Preview

Cancer in Rats Gm Food Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cancer in Rats Gm Food Debate
Cancer in rats reignites GM food debate

A new study has reignited the debate over the long-term health effects of eating genetically modified food.

Published in the journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology, results of the study show that rats fed a GM diet over their lifespan suffered mammary tumours and severe liver and kidney damage.
Advocates of the study say Australia's regulatory bodies should act on the findings, but some scientists have criticised the study, saying it is seriously flawed.
The French government has ordered its health regulator to conduct an urgent review of its findings as anti-GM campaigners worldwide leap on the results.
They say it is the first time a trial has studied the lifetime effects of exposure to GM corn, in this case corn which was tolerant to the weedkiller Roundup.
The director of Australia's Safe Food Foundation, Scott Kinnear, has urged the Federal Government to follow France's lead in approving an urgent review.
"I would even call for them to put a halt on any further regulation and an urgent review of all of the existing products that have been allowed for use in Australia, certainly genetically modified crops and an urgent review of Roundup's regulation in Australia," he said.
"Certainly there is a need for urgent follow-up studies with larger groups of rats involved because that will give greater statistical treatment to the study, but there is enough there now for people to be very concerned."
'Alarmist'
But Professor Mark Tester, director of the Australian Plant Phenomics Facility, says the study is alarmist.
He says it also contradicts more than 100 other scientific studies over the past 20 years, which he says have found no difference in the health or mortality of a variety of mammals exposed to GM foods.
"And they're dealing with geriatric rats. That's why the absence of controls in the study is an absolutely terrible omission," he said.
"What they are doing is presenting deaths of rats after two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, the study lacks validity because real life is not as controlled as in the lab. This is due to the prior warning, video clips and lack of normal distractions. This is bad…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 8881 Words
    • 29 Pages

    The study was based on the analysis of over 1000 human samples from four independent studies. PLOS is an open access, well respected peer reviewed scientific journal that covers primary research from disciplines within science and medicine. It’s great to see this study published in it, confirming what many have been suspecting for years. When it comes to genetically modified crops and foods, we really have no idea of what the long term effects will be on the public. The very first commercial sale of genetically modified foods was only twenty years ago in the year 1994.…

    • 8881 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A weakness of the study is that as it is a lab study it has low ecological validity so its not true to life as the participants will know that they are in a different setting to normal life.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of GM foods believe that researchers promise too much and question if testing has been sufficient enough to see how these GM crops will effect the environment. They believe that these studies are often too limited in both time and space to reach a conclusion. Proponents say that their opposition exaggerate the environmental hazards and are reacting out of fear. They also claim that examinations form government agencies are so intense that many standard foods wouldn’t pass.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They state that either the herbicides sprayed on GMO’s are more dangerous or that the insecticides produced by the plants are dangerous. Neither of these statements hold up upon examination.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say Ch5, 1

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By focusing on how beneficial animal testing is, Gershoff overlooks the deeper problem of animal cruelty due to testing.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And not only has the research on GE foods failed to show they’re safe it as actually confirmed that they should be off the market. Which is better explained in chapter 10 of this novel, For example, the first commercially grown genetically engineered food to be granted a license to get onto the American market was the Flavr Savr tomato which was developed by Calgene in 1992 which aimed to keep the tomato after it was picked to stay firm throughout the shipping process. And at that time, the FDA thought it would help the image of GE foods if they did a few tests to check their safety. However, on two of the three major tests done on rats with the Flavr Savr tomato turned out to be bad news for the company as close to 20% of the rats developed gross lesions in their stomachs. But in the third test some rats which were not fed the Flavr Savr also developed lesions which Calgene thought was encouraging enough to were the FDA would agree the tomato was safe. Which was not the case as many scientists were not won over. However, just like the FDA did in 1992 to issue a statement that clashed with its experts to declare that GE foods can be presumed safe it twisted the information again but in this case it declared that the first bioengineering whole food had actually been proven safe. Not only was it clear that many experts did not agree with the tomato being regarded as safe, and therefore it could not be Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) the tomato was associated with outcomes more severe that lesions as 7 out of 20 rats that ate the GE tomato died within 2 weeks. The FDA ended up announcing the fraudulent claim that Flavr Savr…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are numerous benefits to genetic cultivation as well as many farmers who agree with and practice this way of life. Biotechnology food produces its own insecticide, and its final product is better looking than that of organically grown food. Due to genetically modified food’s unique and unknown nature, however, there is potential for adverse health side effects. On page 467, Pollan writes:…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Anti-GMO Movement

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The American Academy of Environmental Medicine cites animal studies that “show organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders, accelerated aging, and infertility, as well as human studies that show how genetically modified food can leave material behind inside us, possibly causing long-term problems,” (Smith). For example, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine found that “genes inserted into genetically modified soy can transfer into the DNA of bacteria living inside us, and that the toxic insecticide produced by genetically modified corn was found in the blood of pregnant women and their unborn fetuses,”…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gmos Research Paper

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When one tries to prove that GMOs are safe, the other does the same to prove the contrary. However, there is one point that both side agree on and that is that GMOs are already on the American market. Starting from that point we can make our own observations. For instance, if it is true that we have been eating GMOs for the past years then surely we will have been affected by its health risks if there are such risks. The problem is that there has been no symptoms of any sort for the last few years neither for me or anyone in my environment just like was observed by the scientists of the National Academies of Sciences, Mechanics and Medicine (“The Verdict on GMO…” 71). Now I do not claim that GMOs can save us from world hunger, but one thing is sure, they are not dangerous for our health. I do not agree with everything said by the GMOs activists, but I tend to believe them more because the basis of the argument, the safety of GMOs, is most likely to be true. I also tend to believe them more after Lynas’ interview for he witnessed the views of both sides making him, more or less an objective source, and sided with the GMOs activists (“GMOS: A Solution or…” 131-132). Thus, I find myself adopting, the pro-GMOs position for I cannot see any dangers in…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gmos

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Helke, Ferrie. "Evidence Grows of Harmful Effects of GMOs on Human Health." Academic Search Complete. EBSCO, Oct. 2011. Web.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    She tells consumers to be wary about consuming GMO’s, since they have not been proven safe for consumption yet. She also says a healthy alternative to GMO’s would be the production and consumption of more fruits and vegetables. However, she is a Nutritionist who writes for Livescience. Nutritionist encourages people to eat more organic food such as fruits and vegetables. So, since she stands for more organic foods, it only makes sense that she would be opposed to modified foods. Her article that was published in 2013 is outdated to the newest research that has been conducted by scientist as recent as 2016. Her article tells people to stay away from GMO’s because they are not healthy and are bad for our environment which she has not proven in her article, because she never used facts to show how these GMO’s are both bad for humans and the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Effects of Gmos

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two articles I have chosen are both peer-reviewed and have two different opinions about GMO’s. The first article, titled “GMO’s and Global Justice” by Kristian Toft, is against the use of GMO’s, explaining how they are bad for us as human beings and for our environment. Her biggest concern is that we do not know the extent of what these genetically modified foods are doing to our bodies because of the lack of long-term affect testing. When trans-fats were first introduced, corporations battled to get them onto our grocery shelves. It is only decades later that this once novel food has been proven to be extremely unhealthful. This could be a glance into the future of GMO’s. It is similarly a concern that GMO’s in food are causing an increase in allergic reactions. The process of genetically modifying a plant or animal adds new proteins that weren’t indigenous to the original plant or animal, causing an allergic reaction increase when ingested in the human body. Also, some GMO foods have had antibiotic features added to them so they are resistant to certain diseases and viruses. When humans eat them, these antibiotics features persist in our bodies and make actual antibiotic medications less effective. Toft goes on to say that GMO’s are banned in more than 60 countries around the world including, the European Union,…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A number scientists specializing in the field of genetics argue that consumption of genetically modified foods could lead to serious health risks. They agree that although there is not enough evidence to completely support their claim, there are instances of deterioration of health following the…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Dr. Mark Feinberg said “that since humans behave totally different from monkeys, testing a vaccine in a monkey is a waste of time.” Dr. Michael Klaper said that he cannot remember a single instance where his medical judgment was even remotely influenced by tests using animals as subjects. Dr. Neil Barnard said “not only are these studies lacking validity but they also use money that should be used for patient care needs.” Dr. Robert Mendelsohn said, “The reason why I am against animal research is because it doesn’t work, it has no scientific value and every good scientist knows that”…

    • 2460 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays