Canada case. In the Bedford case, the governments and the laws they put in place threaten health and bodily integrity of sex workers across the country. In the Bedford case, it was a unanimous decision on behalf of the court, they agreed with the applicants that the criminal prohibitions on bawdy-houses, living on the avails of prostitution, and communicating for the purposes of prostitution “do not merely impose conditions on how prostitutes operate”. They go on to further explain their point by shining light on the dangerous and hidden conditions of prostitution; it stops workers who are apart of dangerous — but legal — work from being able to protect themselves from risks. The Supreme Court found that these provisions, concerned with…

    • 1075 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Windsor: “Because of today’s supreme court ruling, the federal government can no longer against the marriages of gay and lesbian Americans. Children born today will grow up in a world without DOMA, and those same children who happen to be gay will be free to love and get married as Thea and I did but with the same federal benefits, protections, and dignities as everyone…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homosexuality In Canada

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page

    Since the beginning of time, issues regarding homosexuality have proven to be very controversial grounds in society. However, there is no doubt that Canada has challenged these issues and reformed the face of its society by standing as one of the most accepting nations in the world in respect to LGBT equality. A timeline so rich in historical value since 1965 to the present day recounts Canada’s journey in addressing the needs and concerns of this topic. Undoubtedly, while many people still have polar views on this topic, it is something that is fortunately starting to be addressed and accepted more as time progresses. Many factors such as court cases, changes in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the current LGBT movement,…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi 103 Final Gay Marriage

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    THE WORLD; Canada Proposes Legalizing Gay Marriage Across Nation; The government acted to prevent discrimination, the prime minister says. The clergy wouldn 't be compelled to preside over such unions.: [HOME EDITION]…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial activism believes that judges assume a role as independent policy makers on behalf of society that goes beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the Constitution and laws. Prior to the enactment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, the duty of Supreme Court justices was to interpret law, not took it upon themselves to make law. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court justices play a more predominant role in shaping government policy and legislation today than they did prior to 1982. Judicial activism in Canada has produced results that have been perceived as problematic by legislatures. The potential for the Supreme Court justices to interfere with the making of government’s judicial-policy has led to differing opinions…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Delwin Vriend filed a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission because he believes that he was discriminated against by his employer after being fired when his employer became aware that Mr. Vriend was a homosexual.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Gay Rights Movement

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Bibliography: "About LGBT Human Rights." Amnesty International USA - Protect Human Rights. 27 Apr. 2009 .…

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays