Preview

Capital Punishment Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Utilitarianism
Capital Punishment is a highly controversial and emotional subject in which most people seem to have strong opinions. The debate is by no means new, however, in my opinion, the death penalty is cruel and inhumane. During biblical time, capital punishment has been an issue.
In writing this paper, I intend to argue the topic from a utliitarian point of view using Rawls Priciple of Justice. Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that theoutcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society.
In the United States, controversy over capital punishment began in colonial
…show more content…
It is the consequentialist theory, where the emphasis is on consequences, not intentions. The classical utilitarianism theoy of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham agreed that actions are judeged by the virtures of their consequences and also added that the pursuit and the production of happiness should be taken into consideration. This theory is summarized in three claims known as the consequentialist claim, the happiness claim and the objectivity claim. Claim one states that the actions are to be judged right or wrong solely by the virtue of their consequences. The second claim of happiness states that the only thing that matters when assessing the consequences of an action is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that is created, everything else being irrelevant. And finally, the third claim of objectivity when measuring the amount of happiness resulted by the consequence of an action, each person’s happiness should be counted as equally important. According to utilitarianism views we are to do whatever will increase the amount of happiness in the …show more content…
Innocent people may be executed just for the sake of promoting general welfare. In addition, the death penalty is irreversible, even if an executed person was proved later to be innocent; he cannot be given another chance under the death penalty. Statistics have shown that in the last 100 years, eight cases where innocent people have actually been executed. That may not seem like a lot, but what is the price for someone’s life? It also goes against the betterment of society because the actually offeneders were no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Night by Elie Wiesel a memoir about his time in the Holocaust concentration camps Elie used animal imagery. Animal imagery is when someone uses animal instincts and behavior to define the characteristics of a human. Using animal imagery, he accomplished multiple things. One of them is showing how the prisoners act and how this experience has changed them and made them animal-like. Most people know how animals act. An by using animal imagery the author gives the reader a greater understanding of the situation. There is evidence backed by many examples in Elie’s writing.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soc120 Week 3

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advocates of the death penalty recognize that no system is perfect and that applying the death penalty runs a small risk of executing someone who is innocent. Is this a price society should be willing to pay?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This theory is a consequentialist based ethical theory which states you must choose the action that increases the total utility. John Stuart Mill was a key proponent of Utilitarianism. Utility is defined as the total happiness or pleasure, minus the total unhappiness or pain involved in the action. Another name for utility is the Greatest Happiness principle. From the definition of utility, pleasure and the absence of pain are the only things desirable as ends in themselves and are the only things that are good.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stated by the NOHS “The field of Human Services is broadly defined, uniquely approaching the objective of meeting human needs through an interdisciplinary knowledge base, fixating on obviation as well as remediation of problems, and maintaining a commitment to ameliorating the overall quality of life of accommodation populations”. (NOHS, 2012)…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the capital punishment also claim that the whole principle of the death penalty is overshadowed by the proven risk of executing innocent people and that the avoidable killing of such people can never be justified. And according to Amnesty International, there were more than 400 known cases of wrongful convictions for capital offenses in the U.S. between 1900 and 1991. These facts will of course make a good standing point for the opponents of the capital punishment but its supporters argue that these problems are caused not by the principle itself but its failed implementation and that the opponents use such cases to cloud the real issue.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every convicted felon waiting on death row costs the American people over nine million dollars yearly to imprison. Such an absurd amount of money should be spent on the rehabilitation of these troubled individuals rather than in prolonging their lives only for their own demise. Before reverting to the early philosophy of Hammurabi “an eye for an eye” America should look to its own foundation, the constitution, as well as compare the costs and benefits of such a policy being legal. Despite enormous protections offered by the federal and states constitutions throughout the United States, many people have been executed in spite of evidence of their innocence. When capital punishment is concerned, most Americans believe our criminal system is close to infallible. Many assume that if factual errors do occur at trial, they will be discovered and corrected by higher courts. People believe that the innocent are rarely wrongly convicted and they are certainly not executed. Unfortunately, there is a large numbers of innocents people who…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major purpose of the death penalty is to punish people for their horrible crimes. However, the death penalty has put many innocent people on death row. Since 1973, 156 people have been exonerated (released from death row/evidence shows they aren’t guilty). The average time between getting the death sentence and exoneration is about 11 years. This is already terrible, forcing innocent people to believe that their life is nearly over, because of a crime that they didn’t commit, but it gets worse. It is very likely that people living in the United States have been wrongly executed. Multiple cases have evidence that proves that the “criminal” is actually innocent. In 1991, the house of Cameron Todd Willingham was destroyed by a fire, killing the three children who were sleeping inside. Willingham escaped and his wife was shopping at the time. Prosecutors stated that Willingham had purposefully set the house on fire to cover up the abuse of his children. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004. However, there is a proof that shows that the fire was not caused by Willingham. Unfortunately, nothing can be done now because these people have already been executed, but it does teach us one thing: If the death penalty cannot be used to punish the real offender and risks the lives of innocent people in the process, it can’t be used by our…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Shea (17) the utilitarian model of decision making process is similar to the concept of majority rule whereby each group members has the right to vote. This idea can be an indication that the majority of people can decide to vote against what is ‘deserved’ provided that their decision maximizes happiness and minimizes suffering. As such, when the preferences of a moral system chooses utilitarianism that endeavors to maximize utility usually less suffering and more happiness, could cause the unjust treatment of weak and voiceless people in the society for the sake of general happiness as a result of majority rule that ignores the minority. Therefore, the concepts of utilitarianism and justice are countercurrent to each other and utilitarianism cannot accommodate the concept of justice…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are few policies that produce as much debate, controversy and emotion in this country as the death penalty. Capital punishment has been around in this country since colonial times when people were killed for practicing witchcraft and today the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Since 1976, 1414 people have been executed in the U.S. (deathpenaltyinfo.org). People who favor capital punishment believe that if someone brutally take's another person's life then they should lose their own right to life. However, in taking a closer look at the death penalty, there are many problems associated with it such as that is is morally wrong, the botching of executions, the execution of innocent people, and the fact that it is a flawed system…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism derives itself from a combination of hedonism and consequentialism. Hedonism suggests that consequences are good as long as they lead to pleasure, which is the ultimate good in the case of utilitarianism. On the other hand, consequentialism argues that the right action is the one that produces the best consequences, and maximizes utility. Mill argues that the only factor relevant to actions is the amount of pleasure or pain produced, not the motives that propel action. Utilitarianism seems to be based off of a calculation aiming to minimize pain and maximize pleasure. While justice can initially be seen as an objection to this school of ethics, it can be argued that justice complements, and does not challenge the principles…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, there is the issue of the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty. There have been countless cases to come before the courts, alleging that there are innocent individuals on death row and that this is an act that cannot be reversed if the criminal allegations prove to be untrue. Adding to the issue is that the death penalty costs the state and ultimately society, millions of dollars to process a capital punishment. Most of the offenders on death row, challenge the process at every step of the judicial process and in doing so likely waste considerable resources as often the end result remains the same, barring new evidence.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty in American society using the teleological argument is that Utilitarianism is a part of the teleological ethical system. Utilitarianism is the ethical system that claims that the greatest good is that which results in the greatest happinesss for the greatest number. In a teleological viewpoint or argument, they focus more so on the consequences rather than the action being made. Utilitarianism theory would view the death penalty or capital punishment as being good or being moral. I think utilitarianism looks at the death penalty as moral because the main focus in utilitarianism is looking at the greatest happiness of the person. When you think of the teleological viewpoint it is also known as the ends justify the means.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assiginment 1 Ethical

    • 1728 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory; by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill who were the first to develop this theory in detail. It is a consequentialist theory because ethical decisions should be made on the expected consequences of the action weather its right or wrong. The good: things that are worth pursuing and promoting, eg goals. The right: morals of actions and duties. The main principle for utilitarianism is the actions of happiness, which equals to ‘ pleasure and the absence of pain’ (Stuart, 2009). The actions of unhappiness: equals to the ‘pain, and the absence of…

    • 1728 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays