Capital punishment should be banned under international low. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Capital punishment should be banned under international low. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
The question about prohibition of death penalty has been debated for centuries. One view is that capital punishment is amoral action and not help to prevent crime. On the other hand, those who oppose that deterrent effect of the death penalty is extremely high and it is fair retribution for murder. This essay will explore this arguments and argue that capital punishment could be efficient tool for maintenance of state order.
There are a number of assertions made against of the death penalty. Firstly, it is contrary to the moral principles to perform execution even if it follows the low. Furthermore, lethal injection, which is one of the method using for capital punishment, involves medical personnel in killing and puts them on one level with murders. Secondly, until now, researches do not found correlation between reduction of the number of crimes and the death penalty.
However, some proponents of capital punishment argue that it has deterrent effect and helps avoid crime in future. Murders will understand that the judgment for crime is inevitable and they will have to pay for it with their lives. Moreover, there are cases when the killers were saving their victims trying to escape the death penalty. Another argument in favor of capital punishment is that guilty people deserve to be punished comparable with the severity of their felony. Consequently, in the case of murders, just retribution is the death penalty.
In conclusion, based on the above arguments, I strongly disagree with the fact that the death penalty should be banned under international law. I believe that modern society still needs the death penalty as preventive means of deterring crime.
The question about prohibition of death penalty has been debated for centuries. One view is that capital punishment is amoral action and not help to prevent crime. On the other hand, those who oppose that deterrent effect of the death penalty is extremely high and it is fair retribution for murder. This essay will explore this arguments and argue that capital punishment could be efficient tool for maintenance of state order.
There are a number of assertions made against of the death penalty. Firstly, it is contrary to the moral principles to perform execution even if it follows the low. Furthermore, lethal injection, which is one of the method using for capital punishment, involves medical personnel in killing and puts them on one level with murders. Secondly, until now, researches do not found correlation between reduction of the number of crimes and the death penalty.
However, some proponents of capital punishment argue that it has deterrent effect and helps avoid crime in future. Murders will understand that the judgment for crime is inevitable and they will have to pay for it with their lives. Moreover, there are cases when the killers were saving their victims trying to escape the death penalty. Another argument in favor of capital punishment is that guilty people deserve to be punished comparable with the severity of their felony. Consequently, in the case of murders, just retribution is the death penalty.
In conclusion, based on the above arguments, I strongly disagree with the fact that the death penalty should be banned under international law. I believe that modern society still needs the death penalty as preventive means of deterring crime.